{"title":"The Wartime Battlefield of Sex","authors":"Ruth Lawlor","doi":"10.1017/MAH.2021.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When American forces broke through German resistance in the spring of 1945, U.S. Army commanders began to worry about rising reports of sexual violence. “Since the entry into Germany by the Seventh Army the number of cases of rape have increased greatly,” General Alexander Patch reported. “The situation is one in which it is believed emergency action is required.” Omar Bradley, commander of the largest group of armies on the continent, warned General Dwight D. Eisenhower that “certain conditions of looting, pillaging, wanton destruction, rape and other crimes” were widespread. By the time of his writing, in April 1945, some 500 reports of rape per week were flooding into the Judge Advocate General’s office. An after-action report would later confirm these concerns: “We were members of a conquering army and we came as conquerors. The rates of reported rapes sprang skyward.” This report acknowledged that many more rapes occurred than were reflected in general court-martial records, which listed 552 trials for Germany as a whole until the end of the war. The Judge Advocate said that not more than 25 percent of reported cases ever made it to trial. The situation was “ripe for violent sex crimes,” the report concluded, and “the avalanche came.” The history of Allied sexual violence in Nazi Germany is a troubled one. Numerous historians have documented the extensive sexual assaults that German women suffered at war’s end; in popular memory, this history is associated above all with the Soviet “Rape of Berlin,” though French and American troops were also regularly accused of gendered violence. After Germany’s defeat in 1945, such stories of sexual violation would be transformed into a mythology of national violation that was effectively racialized and put toward neo-fascist ends. This prospect was immediately discernible to black soldiers and journalists on the ground in Germany in the spring of 1945, who saw how the U.S. Army’s commitment to Jim Crow segregation—including prohibitions on sex and fraternization across the color line—aligned with","PeriodicalId":36673,"journal":{"name":"Modern American History","volume":"62 1","pages":"209 - 212"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern American History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/MAH.2021.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
When American forces broke through German resistance in the spring of 1945, U.S. Army commanders began to worry about rising reports of sexual violence. “Since the entry into Germany by the Seventh Army the number of cases of rape have increased greatly,” General Alexander Patch reported. “The situation is one in which it is believed emergency action is required.” Omar Bradley, commander of the largest group of armies on the continent, warned General Dwight D. Eisenhower that “certain conditions of looting, pillaging, wanton destruction, rape and other crimes” were widespread. By the time of his writing, in April 1945, some 500 reports of rape per week were flooding into the Judge Advocate General’s office. An after-action report would later confirm these concerns: “We were members of a conquering army and we came as conquerors. The rates of reported rapes sprang skyward.” This report acknowledged that many more rapes occurred than were reflected in general court-martial records, which listed 552 trials for Germany as a whole until the end of the war. The Judge Advocate said that not more than 25 percent of reported cases ever made it to trial. The situation was “ripe for violent sex crimes,” the report concluded, and “the avalanche came.” The history of Allied sexual violence in Nazi Germany is a troubled one. Numerous historians have documented the extensive sexual assaults that German women suffered at war’s end; in popular memory, this history is associated above all with the Soviet “Rape of Berlin,” though French and American troops were also regularly accused of gendered violence. After Germany’s defeat in 1945, such stories of sexual violation would be transformed into a mythology of national violation that was effectively racialized and put toward neo-fascist ends. This prospect was immediately discernible to black soldiers and journalists on the ground in Germany in the spring of 1945, who saw how the U.S. Army’s commitment to Jim Crow segregation—including prohibitions on sex and fraternization across the color line—aligned with
1945年春天,当美军突破德军的抵抗时,美国陆军指挥官开始担心不断上升的性暴力报告。“自从第七集团军进入德国以来,强奸案件的数量大大增加,”亚历山大·帕奇将军报告说。“在这种情况下,我们认为需要采取紧急行动。”奥马尔·布拉德利(Omar Bradley)是非洲大陆最大军队群的指挥官,他警告德怀特·d·艾森豪威尔将军(Dwight D. Eisenhower),“某些抢劫、掠夺、肆意破坏、强奸和其他罪行的情况”很普遍。到他于1945年4月写作时,每周大约有500起强奸案的报告涌进总检察官办公室。一份事后报告证实了这些担忧:“我们是一支征服大军的成员,我们是作为征服者而来的。报告的强奸率直线上升。”这份报告承认,发生的强奸案比一般军事法庭记录所反映的要多得多。一般军事法庭记录列出了战争结束前整个德国的552起审判。法官辩护律师表示,只有不到25%的报告案件最终进入了审判。报告总结道,“暴力性犯罪的时机已经成熟”,“雪崩来了”。纳粹德国盟军的性暴力史是一段令人不安的历史。许多历史学家记录了德国妇女在战争结束时遭受的广泛性侵犯;在大众的记忆中,这段历史首先与苏联的“柏林大屠杀”(Rape of Berlin)联系在一起,尽管法国和美国军队也经常被指控实施性别暴力。1945年德国战败后,这种性侵犯的故事被转化为民族侵犯的神话,实际上被种族化,并被推向新法西斯主义的目的。1945年春天,在德国战场上的黑人士兵和记者们立即察觉到了这一前景,他们看到了美国军队对吉姆·克劳种族隔离的承诺——包括禁止跨肤色的性行为和兄弟会——是如何与之一致的