Parámetros morfométricos del espermatozoide de alpaca (Vicugna pacos), obtenidos por tres métodos de colección

Nancy Frinee Huanca-Marca, Cesar Domingo Ordoñez-Rodríguez, H. A. Quispe-Ccasa, W. Antezana-Julian, Luis Alipio Jordan-Misme, Enrique Ampuero-Casquino, Hernán Carlos Cucho-Dolmos
{"title":"Parámetros morfométricos del espermatozoide de alpaca (Vicugna pacos), obtenidos por tres métodos de colección","authors":"Nancy Frinee Huanca-Marca, Cesar Domingo Ordoñez-Rodríguez, H. A. Quispe-Ccasa, W. Antezana-Julian, Luis Alipio Jordan-Misme, Enrique Ampuero-Casquino, Hernán Carlos Cucho-Dolmos","doi":"10.36610/j.jsaas.2020.070200050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sperm morphology is essential in evaluating seminal quality and important for fertility prediction in breeding males. The aim of this study was to compare the morphometric parameters of alpaca sperm, collected using three methods of semen extraction, recovery of the vas deferens (DCD), electro ejaculation (EE) and vaginal aspira-tion (VA). The collection was made of 3 animals by each method. The mobility, concentration, vitality, mem-brane functionality and sperm morphometry parameters were determined in a computerized semen analysis kit – ISAS® CASA - Morph. For morphometric parameters, semen samples were processed with a Hemacolor® stain-ing kit and viewed under a phase-contrast microscope. For each sample, at least 200 sperm were captured at random, with an image resolution of 0.08 μm per pixel on the horizontal and vertical axes. The comparison of the morphometric parameters between the collection method and the animal was carried out using a random block design. Total motility was 16.27±11.96%, 14.68±11.21% and 12.44±7.27%; the sperm concentration of 247±186.70x106EPZ/mL, 67.92±67.92x106EPZ/mL and 100.32±56.13x106EPZ/mL, the vitality was 62.86 ±15.92%, 63±15.21% and 70.16±14.33% in sperm collected by DCD, EE and AV respectively. Regarding the morphometric parameters, a length of 5.49±0.43μm, 5.53±0.41μm and 5.75±0.53μm was found, area 14.30±2.00 μm2, 15.05±1.77 μm2 and 15.88±2.00 μm2, perimeter of 16.10±1.31μm, 17.11±1.20μm and 17.41 ± 1.43, width of 3.22±0.27μm, 3.30±0.32μm and 3.33±0.25μm and the acrosome percentage of 52.22±7.82μm, 49.52±7.47μm and 47.44±5.77μm in sperm collected by DCD, EE and AV respectively. The morphometric parameters of the size and shape of the sperm head and the intermediate piece showed significant statistical differences (p <0.01) between the collection methods and between the animals. In conclusion, the morphometric parameters of alpaca spermatozoa were influenced by collection method, and show variations between animals.","PeriodicalId":31533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Selva Andina Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Selva Andina Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36610/j.jsaas.2020.070200050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sperm morphology is essential in evaluating seminal quality and important for fertility prediction in breeding males. The aim of this study was to compare the morphometric parameters of alpaca sperm, collected using three methods of semen extraction, recovery of the vas deferens (DCD), electro ejaculation (EE) and vaginal aspira-tion (VA). The collection was made of 3 animals by each method. The mobility, concentration, vitality, mem-brane functionality and sperm morphometry parameters were determined in a computerized semen analysis kit – ISAS® CASA - Morph. For morphometric parameters, semen samples were processed with a Hemacolor® stain-ing kit and viewed under a phase-contrast microscope. For each sample, at least 200 sperm were captured at random, with an image resolution of 0.08 μm per pixel on the horizontal and vertical axes. The comparison of the morphometric parameters between the collection method and the animal was carried out using a random block design. Total motility was 16.27±11.96%, 14.68±11.21% and 12.44±7.27%; the sperm concentration of 247±186.70x106EPZ/mL, 67.92±67.92x106EPZ/mL and 100.32±56.13x106EPZ/mL, the vitality was 62.86 ±15.92%, 63±15.21% and 70.16±14.33% in sperm collected by DCD, EE and AV respectively. Regarding the morphometric parameters, a length of 5.49±0.43μm, 5.53±0.41μm and 5.75±0.53μm was found, area 14.30±2.00 μm2, 15.05±1.77 μm2 and 15.88±2.00 μm2, perimeter of 16.10±1.31μm, 17.11±1.20μm and 17.41 ± 1.43, width of 3.22±0.27μm, 3.30±0.32μm and 3.33±0.25μm and the acrosome percentage of 52.22±7.82μm, 49.52±7.47μm and 47.44±5.77μm in sperm collected by DCD, EE and AV respectively. The morphometric parameters of the size and shape of the sperm head and the intermediate piece showed significant statistical differences (p <0.01) between the collection methods and between the animals. In conclusion, the morphometric parameters of alpaca spermatozoa were influenced by collection method, and show variations between animals.
采用三种收集方法测定羊驼精子形态参数
精子形态是评价精子质量的基础,也是预测雄性繁殖能力的重要依据。本研究的目的是比较羊驼精液提取、输精管回收(DCD)、电射精(EE)和阴道抽吸(VA)三种方法采集的精子形态计量学参数。每种方法采集3只动物。在计算机化精液分析试剂盒- ISAS®CASA - Morph中测定精子的流动性、浓度、活力、膜功能和形态测定参数。对于形态学参数,精液样本用Hemacolor®染色试剂盒处理,并在相差显微镜下观察。对于每个样本,随机捕获至少200个精子,在水平和垂直轴上的图像分辨率为每像素0.08 μm。采用随机区组设计比较采集方法与动物的形态计量学参数。总运动性分别为16.27±11.96%、14.68±11.21%和12.44±7.27%;DCD、EE和AV采集的精子浓度分别为247±186.70x106EPZ/mL、67.92±67.92 x106epz /mL和100.32±56.13x106EPZ/mL,活力分别为62.86±15.92%、63±15.21%和70.16±14.33%。在形态计量学参数方面,DCD、EE和AV采集的精子长度分别为5.49±0.43μm、5.53±0.41μm和5.75±0.53μm,面积分别为14.30±2.00 μm2、15.05±1.77 μm2和15.88±2.00 μm2,周长分别为16.10±1.31μm、17.11±1.20μm和17.41±1.43 μm,宽度分别为3.22±0.27μm、3.30±0.32μm和3.33±0.25μm,顶体百分率分别为52.22±7.82μm、49.52±7.47μm和47.44±5.77μm。精子头和中间片的大小、形状的形态计量学参数在不同采集方式和不同动物之间差异有统计学意义(p <0.01)。综上所述,羊驼精子的形态计量学参数受采集方法的影响,且在不同动物之间存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信