Effectiveness of Lactulose for Colonoscopy Preparation in Adults:A Meta-Analysis

Weiwen Shi, Jiapeng Zhang, Ping Liu
{"title":"Effectiveness of Lactulose for Colonoscopy Preparation in Adults:A Meta-Analysis","authors":"Weiwen Shi, Jiapeng Zhang, Ping Liu","doi":"10.6913/mrhk.050104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate the effects of lactulose for bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy in adults. Methods: By searching for literature pertaining to RCT (randomized controlled trial) of bowel preparation with lactulose in adults up to 10th of July, 2021. The experimental group utilizes lactulose oral solution as the solution of choice for bowel preparation while the control group uses the standard bowel preparation solution. Literature selection and data extraction were completed independently by 2 researchers, including literature quality control. Data analysis was completed using the software RevMan5.2. Results: 11 RCT was included for data analysis. Meta-analysis showed that the lactulose group had a lower incidence of adverse effects [OR=13.58, 95CI% (6.10, 30.24), p<0.0001] and better tolerability [OR=13.58, 95CI% (6.10,30.24), p<0.0001] when compared with the control group. However, the bowel cleanliness was statistically insignificant between the two groups [WMD=0.26,95%CI (-0.31,0.82), p=0.38]. Conclusion: according to current evidences, as a solution for bower preparation, lactulose has a lower incidence of adverse effects such as emesis or diarrhea, while effectively increasing tolerability, however it is not a superior solution for bowel preparation in terms of bowel cleanliness when compared with other standard choices. More high quality researches will be required to support its use.","PeriodicalId":50132,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Research","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6913/mrhk.050104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effects of lactulose for bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy in adults. Methods: By searching for literature pertaining to RCT (randomized controlled trial) of bowel preparation with lactulose in adults up to 10th of July, 2021. The experimental group utilizes lactulose oral solution as the solution of choice for bowel preparation while the control group uses the standard bowel preparation solution. Literature selection and data extraction were completed independently by 2 researchers, including literature quality control. Data analysis was completed using the software RevMan5.2. Results: 11 RCT was included for data analysis. Meta-analysis showed that the lactulose group had a lower incidence of adverse effects [OR=13.58, 95CI% (6.10, 30.24), p<0.0001] and better tolerability [OR=13.58, 95CI% (6.10,30.24), p<0.0001] when compared with the control group. However, the bowel cleanliness was statistically insignificant between the two groups [WMD=0.26,95%CI (-0.31,0.82), p=0.38]. Conclusion: according to current evidences, as a solution for bower preparation, lactulose has a lower incidence of adverse effects such as emesis or diarrhea, while effectively increasing tolerability, however it is not a superior solution for bowel preparation in terms of bowel cleanliness when compared with other standard choices. More high quality researches will be required to support its use.
乳果糖用于成人结肠镜检查准备的有效性:一项荟萃分析
目的:评价乳果糖在成人结肠镜检查前肠道准备中的作用。方法:通过检索截至2021年7月10日的成人乳果糖肠道准备的RCT(随机对照试验)相关文献。实验组采用乳果糖口服溶液作为肠道准备的首选溶液,对照组采用标准肠道准备溶液。文献选择和数据提取由2名研究者独立完成,包括文献质量控制。数据分析采用RevMan5.2软件完成。结果:纳入11项RCT进行数据分析。meta分析显示,乳果糖组不良反应发生率较对照组低[OR=13.58, 95CI% (6.10,30.24), p<0.0001],耐受性较对照组好[OR=13.58, 95CI% (6.10,30.24), p<0.0001]。但两组患者肠道清洁度差异无统计学意义[WMD=0.26,95%CI (-0.31,0.82), p=0.38]。结论:根据目前的证据,乳果糖作为肠道制剂溶液,其呕吐、腹泻等不良反应发生率较低,可有效提高耐受性,但在肠道清洁方面,与其他标准选择相比,乳果糖并不是一种更好的肠道制剂。需要更多高质量的研究来支持它的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信