{"title":"Sujet, narcissisme et infini","authors":"A. Cavazzini, J. Matthys","doi":"10.5840/SYMPOSIUM20192318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cet article discute, à travers le parcours critique d’un récent ouvrage d’Anselm Jappe, la thèse d’une illimitation « narcissique » constitutive de la forme subjective propre aux rapports de production capitalistes contemporains. Montrant que cette perspective est fondée sur une conception monolithique et unilatérale de l’histoire du capital et de ses sujets, ainsi que sur une réduction illégitime de toute forme d’ininité au « mauvais inini » de l’illimitation, nous soutenons la nécessité de penser un infini positif irréductible tant à l’illimitation abstraite de la valorisation qu’aux dispositifs capitalistes qui limitent les puissances d’autodétermination et d’autoactivation des individus.This article critically discusses the thesis, recently developed by Anselm Jappe, of a “narcissistic” illimitation constitutive of the subjective form typical of contemporary capitalist relations of production. By showing that this perspective is grounded on a monolithic and one-sided conception of the history of capital and its subjects, as well as on an illegitimate reduction of every form of infinity to the “bad infinity” of illimitation, we defend the necessity to conceive a positive form of infinity, irreducible to both the abstract illimitation of valorization and the capitalist apparatuses that limit the individual power of self-determination and self-activity.","PeriodicalId":34988,"journal":{"name":"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/SYMPOSIUM20192318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cet article discute, à travers le parcours critique d’un récent ouvrage d’Anselm Jappe, la thèse d’une illimitation « narcissique » constitutive de la forme subjective propre aux rapports de production capitalistes contemporains. Montrant que cette perspective est fondée sur une conception monolithique et unilatérale de l’histoire du capital et de ses sujets, ainsi que sur une réduction illégitime de toute forme d’ininité au « mauvais inini » de l’illimitation, nous soutenons la nécessité de penser un infini positif irréductible tant à l’illimitation abstraite de la valorisation qu’aux dispositifs capitalistes qui limitent les puissances d’autodétermination et d’autoactivation des individus.This article critically discusses the thesis, recently developed by Anselm Jappe, of a “narcissistic” illimitation constitutive of the subjective form typical of contemporary capitalist relations of production. By showing that this perspective is grounded on a monolithic and one-sided conception of the history of capital and its subjects, as well as on an illegitimate reduction of every form of infinity to the “bad infinity” of illimitation, we defend the necessity to conceive a positive form of infinity, irreducible to both the abstract illimitation of valorization and the capitalist apparatuses that limit the individual power of self-determination and self-activity.
本文通过安瑟姆·贾普(anselm Jappe)最近的一本书的批判性路径,讨论了构成当代资本主义生产关系主观形式的“自恋”无限的论点。展示设计,这种观点是基于新石器时代和历史的单方面增资和臣民的还原,以及对任何形式的非法信息不好向«initéinini l’illimitation»,我们需要一个积极的无限思考既不可约的抽象l’illimitation只回收装置限制个人的自决和d’autoactivation列强的资本家。本文批判性地讨论了安瑟姆·贾普(Anselm Jappe)最近提出的“自恋”无限构成当代资本主义生产关系主观形式的论点。By山峦that this is grounded视角据monolithic and of the history of capital and its one-sided设计的魂,as well as on an减少illegitimate of叫form of无限to the“无极”of bad illimitation《我们的辩护,担心正面a form of无限远,不要(irreducible to elod both the文摘illimitation of液化and the的apparatuses that the power of自决问题self-activity个人限制。