Who Are Our First‑Year At‑Risk Humanities Students? A Reflection on a First‑Year Survey Administered by the Wits Faculty of Humanities Teaching and Learning Unit in 2015 and 2016

Genevieve Hundermark
{"title":"Who Are Our First‑Year At‑Risk Humanities Students? A Reflection on a First‑Year Survey Administered by the Wits Faculty of Humanities Teaching and Learning Unit in 2015 and 2016","authors":"Genevieve Hundermark","doi":"10.24085/JSAA.V6I2.3311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Do we really know who our students are as they enter university? This was the question that the Faculty of Humanities at the University of the Witwatersrand was grappling with. In response, the Humanities’ Teaching and Learning Unit compiled a registration survey for first‑year students to complete that gives an overview of who our incoming students are. The characteristics surveyed include students’ demographic and personal variables, such as the regions they came from, parental and support influences, time demands, financial and technology considerations, motivation for attending university, reading frequency, and interests. The purpose of the survey was two‑fold: firstly, to understand who our students are in terms of their background; and, secondly, to proactively determine what factors potentially place them at risk academically so that the Teaching and Learning Unit could identify, and direct students to or implement support mechanisms to assist them.  This article reflects on the survey that was conducted in 2015 and 2016 and rather than report on the findings of the survey, looks at how the survey and the “survey practice” adopted can be improved. The aim of this article is to reflect on the process used by the Humanities Teaching and Learning Unit to implement and improve a survey to determine different factors that potentially place first‑year students at risk. Reflecting on this process, as opposed to reporting on the results of the survey, is important because it contributes to an action research process where future praxis is informed by reflection on previous action. This process is helpful to identify survey questions and administration that can be improved so as to gain more accurate data, as well as to identify proactive interventions that can be implemented to address risk factors students present and support students to be successful in their studies.","PeriodicalId":32008,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Student Affairs in Africa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Student Affairs in Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24085/JSAA.V6I2.3311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Do we really know who our students are as they enter university? This was the question that the Faculty of Humanities at the University of the Witwatersrand was grappling with. In response, the Humanities’ Teaching and Learning Unit compiled a registration survey for first‑year students to complete that gives an overview of who our incoming students are. The characteristics surveyed include students’ demographic and personal variables, such as the regions they came from, parental and support influences, time demands, financial and technology considerations, motivation for attending university, reading frequency, and interests. The purpose of the survey was two‑fold: firstly, to understand who our students are in terms of their background; and, secondly, to proactively determine what factors potentially place them at risk academically so that the Teaching and Learning Unit could identify, and direct students to or implement support mechanisms to assist them.  This article reflects on the survey that was conducted in 2015 and 2016 and rather than report on the findings of the survey, looks at how the survey and the “survey practice” adopted can be improved. The aim of this article is to reflect on the process used by the Humanities Teaching and Learning Unit to implement and improve a survey to determine different factors that potentially place first‑year students at risk. Reflecting on this process, as opposed to reporting on the results of the survey, is important because it contributes to an action research process where future praxis is informed by reflection on previous action. This process is helpful to identify survey questions and administration that can be improved so as to gain more accurate data, as well as to identify proactive interventions that can be implemented to address risk factors students present and support students to be successful in their studies.
谁是我们一年级面临风险的人文学科学生?对Wits人文学院2015年和2016年教学单位实施的第一年调查的反思
当学生进入大学时,我们真的知道他们是谁吗?这是威特沃特斯兰德大学(University of the Witwatersrand)人文学院一直在努力解决的问题。作为回应,人文学科的教学和学习部门为一年级学生编制了一份注册调查,让他们完成调查,大致了解我们的新学生是谁。调查的特征包括学生的人口统计和个人变量,如他们来自的地区、父母和支持的影响、时间需求、经济和技术考虑、上大学的动机、阅读频率和兴趣。调查的目的有两个:首先,了解我们学生的背景;其次,主动确定哪些因素可能使他们在学业上面临风险,以便教与学组能够识别,并指导学生或实施支持机制来帮助他们。本文对2015年和2016年进行的调查进行了反思,而不是对调查结果进行报告,而是着眼于如何改进调查和采用的“调查实践”。本文的目的是反思人文学科教学部门实施和改进调查的过程,以确定可能使一年级学生面临风险的不同因素。反思这一过程,而不是报告调查结果,是很重要的,因为它有助于行动研究过程,在行动研究过程中,对以往行动的反思为未来的实践提供了信息。这一过程有助于确定可以改进的调查问题和管理,以获得更准确的数据,并确定可以实施的主动干预措施,以解决学生存在的风险因素,并支持学生在学业上取得成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信