The concept of grave torment: A comparison of the thoughts of Ibn Qayyim Al-Jauziyah and Albert Bandura

Nada Shobah, Achmad Khudori Sholeh
{"title":"The concept of grave torment: A comparison of the thoughts of Ibn Qayyim Al-Jauziyah and Albert Bandura","authors":"Nada Shobah, Achmad Khudori Sholeh","doi":"10.18860/psikoislamika.v19i2.17187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The torment of the grave is the consequence and punishment for servants of every deed done in the world. The similarity of context related to grave torments between Ibn Qayyim al-Jauziyah's perspective and Albert Bandura's social theory of learning has gaps of difference that form the basis of this research, so the author conducts a comparative analysis from the point of view of the two characters. This article aims to find differences and similarities in the concept of strengthening from the comparative analysis of Ibn Qayyim al-Jauziyah's thoughts on the torment of the grave with Albert Bandura's thoughts. This study uses qualitative research methods with comparative analysis techniques. The results show that Ibn Qayyim al-Jauziyah's thoughts on grave punishment have the same concept as Albert Bandura's social learning theory, namely grave punishment as a form of reinforcement so that individuals do not repeat bad behavior. The difference lies in the form of reinforcement , the form of change, the timing of administration, behavioral patterns, the function of observation in modeling, model classification, and reinforcement success.","PeriodicalId":34883,"journal":{"name":"Psikoislamika","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psikoislamika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18860/psikoislamika.v19i2.17187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: The torment of the grave is the consequence and punishment for servants of every deed done in the world. The similarity of context related to grave torments between Ibn Qayyim al-Jauziyah's perspective and Albert Bandura's social theory of learning has gaps of difference that form the basis of this research, so the author conducts a comparative analysis from the point of view of the two characters. This article aims to find differences and similarities in the concept of strengthening from the comparative analysis of Ibn Qayyim al-Jauziyah's thoughts on the torment of the grave with Albert Bandura's thoughts. This study uses qualitative research methods with comparative analysis techniques. The results show that Ibn Qayyim al-Jauziyah's thoughts on grave punishment have the same concept as Albert Bandura's social learning theory, namely grave punishment as a form of reinforcement so that individuals do not repeat bad behavior. The difference lies in the form of reinforcement , the form of change, the timing of administration, behavioral patterns, the function of observation in modeling, model classification, and reinforcement success.
严重折磨的概念:伊本·加伊姆·乔齐亚和阿尔伯特·班杜拉思想的比较
当前位置坟墓的折磨是对人世间一切行为的仆人的后果和惩罚。Ibn Qayyim al-Jauziyah的视角与Albert Bandura的社会学习理论之间关于严重折磨的语境的相似性存在差异,这也是本研究的基础,因此笔者从这两个人物的角度进行比较分析。本文旨在通过对伊本·加伊姆·乔齐亚关于坟墓折磨的思想与班杜拉思想的比较分析,找出强化概念的异同。本研究采用定性研究与比较分析相结合的方法。结果表明,Ibn Qayyim al-Jauziyah的重刑思想与Albert Bandura的社会学习理论具有相同的概念,即重刑是一种强化形式,使个体不再重复不良行为。区别在于强化的形式、改变的形式、管理的时机、行为模式、观察在建模中的作用、模型分类和强化成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信