Mental health and homelessness in the social service providers' outlook (Luxembourg case)

IF 0.8 Q4 SOCIAL WORK
C. Dujardin, V. Klymchuk, V. Gorbunova
{"title":"Mental health and homelessness in the social service providers' outlook (Luxembourg case)","authors":"C. Dujardin, V. Klymchuk, V. Gorbunova","doi":"10.1108/mhsi-02-2023-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to explore the perception of the mental health problems of the homeless population in a high-income country (Luxembourg) by social service providers and to develop proposals for better inclusion of homeless people into the mental health services and homeless people with mental health issues into society.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe study was of qualitative design and conducted using a semi-structured interview method (in person). The semi-structured interviews (seven participants) were conducted to analyse the challenges, practice approaches and prospects of stakeholders or decision-makers working in housing exclusion and homelessness. A secondary thematic analysis of this content regarding mental health issues was performed.\n\n\nFindings\nThree main themes in the social providers’ perception were identified related to mental health and homelessness: the general view on the mental health problems of homeless people (accent on substance use disorders [SUDs], overshadowing of other mental health conditions by the SUDs); the positive impact of housing and social services on the mental health of the homeless per se (role of social rhythms, social connectedness and multidisciplinary approach are emphasised); and the need for improvement of mental health services in the country (need for the long-term timely continuing mental health support and recognition of the importance of complex intersectional and multidisciplinary solutions).\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nMental health themes were not the primary focus while research was planned and conducted. They were revealed as results of secondary qualitative data analysis. Therefore, additional mental health-focused mixed methods research is needed to verify the conclusions. The paper is written on the results of the research project “Social Housing and Homelessness” (SOHOME), implemented at the University of Luxembourg with the financial support of the Fonds National de la Recherche of Luxembourg (FNR12626464). The sponsor had no involvement in the study design, the collection, analysis and interpretation of data or the preparation of the paper.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe study brings together different perspectives from social workers, stakeholders and decision-makers. The results show that there are cross-field connections between homelessness and mental health that require specialised and coordinated services. The first existing approaches seem to be promising in their continuation but need to be promoted by social policy.\n\n\nSocial implications\nTo promote social cohesion in the Luxembourgish society and also to include one of the most vulnerable people, the study points to the importance of the link between homelessness and compromised mental health. Appropriate support and service provision as well as social and affordable housing play a central role.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first of its kind, revealing several social work stakeholders’ perspective on the mental health of homeless people in Luxembourg.\n","PeriodicalId":44476,"journal":{"name":"Mental Health and Social Inclusion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Health and Social Inclusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mhsi-02-2023-0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the perception of the mental health problems of the homeless population in a high-income country (Luxembourg) by social service providers and to develop proposals for better inclusion of homeless people into the mental health services and homeless people with mental health issues into society. Design/methodology/approach The study was of qualitative design and conducted using a semi-structured interview method (in person). The semi-structured interviews (seven participants) were conducted to analyse the challenges, practice approaches and prospects of stakeholders or decision-makers working in housing exclusion and homelessness. A secondary thematic analysis of this content regarding mental health issues was performed. Findings Three main themes in the social providers’ perception were identified related to mental health and homelessness: the general view on the mental health problems of homeless people (accent on substance use disorders [SUDs], overshadowing of other mental health conditions by the SUDs); the positive impact of housing and social services on the mental health of the homeless per se (role of social rhythms, social connectedness and multidisciplinary approach are emphasised); and the need for improvement of mental health services in the country (need for the long-term timely continuing mental health support and recognition of the importance of complex intersectional and multidisciplinary solutions). Research limitations/implications Mental health themes were not the primary focus while research was planned and conducted. They were revealed as results of secondary qualitative data analysis. Therefore, additional mental health-focused mixed methods research is needed to verify the conclusions. The paper is written on the results of the research project “Social Housing and Homelessness” (SOHOME), implemented at the University of Luxembourg with the financial support of the Fonds National de la Recherche of Luxembourg (FNR12626464). The sponsor had no involvement in the study design, the collection, analysis and interpretation of data or the preparation of the paper. Practical implications The study brings together different perspectives from social workers, stakeholders and decision-makers. The results show that there are cross-field connections between homelessness and mental health that require specialised and coordinated services. The first existing approaches seem to be promising in their continuation but need to be promoted by social policy. Social implications To promote social cohesion in the Luxembourgish society and also to include one of the most vulnerable people, the study points to the importance of the link between homelessness and compromised mental health. Appropriate support and service provision as well as social and affordable housing play a central role. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first of its kind, revealing several social work stakeholders’ perspective on the mental health of homeless people in Luxembourg.
社会服务提供者展望中的心理健康和无家可归问题(卢森堡案例)
目的本文的目的是探讨社会服务提供者对高收入国家(卢森堡)无家可归人口的心理健康问题的看法,并制定建议,以便更好地将无家可归者纳入心理健康服务,并将有心理健康问题的无家可归者纳入社会。设计/方法/方法本研究采用定性设计,并采用半结构化访谈法(亲自)进行。进行了半结构化访谈(七名参与者),以分析在住房排斥和无家可归问题上工作的利益相关者或决策者的挑战、实践方法和前景。对这一内容进行了关于心理健康问题的次要专题分析。调查结果社会服务提供者的看法中确定了与心理健康和无家可归有关的三个主题:对无家可归者心理健康问题的一般看法(强调物质使用障碍[SUDs],其他心理健康状况因SUDs而失色);住房和社会服务对无家可归者本身的心理健康的积极影响(强调社会节奏、社会联系和多学科方法的作用);需要改善该国的精神卫生服务(需要长期、及时、持续的精神卫生支持,并认识到复杂的交叉和多学科解决方案的重要性)。研究局限性/意义在计划和开展研究时,心理健康主题不是主要重点。它们是二级定性数据分析的结果。因此,需要进一步以心理健康为重点的混合方法研究来验证这些结论。本文是根据卢森堡大学在卢森堡国家研究基金会(FNR12626464)的财政支持下实施的“社会住房和无家可归”研究项目(SOHOME)的结果撰写的。主办方没有参与研究设计、数据的收集、分析和解释或论文的准备。实际意义该研究汇集了社会工作者、利益相关者和决策者的不同观点。结果表明,无家可归和心理健康之间存在跨领域联系,需要专门和协调的服务。现有的第一个办法似乎有希望继续下去,但需要社会政策加以促进。为了促进卢森堡社会的社会凝聚力,也为了将最弱势群体纳入其中,该研究指出了无家可归与心理健康受损之间联系的重要性。适当的支持和服务提供以及社会和负担得起的住房发挥着核心作用。原创性/价值据作者所知,这项研究是同类研究中的第一次,揭示了几个社会工作利益相关者对卢森堡无家可归者心理健康的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信