Longitudinal changes in home-based arts engagement during and following the first national lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK.

IF 1.1 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
F Bu, H W Mak, J K Bone, D Fancourt
{"title":"Longitudinal changes in home-based arts engagement during and following the first national lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK.","authors":"F Bu, H W Mak, J K Bone, D Fancourt","doi":"10.1177/17579139221080055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to examine potential heterogeneity in longitudinal changes in home-based arts engagement during the first national lockdown and following gradual easing of restrictions in the UK. Furthermore, it sought to explore factors that were associated with patterns of longitudinal changes in home-based arts engagement.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data were from the UCL COVID-19 Social Study. The analytical sample consisted of 29,147 adults in the UK who were followed up for 22 weeks from 21 March to 21 August 2020. Data were analysed using growth mixture models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analyses identified five classes of growth trajectories. There were two stable classes showing little change in arts engagement over time (64.4% in total), two classes showing initial increases in arts engagement followed by declines as restrictions were eased (29.8%), and one class showing slight declines during strict lockdown followed by an increase in arts engagement after the easing of restrictions (5.9%). A range of factors were found to be associated with class membership of these arts engagement trajectories, such as age, gender, education, income, employment status, and health.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is substantial heterogeneity in longitudinal changes in home-based arts engagement. For participants whose engagement changed over time, growth trajectories of arts engagement were related to changes in lockdown measures. These findings suggest that some individuals may have drawn on the arts when they needed them the most, such as during the strict lockdown period, even if they usually had lower levels of arts engagement before the pandemic. Overall, our results indicate the importance of promoting arts engagement during pandemics and periods of lockdown as part of public health campaigns.</p>","PeriodicalId":45561,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Prisoner Health","volume":"2 1","pages":"117-126"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8918873/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Prisoner Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17579139221080055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to examine potential heterogeneity in longitudinal changes in home-based arts engagement during the first national lockdown and following gradual easing of restrictions in the UK. Furthermore, it sought to explore factors that were associated with patterns of longitudinal changes in home-based arts engagement.

Method: Data were from the UCL COVID-19 Social Study. The analytical sample consisted of 29,147 adults in the UK who were followed up for 22 weeks from 21 March to 21 August 2020. Data were analysed using growth mixture models.

Results: Our analyses identified five classes of growth trajectories. There were two stable classes showing little change in arts engagement over time (64.4% in total), two classes showing initial increases in arts engagement followed by declines as restrictions were eased (29.8%), and one class showing slight declines during strict lockdown followed by an increase in arts engagement after the easing of restrictions (5.9%). A range of factors were found to be associated with class membership of these arts engagement trajectories, such as age, gender, education, income, employment status, and health.

Conclusion: There is substantial heterogeneity in longitudinal changes in home-based arts engagement. For participants whose engagement changed over time, growth trajectories of arts engagement were related to changes in lockdown measures. These findings suggest that some individuals may have drawn on the arts when they needed them the most, such as during the strict lockdown period, even if they usually had lower levels of arts engagement before the pandemic. Overall, our results indicate the importance of promoting arts engagement during pandemics and periods of lockdown as part of public health campaigns.

在英国因 COVID-19 大流行而首次全国封锁期间和之后,家庭艺术参与的纵向变化。
目的:本研究旨在探讨在英国第一次全国性封锁期间以及限制逐步放宽之后,家庭艺术参与度纵向变化的潜在异质性。此外,研究还试图探讨与家庭艺术参与的纵向变化模式相关的因素:数据来自 UCL COVID-19 社会研究。分析样本包括 29,147 名英国成年人,他们在 2020 年 3 月 21 日至 8 月 21 日期间接受了为期 22 周的跟踪调查。数据采用生长混合模型进行分析:我们的分析确定了五类成长轨迹。其中两类稳定,表明随着时间的推移艺术参与度变化不大(共占 64.4%),两类表明最初艺术参与度上升,随后随着限制的放松而下降(占 29.8%),一类表明在严格封锁期间艺术参与度略有下降,随后在限制放松后艺术参与度上升(占 5.9%)。研究发现,一系列因素与这些艺术参与轨迹的阶层成员有关,如年龄、性别、教育程度、收入、就业状况和健康状况等:结论:家庭艺术参与的纵向变化存在很大的异质性。对于参与度随时间发生变化的参与者而言,艺术参与度的增长轨迹与封锁措施的变化相关。这些研究结果表明,有些人可能在最需要艺术的时候(比如在严格封锁期间)利用了艺术,即使他们在大流行之前的艺术参与水平通常较低。总之,我们的研究结果表明,作为公共卫生运动的一部分,在大流行病和封锁期间促进艺术参与非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Prisoner Health
International Journal of Prisoner Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
21.40%
发文量
56
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信