Cost-Benefit Analysis of Continuous and Rotational Grazing Systems——A Case Study in Maqu County, China

Sanqiang Du, K. Yasunobu, A. Elias, Yuki Toyama
{"title":"Cost-Benefit Analysis of Continuous and Rotational Grazing Systems——A Case Study in Maqu County, China","authors":"Sanqiang Du, K. Yasunobu, A. Elias, Yuki Toyama","doi":"10.55375/joar.2023.2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rotational grazing systems (RGS) have been advocated as a superior grazing strategy by the Chinese government based on their significant ecological advantage compared to continuous grazing systems (CGS). In practice, however, due to the low-adoption rate of RGS the favorable effect is limited. This study analyzed the total production cost, gross production value, and net margin of CGS and RGS from the perspective of cost benefits. Data were collected from telephone and face-to-face questionnaire survey of 121 randomly sampled households in Maqu County in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. The results indicate that although economic benefits were achieved by herder households in both CGS and RGS, the total production costs spent on each sheep unit in RGS were higher than in the overall that of the total households, and the gross production values produced by herder households from livestock products were lower than in the overall that of the total households due to the difference in production practices. This finding suggests that higher production costs may reduce herders’ adoption rate of RGS. Furthermore, the transfer from CGS to RGS also implies that herders may have to face the challenge the change in production practices related to native grass availability, forage seeding, supplementary feeding, livestock transfer, and grazing duration. The policy implications of these findings towards the implementation of rotational grazing systems are as follows: first, policy makers can consider bringing higher economic advantages to the adopters of rotational grazing systems via incentives; Second, policy measures should assist herders to be able to adapt more easily to the production practices in RGS.","PeriodicalId":91886,"journal":{"name":"International journal of environmental & agriculture research","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of environmental & agriculture research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55375/joar.2023.2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rotational grazing systems (RGS) have been advocated as a superior grazing strategy by the Chinese government based on their significant ecological advantage compared to continuous grazing systems (CGS). In practice, however, due to the low-adoption rate of RGS the favorable effect is limited. This study analyzed the total production cost, gross production value, and net margin of CGS and RGS from the perspective of cost benefits. Data were collected from telephone and face-to-face questionnaire survey of 121 randomly sampled households in Maqu County in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. The results indicate that although economic benefits were achieved by herder households in both CGS and RGS, the total production costs spent on each sheep unit in RGS were higher than in the overall that of the total households, and the gross production values produced by herder households from livestock products were lower than in the overall that of the total households due to the difference in production practices. This finding suggests that higher production costs may reduce herders’ adoption rate of RGS. Furthermore, the transfer from CGS to RGS also implies that herders may have to face the challenge the change in production practices related to native grass availability, forage seeding, supplementary feeding, livestock transfer, and grazing duration. The policy implications of these findings towards the implementation of rotational grazing systems are as follows: first, policy makers can consider bringing higher economic advantages to the adopters of rotational grazing systems via incentives; Second, policy measures should assist herders to be able to adapt more easily to the production practices in RGS.
连续与轮牧制度的成本效益分析——以玛曲县为例
轮牧制度与连续放牧制度相比具有显著的生态优势,已被中国政府提倡为一种优越的放牧战略。但在实际应用中,由于RGS的采用率较低,其良好效果有限。本研究从成本效益的角度分析了CGS和RGS的总生产成本、总产值和净利润率。采用电话和面对面问卷调查的方式,随机抽取青藏高原玛曲县121户家庭进行调查。结果表明,尽管农区牧户均获得了经济效益,但农区牧户每只羊的总生产成本高于农区牧户的总生产成本,且由于生产方式的差异,农区牧户的畜产品生产总值低于农区牧户的总生产总值。这一发现表明,较高的生产成本可能会降低牧民对RGS的采用率。此外,从CGS向RGS的转变还意味着牧民可能不得不面对与本地牧草可用性、饲料播种、补充饲喂、牲畜转移和放牧时间有关的生产实践变化的挑战。这些研究结果对轮牧制度实施的政策意义如下:首先,政策制定者可以考虑通过激励措施为轮牧制度的采用者带来更高的经济优势;其次,政策措施应帮助牧民更容易地适应RGS的生产实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信