Variability in Clinician Awareness of Intravenous Fluid Administration in Critical Illness: A Prospective Cohort Study

IF 0.5 Q4 PEDIATRICS
Stephen M. Gorga, Alexander L. Sliwicki, J. Sturza, E. Carlton, R. Barbaro, Rajit K. Basu
{"title":"Variability in Clinician Awareness of Intravenous Fluid Administration in Critical Illness: A Prospective Cohort Study","authors":"Stephen M. Gorga, Alexander L. Sliwicki, J. Sturza, E. Carlton, R. Barbaro, Rajit K. Basu","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1758476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Intravenous (IV) fluids are commonly administered to critically ill children, but clinicians lack effective guidance for the correct dose and duration of therapy resulting in variation of prescribing habits which harm children. It is unknown if clinicians recognize the amount of IV fluid that patients receive. We aimed to determine clinician's accuracy in the identification of the volume of IV fluids patients will receive over the next 24 hours. Prospective cohort study enrolled all patients admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) from May to August 2021 at the University of Michigan's C.S. Mott Children's Hospital PICU. For each patient, clinicians estimated the volume of IV fluid that patients will receive in the next 24 hours. The primary outcome was accuracy of the estimation defined as predicted volume of IV fluids versus actual volume administered within 10 mL/kg or 500 mL depending on patient's weight. We tested for differences in accuracy by clinician type using chi-square tests. There were 259 patients for whom 2,295 surveys were completed by 177 clinicians. Clinicians' estimates were accurate 48.8% of the time with a median difference of 10 (1–26) mL/kg. We found that accuracy varied between clinician type: bedside nurses were most accurate at 64.3%, and attendings were least accurate at 30.5%. PICU clinicians have poor recognition of the amount of IV fluids their patients will receive in the subsequent 24-hour period. Estimate accuracy varied by clinician's role and improved over time, which may suggest opportunities for improvement.","PeriodicalId":44426,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1758476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Intravenous (IV) fluids are commonly administered to critically ill children, but clinicians lack effective guidance for the correct dose and duration of therapy resulting in variation of prescribing habits which harm children. It is unknown if clinicians recognize the amount of IV fluid that patients receive. We aimed to determine clinician's accuracy in the identification of the volume of IV fluids patients will receive over the next 24 hours. Prospective cohort study enrolled all patients admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) from May to August 2021 at the University of Michigan's C.S. Mott Children's Hospital PICU. For each patient, clinicians estimated the volume of IV fluid that patients will receive in the next 24 hours. The primary outcome was accuracy of the estimation defined as predicted volume of IV fluids versus actual volume administered within 10 mL/kg or 500 mL depending on patient's weight. We tested for differences in accuracy by clinician type using chi-square tests. There were 259 patients for whom 2,295 surveys were completed by 177 clinicians. Clinicians' estimates were accurate 48.8% of the time with a median difference of 10 (1–26) mL/kg. We found that accuracy varied between clinician type: bedside nurses were most accurate at 64.3%, and attendings were least accurate at 30.5%. PICU clinicians have poor recognition of the amount of IV fluids their patients will receive in the subsequent 24-hour period. Estimate accuracy varied by clinician's role and improved over time, which may suggest opportunities for improvement.
危重疾病患者临床医生静脉输液意识的变异性:一项前瞻性队列研究
静脉输液是危重儿童常用的治疗方法,但临床医生缺乏对正确剂量和治疗时间的有效指导,导致处方习惯的变化,对儿童造成伤害。目前尚不清楚临床医生是否认识到患者接受的静脉输液量。我们的目的是确定临床医生在确定患者在未来24小时内将接受的静脉输液量方面的准确性。前瞻性队列研究纳入了2021年5月至8月在密歇根大学C.S.莫特儿童医院PICU儿科重症监护病房(PICU)住院的所有患者。对于每位患者,临床医生估计患者在接下来的24小时内将接受的静脉输液量。主要结果是估计的准确性,即根据患者的体重,在10 mL/kg或500 mL范围内预测静脉输液量与实际给药量的对比。我们使用卡方检验检验不同临床医生类型的准确性差异。177名临床医生对259名患者完成了2295项调查。临床医生的估计准确率为48.8%,中位差为10 (1-26)mL/kg。我们发现临床医生类型的准确性不同:床边护士的准确性最高,为64.3%,而主治医生的准确性最低,为30.5%。PICU临床医生对患者在随后的24小时内将接受的静脉输液量认识不足。估计的准确性因临床医生的角色而异,并随着时间的推移而提高,这可能表明有改进的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
14.30%
发文量
60
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信