Ultrasonography Assessment of Repaired Median Nerve

IF 0.2 Q4 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
M. Yavari, Soraya Shahrokh Shahraki, A. Tabrizi, A. Mohammadi
{"title":"Ultrasonography Assessment of Repaired Median Nerve","authors":"M. Yavari, Soraya Shahrokh Shahraki, A. Tabrizi, A. Mohammadi","doi":"10.30491/TM.2021.258227.1201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Traumatic peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs) caused by penetrating and lacerated trauma are among the most prevalent microsurgical injuries. Post-treatment follow-up and prognosis of patients undergoing repair are often based on clinical examinations and electrodiagnostic findings. Therefore, a reliable, inexpensive, useful, and rapidly accessible diagnostic method is necessary during the patient's follow-up.Objectives: This study aimed to assess the relationship between ultrasound imaging and treatment outcomes in patients with median peripheral nerve injury.Methods: In this cohort study, 21 eligible patients with symptoms of acute median nerve injury (MNI) caused by penetrating trauma in microsurgery were studied from June 2018 to June 2019. The patients underwent ultrasonography three months after repair and were followed up for at least nine months. The outcomes of the treatment were compared with those obtained six months after ultrasonography.Results: In all studied patients, mean thicknesses of the repaired nerve on the distal and the proximal sides were 2.58±0.51 and 2.51±0.61 mm2, respectively; 12 cases (57.1%) recovered very well nine months after surgery and in nine cases (42.9%) no nerve recovery was observed based on clinical electromyography (EMG) examinations and nerve conduction velocity (NCV). The amount of neuroma formed at the repair site was lower in well-recovered patients (1.5±0.4 mm3) than those with no recovery (4.9±1.5 mm3). No re-rupture was observed at the repair site. Each group underwent two-four repairs of flexor tendons.Conclusion: Ultrasound can be used as an effective and non-invasive method for assessment of PNI and follow-up of reconstructive surgery.","PeriodicalId":23249,"journal":{"name":"Trauma monthly","volume":"110 1","pages":"194-198"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma monthly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30491/TM.2021.258227.1201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Traumatic peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs) caused by penetrating and lacerated trauma are among the most prevalent microsurgical injuries. Post-treatment follow-up and prognosis of patients undergoing repair are often based on clinical examinations and electrodiagnostic findings. Therefore, a reliable, inexpensive, useful, and rapidly accessible diagnostic method is necessary during the patient's follow-up.Objectives: This study aimed to assess the relationship between ultrasound imaging and treatment outcomes in patients with median peripheral nerve injury.Methods: In this cohort study, 21 eligible patients with symptoms of acute median nerve injury (MNI) caused by penetrating trauma in microsurgery were studied from June 2018 to June 2019. The patients underwent ultrasonography three months after repair and were followed up for at least nine months. The outcomes of the treatment were compared with those obtained six months after ultrasonography.Results: In all studied patients, mean thicknesses of the repaired nerve on the distal and the proximal sides were 2.58±0.51 and 2.51±0.61 mm2, respectively; 12 cases (57.1%) recovered very well nine months after surgery and in nine cases (42.9%) no nerve recovery was observed based on clinical electromyography (EMG) examinations and nerve conduction velocity (NCV). The amount of neuroma formed at the repair site was lower in well-recovered patients (1.5±0.4 mm3) than those with no recovery (4.9±1.5 mm3). No re-rupture was observed at the repair site. Each group underwent two-four repairs of flexor tendons.Conclusion: Ultrasound can be used as an effective and non-invasive method for assessment of PNI and follow-up of reconstructive surgery.
正中神经修复的超声评价
背景:外伤性周围神经损伤(PNIs)是最常见的显微外科损伤之一。术后随访和修复患者的预后通常基于临床检查和电诊断结果。因此,在患者随访过程中,需要一种可靠、廉价、实用、快速的诊断方法。目的:本研究旨在探讨超声成像与正中周围神经损伤患者治疗结果的关系。方法:本队列研究选取2018年6月至2019年6月显微外科手术中穿透性创伤致急性正中神经损伤(MNI)患者21例。术后3个月行超声检查,随访至少9个月。将治疗结果与超声检查后6个月的结果进行比较。结果:所有患者的修复神经远端和近端平均厚度分别为2.58±0.51和2.51±0.61 mm2;12例(57.1%)术后9个月恢复良好,9例(42.9%)临床肌电图(EMG)及神经传导速度(NCV)未见神经恢复。修复部位形成的神经瘤数量在恢复良好的患者(1.5±0.4 mm3)低于未恢复的患者(4.9±1.5 mm3)。修复部位未见再破裂。每组进行2 - 4次屈肌腱修复。结论:超声可作为一种有效的、无创的评估PNI及重建手术随访的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trauma monthly
Trauma monthly EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信