ROLE OF CO2 GAS EMISSION TAX ON FOSSIL FUEL IN REDUCING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT “A PERSPECTIVE FOR INDONESIA”

Kemas Fachruddin, A. Fauzi, Ahmad Bey, Surjono H Surtjahjo
{"title":"ROLE OF CO2 GAS EMISSION TAX ON FOSSIL FUEL IN REDUCING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT “A PERSPECTIVE FOR INDONESIA”","authors":"Kemas Fachruddin, A. Fauzi, Ahmad Bey, Surjono H Surtjahjo","doi":"10.29017/scog.30.2.982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the year 2001, Indonesia was ranked 21st in producing CO2 emissions. In 1990 thetotal emission of CO2 from the burning of fossil fuel was estimated at 83.8 million tonnesand by the end of the year 2020 the total emissions are estimated to be 368.3 milliontonnes. Currently, Indonesia has no specific regulation in place for controlling CO2 emissionseither in the form of an act or government regulation.Some approaches in controlling such emissions are through “common and control”and or “market based instrument” (sometimes this term is called “economic instrument”).Based on experience from developed countries, economic instrument in the form of carbontax or emission tax is preferred due to it’s effectiveness compared with the commonand control instrument.This empirical study is intended to analyze the role of economic instrument in the formof a carbon or emission tax on the energy of fossil fuel through a modified DICE (DynamicIntegrated Model of Climate Change and the Economy). The DICE model is alsocalled a “Three –Box Model” or “Two Folded Model”By using some rate of social preference (R), the model outcome suggests that appropriateoptimal taxes for petrol and coal are if model using R value of 5%. Value of carbon taxper ton in optimal condition for period of 1990-2019 is within the range $US3.90 – 40.35or $US1.06 -11.00 USD CO2 per ton. The price is equivalent to $US 0.002 – 0.024 perliter petrol and $US 1.95 -20.25 per ton coal.Based on the model output it is indicated that carbon or emission tax with optimalscenario has no significant impact on income per capita relative to “Base Case”. Shouldthe government apply tax instruments with optimal scenario, revenue of emission taxes willfall between $US 457.6 – 2,362.8 million for period 1990-2019. The revenue consists of$US 376.1 – 1,585.6 million generated from petrol and $US 81.4 – 777.2 million fromcoal.","PeriodicalId":21649,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Contributions Oil and Gas","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Contributions Oil and Gas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29017/scog.30.2.982","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the year 2001, Indonesia was ranked 21st in producing CO2 emissions. In 1990 thetotal emission of CO2 from the burning of fossil fuel was estimated at 83.8 million tonnesand by the end of the year 2020 the total emissions are estimated to be 368.3 milliontonnes. Currently, Indonesia has no specific regulation in place for controlling CO2 emissionseither in the form of an act or government regulation.Some approaches in controlling such emissions are through “common and control”and or “market based instrument” (sometimes this term is called “economic instrument”).Based on experience from developed countries, economic instrument in the form of carbontax or emission tax is preferred due to it’s effectiveness compared with the commonand control instrument.This empirical study is intended to analyze the role of economic instrument in the formof a carbon or emission tax on the energy of fossil fuel through a modified DICE (DynamicIntegrated Model of Climate Change and the Economy). The DICE model is alsocalled a “Three –Box Model” or “Two Folded Model”By using some rate of social preference (R), the model outcome suggests that appropriateoptimal taxes for petrol and coal are if model using R value of 5%. Value of carbon taxper ton in optimal condition for period of 1990-2019 is within the range $US3.90 – 40.35or $US1.06 -11.00 USD CO2 per ton. The price is equivalent to $US 0.002 – 0.024 perliter petrol and $US 1.95 -20.25 per ton coal.Based on the model output it is indicated that carbon or emission tax with optimalscenario has no significant impact on income per capita relative to “Base Case”. Shouldthe government apply tax instruments with optimal scenario, revenue of emission taxes willfall between $US 457.6 – 2,362.8 million for period 1990-2019. The revenue consists of$US 376.1 – 1,585.6 million generated from petrol and $US 81.4 – 777.2 million fromcoal.
化石燃料二氧化碳排放税在减少环境影响方面的作用“印尼视角”
2001年,印尼的二氧化碳排放量排在第21位。1990年,化石燃料燃烧产生的二氧化碳排放总量估计为8380万吨,到2020年底,排放总量估计为3.683亿吨。目前,印尼没有以法案或政府法规的形式来控制二氧化碳排放的具体法规。控制这类排放的一些办法是通过“共同和控制”和或“基于市场的工具”(有时这一术语被称为“经济工具”)。从发达国家的经验来看,碳税或排放税等经济手段相对于一般的控制手段而言更有效,因此更受青睐。本实证研究旨在通过改进的DICE(气候变化与经济的动态综合模型)分析以碳或排放税形式对化石燃料能源的经济工具的作用。DICE模型也被称为“三盒模型”或“两折模型”通过使用一定的社会偏好率(R),模型结果表明,如果使用R值为5%的模型,汽油和煤炭的适当最佳税收。1990-2019年期间,最佳条件下每吨碳税的价值在每吨二氧化碳3.90 - 40.35美元或1.06 -11.00美元之间。价格相当于每升汽油0.002至0.024美元,每吨煤1.95至20.25美元。结果表明,与“基本情景”相比,最优情景下碳税或排放税对人均收入的影响不显著。如果政府采用最优方案的税收工具,1990年至2019年期间的排放税收入将在45760万美元至23.628亿美元之间。其中,石油收入为3.761亿至15.856亿美元,煤炭收入为8140亿至7.772亿美元。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书