Artists as catalysts: the ethical and political possibilities of teaching artists in literacy classrooms

IF 0.8 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Anne Crampton, C. Lewis
{"title":"Artists as catalysts: the ethical and political possibilities of teaching artists in literacy classrooms","authors":"Anne Crampton, C. Lewis","doi":"10.1108/etpc-11-2019-0154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to discuss the ethical and political possibilities offered by the presence of teaching artists (TAs) and visual artwork in racially and culturally diverse high school literacy (English Language Arts) classrooms.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study explores episodes from two separate ethnographic studies that were conducted in one teacher’s critical literacy classroom across a span of several years. This study uses a transliteracies approach (Stornaiulo et al., 2017) to think about “meaning-making at the intersection of human subjects and materials” (Kontovourki et al., 2019); the study also draws on critical scholarship on art and making (Ngo et al., 2017; Vossoughi et al., 2016). The TA, along with the materials and processes of artmaking, decentered the teacher and literacy itself, inviting in new social realities.\n\n\nFindings\nTAs’ collective interpretation of existing artwork and construction of new works made visible how both human and nonhuman bodies co-produced “new ways of feeling and being with others” (Zembylas, 2017, p. 402). This study views these artists as catalysts capable of provoking, or productively disrupting, the everyday practices of classrooms.\n\n\nSocial implications\nBoth studies demonstrated new ways of feeling, being and thinking about difference, bringing to the forefront momentary possibilities and impossibilities of complex human and nonhuman intra-actions. The provocations flowing from the visual artwork and the dialogue swirling around the work presented opportunities for emergent and unexpected experiences of literacy learning.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis work is valuable in exploring the boundaries of literacy learning with the serious inclusion of visual art in an English classroom. When the TAs guided both interpretation and production of artwork, they affected and were affected by the becoming happening in the classroom. This study suggests how teaching bodies, students and artwork pushed the transformative potential of everyday school settings.\n","PeriodicalId":45885,"journal":{"name":"English Teaching-Practice and Critique","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Teaching-Practice and Critique","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/etpc-11-2019-0154","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to discuss the ethical and political possibilities offered by the presence of teaching artists (TAs) and visual artwork in racially and culturally diverse high school literacy (English Language Arts) classrooms. Design/methodology/approach This study explores episodes from two separate ethnographic studies that were conducted in one teacher’s critical literacy classroom across a span of several years. This study uses a transliteracies approach (Stornaiulo et al., 2017) to think about “meaning-making at the intersection of human subjects and materials” (Kontovourki et al., 2019); the study also draws on critical scholarship on art and making (Ngo et al., 2017; Vossoughi et al., 2016). The TA, along with the materials and processes of artmaking, decentered the teacher and literacy itself, inviting in new social realities. Findings TAs’ collective interpretation of existing artwork and construction of new works made visible how both human and nonhuman bodies co-produced “new ways of feeling and being with others” (Zembylas, 2017, p. 402). This study views these artists as catalysts capable of provoking, or productively disrupting, the everyday practices of classrooms. Social implications Both studies demonstrated new ways of feeling, being and thinking about difference, bringing to the forefront momentary possibilities and impossibilities of complex human and nonhuman intra-actions. The provocations flowing from the visual artwork and the dialogue swirling around the work presented opportunities for emergent and unexpected experiences of literacy learning. Originality/value This work is valuable in exploring the boundaries of literacy learning with the serious inclusion of visual art in an English classroom. When the TAs guided both interpretation and production of artwork, they affected and were affected by the becoming happening in the classroom. This study suggests how teaching bodies, students and artwork pushed the transformative potential of everyday school settings.
艺术家作为催化剂:在扫盲课堂上教授艺术家的伦理和政治可能性
目的本研究旨在探讨在种族和文化多样化的高中扫盲(英语语言艺术)课堂中,教学艺术家(TAs)和视觉艺术作品的存在所提供的伦理和政治可能性。设计/方法/方法本研究探讨了两项独立的民族志研究的片段,这两项研究是在一位教师的批判性识字课堂上进行的,历时数年。本研究使用音译方法(Stornaiulo等人,2017)来思考“人类主体和材料交叉点的意义制造”(Kontovourki等人,2019);该研究还借鉴了关于艺术和制作的批判性奖学金(Ngo et al., 2017;vosoughi et al., 2016)。助教,连同艺术创作的材料和过程,将教师和文化本身去中心化,引入新的社会现实。FindingsTAs对现有艺术作品的集体诠释和新作品的构建,使人类和非人类的身体如何共同产生“新的感觉和与他人相处的方式”(Zembylas, 2017, p. 402)变得清晰可见。这项研究将这些艺术家视为催化剂,能够激发或有效地破坏教室的日常实践。社会意义这两项研究都展示了感受、存在和思考差异的新方式,将复杂的人类和非人类内部行为的瞬间可能性和不可能性带到最前沿。从视觉艺术作品中流出的挑衅和围绕作品的对话为出现和意想不到的识字学习体验提供了机会。原创性/价值这项工作在探索识字学习的边界方面很有价值,它将视觉艺术严肃地纳入英语课堂。当助教指导艺术作品的解释和制作时,他们影响着课堂上发生的变化,也被这些变化所影响。这项研究表明,教学机构、学生和艺术作品是如何推动日常学校环境的变革潜力的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: English Teaching: Practice and Critique seeks to promote research and theory related to English literacy that is grounded in a range of contexts: classrooms, schools and wider educational constituencies. The journal has as its main focus English teaching in L1 settings. Submissions focused on EFL will be considered only if they have clear pertinence to English literacy in L1 settings. It provides a place where authors from a range of backgrounds can identify matters of common concern and thereby foster broad professional communities and networks. Where possible, English Teaching: Practice and Critique encourages comparative approaches to topics and issues. The journal published three types of manuscripts: research articles, essays (theoretical papers, reviews, and responses), and teacher narratives. Often special issues of the journal focus on distinct topics; however, unthemed manuscript submissions are always welcome and published in most issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信