Ji-won Shin, Sung-Won Jin, Se-Hoon Kim, J. Choi, Bum-Joon Kim, Sang-Dae Kim, D. Lim
{"title":"Predictors of Outcome in Patients with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Undergoing Unilateral Open-Door Laminoplasty","authors":"Ji-won Shin, Sung-Won Jin, Se-Hoon Kim, J. Choi, Bum-Joon Kim, Sang-Dae Kim, D. Lim","doi":"10.14245/kjs.2015.12.4.261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective This study aimed to analyze prognostic factors affecting surgical outcomes of expansive laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Methods Using the Frankel scale and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scale, we retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 45 consecutive patients who underwent modified unilateral open-door laminoplasty using hydroxyapatite spacers and malleable titanium miniplates between June 2008 and May 2014. The patients were assigned to the good and poor clinical outcome groups, with good outcome defined as a JOA recovery rate >75%. Results The mean preoperative JOA scale was significantly higher in the good outcome group (14.95±3.21 vs. 10.78±6.07, p<0.001), whereas the preoperative cervical range of motion (ROM) in this group was significantly lower (29.89°±10.11 vs. 44.35°± 8.88, p<0.001). In univariate analysis, a high preoperative JOA scale (odds ratio (OR) 1.271, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.005-1.607) and low preoperative cervical ROM(OR 0.858, 95% CI 0.786-0.936) were statistically correlated with good outcomes. Furthermore, these factors demonstrated an independent association with clinical outcomes (preoperative JOA scale: OR 1.344, 95% CI 1.019-1.774, p=0.036; preoperative cervical ROM: OR 0.860, 95% CI 0.788-0.940, p=0.001). Conclusion In this study, a high preoperative JOA scale was associated with good clinical outcome after laminoplasty, whereas a higher preoperative cervical spine ROM was associated with poor clinical outcome. This may suggests that cervical mobility and preoperative neurological status affect clinical outcomes of laminoplasty.","PeriodicalId":17867,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Spine","volume":"34 1","pages":"261 - 266"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14245/kjs.2015.12.4.261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to analyze prognostic factors affecting surgical outcomes of expansive laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Methods Using the Frankel scale and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scale, we retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 45 consecutive patients who underwent modified unilateral open-door laminoplasty using hydroxyapatite spacers and malleable titanium miniplates between June 2008 and May 2014. The patients were assigned to the good and poor clinical outcome groups, with good outcome defined as a JOA recovery rate >75%. Results The mean preoperative JOA scale was significantly higher in the good outcome group (14.95±3.21 vs. 10.78±6.07, p<0.001), whereas the preoperative cervical range of motion (ROM) in this group was significantly lower (29.89°±10.11 vs. 44.35°± 8.88, p<0.001). In univariate analysis, a high preoperative JOA scale (odds ratio (OR) 1.271, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.005-1.607) and low preoperative cervical ROM(OR 0.858, 95% CI 0.786-0.936) were statistically correlated with good outcomes. Furthermore, these factors demonstrated an independent association with clinical outcomes (preoperative JOA scale: OR 1.344, 95% CI 1.019-1.774, p=0.036; preoperative cervical ROM: OR 0.860, 95% CI 0.788-0.940, p=0.001). Conclusion In this study, a high preoperative JOA scale was associated with good clinical outcome after laminoplasty, whereas a higher preoperative cervical spine ROM was associated with poor clinical outcome. This may suggests that cervical mobility and preoperative neurological status affect clinical outcomes of laminoplasty.
目的分析影响脊髓型颈椎病扩大椎板成形术预后的因素。方法采用Frankel评分和日本骨科协会(JOA)评分,回顾性分析2008年6月至2014年5月间45例连续接受羟基磷灰石间隔片和可塑钛微型板改良单侧开门椎板成形术的患者的结果。将患者分为临床结果良好组和临床结果较差组,良好结果定义为JOA恢复率>75%。结果预后良好组术前JOA评分平均值明显高于对照组(14.95±3.21比10.78±6.07,p<0.001),而预后良好组术前颈椎活动度(ROM)明显低于对照组(29.89°±10.11比44.35°±8.88,p<0.001)。在单因素分析中,高术前JOA量表(比值比(OR) 1.271, 95%可信区间(CI) 1.005-1.607)和低术前颈椎ROM量表(OR 0.858, 95% CI 0.786-0.936)与预后良好具有统计学相关性。此外,这些因素显示与临床结果独立相关(术前JOA量表:OR 1.344, 95% CI 1.019-1.774, p=0.036;术前颈椎ROM: OR 0.860, 95% CI 0.788-0.940, p=0.001)。结论:在本研究中,较高的术前JOA评分与椎板成形术后良好的临床结果相关,而较高的术前颈椎ROM与较差的临床结果相关。这可能表明颈椎活动度和术前神经状态影响椎板成形术的临床结果。