Transient Multiphase Analysis of Well Trajectory Effects in Production of Horizontal Unconventional Wells

Ngoc Tran, H. Karami
{"title":"Transient Multiphase Analysis of Well Trajectory Effects in Production of Horizontal Unconventional Wells","authors":"Ngoc Tran, H. Karami","doi":"10.2118/195230-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The effects of horizontal well geometry remain debatable in most production modeling works. Most of recent reports fail to mention the effects of well geometries, especially in severe slugging cases. This study presents a qualitative comparison between different well geometries and their impacts in production performance of horizontal wells.\n The study utilizes a transient multiphase simulator to mimic the production from a horizontal well over a 12-hour period. The well has a 2-7/8″ ID tubing with TVD of approximately 5000 ft and MD of 10000 ft and maximum inclination angle of 10º within the horizontal section. The trajectories of horizontal section in the well include 5 cases, 5 undulations, hump (one undulation upward), sump (one undulation downward), toe-up and toe-down. These configurations are the representative examples of horizontal wells. A reservoir with a given deliverability equation and several perforation stages is used to provide well inflow. The impacts of reservoir deliverability, GOR, pressure and temperature are studied for all well geometries.\n The simulation results offer some valuable insights into the effects of well trajectory on production performance, including borehole pressure profile, liquid holdup, gas and liquid rate variations with time, and cumulative gas and liquid production. At high production rates, severe slugging is not observed, and thus, the well geometry effects are minimized with a consistent production at the surface. However, toe-up configuration exhibits a slightly better performance than the others.\n As the productivity and pressure reduces throughout the life of a well, the impacts of well trajectories become clearer. The presence of severe slugs and blockage of perforations near the toes causes a noticeable drop in production. During severe slugging, the pressure profile reveals longer fluctuation cycles, resulting in extreme separator flooding issues. The slugging frequencies are compared among different well geometries. Toe-down case exhibits lower slugging severity. As a result, toe-down well produces the highest cumulative liquid and gas rates. The presence of liquid blockage is observed in lateral and curvature sections. The toe-up and hump configurations exhibit the most severe slugs with minimum cumulative gas and liquid productions. The differences in productions among well trajectories exceed 30% under different well configurations.\n With the augmented growth of production from unconventional reservoirs, horizontal well technology has grown in oil and gas industry, yet study of well geometry in production system remains to be limited. This study is a unique effort to optimize well configuration and perforation placement in order to alleviate multiphase flow problems in the wellbore. Providing the practical potential on simulation works, this study provides a predictive guidline to connect well geometry selection and production optimization.","PeriodicalId":11150,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, April 10, 2019","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, April 10, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/195230-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The effects of horizontal well geometry remain debatable in most production modeling works. Most of recent reports fail to mention the effects of well geometries, especially in severe slugging cases. This study presents a qualitative comparison between different well geometries and their impacts in production performance of horizontal wells. The study utilizes a transient multiphase simulator to mimic the production from a horizontal well over a 12-hour period. The well has a 2-7/8″ ID tubing with TVD of approximately 5000 ft and MD of 10000 ft and maximum inclination angle of 10º within the horizontal section. The trajectories of horizontal section in the well include 5 cases, 5 undulations, hump (one undulation upward), sump (one undulation downward), toe-up and toe-down. These configurations are the representative examples of horizontal wells. A reservoir with a given deliverability equation and several perforation stages is used to provide well inflow. The impacts of reservoir deliverability, GOR, pressure and temperature are studied for all well geometries. The simulation results offer some valuable insights into the effects of well trajectory on production performance, including borehole pressure profile, liquid holdup, gas and liquid rate variations with time, and cumulative gas and liquid production. At high production rates, severe slugging is not observed, and thus, the well geometry effects are minimized with a consistent production at the surface. However, toe-up configuration exhibits a slightly better performance than the others. As the productivity and pressure reduces throughout the life of a well, the impacts of well trajectories become clearer. The presence of severe slugs and blockage of perforations near the toes causes a noticeable drop in production. During severe slugging, the pressure profile reveals longer fluctuation cycles, resulting in extreme separator flooding issues. The slugging frequencies are compared among different well geometries. Toe-down case exhibits lower slugging severity. As a result, toe-down well produces the highest cumulative liquid and gas rates. The presence of liquid blockage is observed in lateral and curvature sections. The toe-up and hump configurations exhibit the most severe slugs with minimum cumulative gas and liquid productions. The differences in productions among well trajectories exceed 30% under different well configurations. With the augmented growth of production from unconventional reservoirs, horizontal well technology has grown in oil and gas industry, yet study of well geometry in production system remains to be limited. This study is a unique effort to optimize well configuration and perforation placement in order to alleviate multiphase flow problems in the wellbore. Providing the practical potential on simulation works, this study provides a predictive guidline to connect well geometry selection and production optimization.
非常规水平井生产中井眼轨迹效应的瞬态多相分析
在大多数生产建模工作中,水平井几何形状的影响仍然存在争议。最近的大多数报告都没有提到井的几何形状的影响,特别是在严重的段塞流情况下。本文对不同井型对水平井生产动态的影响进行了定性比较。该研究利用一个瞬态多相模拟器来模拟一口水平井在12小时内的生产情况。该井采用2-7/8″内径油管,TVD约为5000英尺,MD为10000英尺,水平段最大倾角为10º。水平井段轨迹包括5段、5个波动、驼峰(1个向上波动)、凹陷(1个向下波动)、上、下。这些配置是水平井的典型例子。一个油藏具有给定的产能方程和几个射孔阶段来提供井流入。研究了所有井型对储层产能、GOR、压力和温度的影响。模拟结果为井眼轨迹对生产动态的影响提供了一些有价值的见解,包括井眼压力剖面、液含率、气液速率随时间的变化以及累积气液产量。在高产量时,没有观察到严重的段塞流,因此,井的几何形状影响最小,地面的产量保持一致。但是,toup配置表现出比其他配置稍好的性能。在井的整个生命周期中,随着产能和压力的降低,井眼轨迹的影响变得更加明显。严重的段塞和趾部附近射孔堵塞会导致产量明显下降。在严重的段塞流中,压力分布显示出更长的波动周期,导致分离器发生严重的水淹问题。比较了不同井型的段塞频率。脚趾朝下的情况显示出较低的段塞严重程度。因此,下斜井的累积液气产量最高。在横向和曲率剖面上观察到液体堵塞的存在。向上和驼峰结构的段塞最严重,累积气液产量最小。在不同井型下,井眼轨迹间的产量差异超过30%。随着非常规油藏产量的增加,水平井技术在油气行业中得到了发展,但对生产系统中井的几何形状的研究仍然有限。该研究是一项独特的研究,旨在优化井眼结构和射孔位置,以缓解井筒中的多相流问题。该研究为连接井型选择和产量优化提供了预测指导,为模拟工作提供了实用潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信