Can area delimitation and tube type impact microshear bond strength of adhesives to dental substrates?

C. W. Pires, T. Lenzi, F. Soares, A. F. Montagner, R. Rocha
{"title":"Can area delimitation and tube type impact microshear bond strength of adhesives to dental substrates?","authors":"C. W. Pires, T. Lenzi, F. Soares, A. F. Montagner, R. Rocha","doi":"10.46919/archv4n1-029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background he need of delimiting the bonding area on microshear bond strength (µSBS) test remains an unclear issue. In addition, there are different types of tube to perform the resin composite cylinders on µSBS test. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the adhesive area delimitation and type of tube used to build up specimens for µSBS testing of adhesive systems, to enamel and dentin.  Methods 120 bovine incisors were ground to achieve flat buccal enamel (n=60) and dentin (n=60) surfaces. Specimens of each substrate were randomly allocated into 6 groups (n=10) according to the adhesive system-a two-step self-etch (Clearfil SE Bond) and a universal adhesive (Scotchbond Universal Adhesive) applied in the self-etch and etch-and-rinse modes– and type of tube used to build up the specimens: starch and polyethylene. 4 resin composite cylinders (Filtek Z250) were made on each surface; in 2 of them the area delimitation was performed. The specimens were subjected to µSBS test after 24 h of water storage at 37°C. Data were submitted to three-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc tests (α=0.05). Results The delimitation of the adhesive area did not influence on the bond strength to dentin (p=0.349) nor to enamel (p=0.158). The type of tube differently affected the ranking of adhesives in both substrates. Conclusions The delimitation of the adhesive area does not influence on the µSBS to enamel and dentin, irrespective of the tube type used to build up the resin composite specimens. The tube type’s impact on the bond strength depends on the dental substrate and adhesive system.","PeriodicalId":8368,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Health Investigation","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Health Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46919/archv4n1-029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background he need of delimiting the bonding area on microshear bond strength (µSBS) test remains an unclear issue. In addition, there are different types of tube to perform the resin composite cylinders on µSBS test. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the adhesive area delimitation and type of tube used to build up specimens for µSBS testing of adhesive systems, to enamel and dentin.  Methods 120 bovine incisors were ground to achieve flat buccal enamel (n=60) and dentin (n=60) surfaces. Specimens of each substrate were randomly allocated into 6 groups (n=10) according to the adhesive system-a two-step self-etch (Clearfil SE Bond) and a universal adhesive (Scotchbond Universal Adhesive) applied in the self-etch and etch-and-rinse modes– and type of tube used to build up the specimens: starch and polyethylene. 4 resin composite cylinders (Filtek Z250) were made on each surface; in 2 of them the area delimitation was performed. The specimens were subjected to µSBS test after 24 h of water storage at 37°C. Data were submitted to three-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc tests (α=0.05). Results The delimitation of the adhesive area did not influence on the bond strength to dentin (p=0.349) nor to enamel (p=0.158). The type of tube differently affected the ranking of adhesives in both substrates. Conclusions The delimitation of the adhesive area does not influence on the µSBS to enamel and dentin, irrespective of the tube type used to build up the resin composite specimens. The tube type’s impact on the bond strength depends on the dental substrate and adhesive system.
区域划分和管型是否会影响粘合剂与牙科基质的微剪切结合强度?
背景微剪切粘接强度(µSBS)试验中是否需要划分粘接区域仍是一个不明确的问题。此外,还有不同类型的管来执行树脂复合圆柱体上的µSBS测试。本研究的目的是评估粘接区域划分和用于建立粘接系统微SBS测试标本的管的类型对牙釉质和牙本质的影响。方法对120个牛切牙进行磨面处理,使其牙本质和牙釉质表面平整。每种基材的样品根据粘合剂系统随机分为6组(n=10) -两步自蚀刻(Clearfil SE Bond)和一种通用粘合剂(Scotchbond universal adhesive),用于自蚀刻和蚀刻-冲洗模式-以及用于构建样品的管道类型:淀粉和聚乙烯。每个表面制作4个树脂复合圆柱体(Filtek Z250);其中2例进行了区域划分。37°C水保存24 h后进行µSBS测试。数据采用三因素方差分析和Tukey事后检验(α=0.05)。结果黏附区域的划分对牙本质和牙釉质的黏附强度无显著影响(p=0.349)。管的类型对两种基材中胶粘剂的等级有不同的影响。结论粘接区域的划分不影响粘接区域对牙本质和牙釉质的粘接效果。管型对粘接强度的影响取决于牙基和粘接系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信