BOS3c.004 Effectiveness of a complex advance care planning intervention focusing on nursing home residents: first results of the cluster-randomized controlled BEVOR-trial

K. Götze, B. Feddersen, E. Hummers, G. Marckmann, F. Nauck, J. Schildmann, A. Zapf, J. in der Schmitten
{"title":"BOS3c.004 Effectiveness of a complex advance care planning intervention focusing on nursing home residents: first results of the cluster-randomized controlled BEVOR-trial","authors":"K. Götze, B. Feddersen, E. Hummers, G. Marckmann, F. Nauck, J. Schildmann, A. Zapf, J. in der Schmitten","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2023-acp.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundFew trials on advance care planning (ACP) have investigated the clinical effect on care consistency with care preferences (3CP) in the nursing home (NH) setting.MethodsBEVOR is a multi-centre, cluster-randomized controlled trial aimed to improve 3CP in NH residents (09/2019–02/2023). A total of 44 NHs from 4 German regions were randomized either to the control group (n=24) or the intervention group (n=24). The complex ACP intervention comprised the offer to lead ACP conversations with qualified facilitators on the individual (resident) level and offers for organizational development and staff education on the institutional (NH) level. Educational ACP modules were offered to emergency medical services, hospitals and other regional players relevant for these residents' medical care.After a run-in phase of the intervention, which was extended due to the Covid19-pandemic from originally 9 to (up to) 18 months, the observation period was 12 months from September 2021 to August 2022. Primary outcome was defined as hospitalization rate, understood as a surrogate parameter for 3CP, collected as anonymous data from all residents of the participating NHs. Main secondary outcome is 3CP, taken from a subset of 892 residents (20.5%) who gave informed consent. To measure 3CP, treatment decisions in potentially life-threatening events (‘care delivered') were identified retrospectively every 3 months from the NH records. Correspondingly, ‘care preferences' were assessed retrospectively, integrating data from residents' files and interviews with residents, proxies and nurses, also taking into account the effected level of shared decision making. Analysis of the primary outcome follows the intention-to-treat principle.ResultsThe main outcomes will be available by the time of the acp-i conference.ConclusionResults of the BEVOR trial will give insights into possible clinical effects of a complex regional ACP intervention.","PeriodicalId":19692,"journal":{"name":"Oral abstracts","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral abstracts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2023-acp.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundFew trials on advance care planning (ACP) have investigated the clinical effect on care consistency with care preferences (3CP) in the nursing home (NH) setting.MethodsBEVOR is a multi-centre, cluster-randomized controlled trial aimed to improve 3CP in NH residents (09/2019–02/2023). A total of 44 NHs from 4 German regions were randomized either to the control group (n=24) or the intervention group (n=24). The complex ACP intervention comprised the offer to lead ACP conversations with qualified facilitators on the individual (resident) level and offers for organizational development and staff education on the institutional (NH) level. Educational ACP modules were offered to emergency medical services, hospitals and other regional players relevant for these residents' medical care.After a run-in phase of the intervention, which was extended due to the Covid19-pandemic from originally 9 to (up to) 18 months, the observation period was 12 months from September 2021 to August 2022. Primary outcome was defined as hospitalization rate, understood as a surrogate parameter for 3CP, collected as anonymous data from all residents of the participating NHs. Main secondary outcome is 3CP, taken from a subset of 892 residents (20.5%) who gave informed consent. To measure 3CP, treatment decisions in potentially life-threatening events (‘care delivered') were identified retrospectively every 3 months from the NH records. Correspondingly, ‘care preferences' were assessed retrospectively, integrating data from residents' files and interviews with residents, proxies and nurses, also taking into account the effected level of shared decision making. Analysis of the primary outcome follows the intention-to-treat principle.ResultsThe main outcomes will be available by the time of the acp-i conference.ConclusionResults of the BEVOR trial will give insights into possible clinical effects of a complex regional ACP intervention.
BOS3c。[4]针对养老院居民的复杂预先护理计划干预的有效性:集群随机对照bevor试验的初步结果
背景:很少有关于预先护理计划(ACP)的试验调查了养老院(NH)环境中护理一致性与护理偏好(3CP)的临床效果。方法bevor是一项旨在改善NH居民3CP的多中心、集群随机对照试验(2019年9月- 2023年2月)。来自德国4个地区的44名NHs患者被随机分为对照组(n=24)和干预组(n=24)。复杂的非加太干预措施包括在个人(驻地)层面上提出领导非加太与合格辅导员的对话,并在机构(NH)层面上提出组织发展和工作人员教育。向紧急医疗服务机构、医院和与这些居民医疗保健有关的其他区域机构提供了教育ACP模块。由于covid - 19大流行,干预的磨合阶段从最初的9个月延长到(最多)18个月,观察期为2021年9月至2022年8月的12个月。主要结局定义为住院率,作为3CP的替代参数,从参与NHs的所有居民中收集匿名数据。主要次要结局是3CP,来自892名知情同意的居民(20.5%)。为了测量3CP,每3个月从NH记录中回顾性地确定潜在危及生命事件的治疗决定(“护理交付”)。相应地,对“护理偏好”进行回顾性评估,整合来自居民档案的数据以及对居民、代理人和护士的访谈,同时考虑到共同决策的影响程度。主要结局的分析遵循意向治疗原则。主要成果将在非加太会议召开前公布。结论:BEVOR试验的结果将为复杂的区域ACP干预可能的临床效果提供见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信