Effectiveness of a shared decision making program during hospitalization due to AECOPD

María Granados Santiago, M. Valenza, Laura López López, Ramón Fernández, Janet Rodríguez Torres, Andrés Calvache Mateo
{"title":"Effectiveness of a shared decision making program during hospitalization due to AECOPD","authors":"María Granados Santiago, M. Valenza, Laura López López, Ramón Fernández, Janet Rodríguez Torres, Andrés Calvache Mateo","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.oa267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Shared decision making (SDM) is a process by which patients are involved in their health care decision. SDM in chronic illness has proved to enhance clinical outcomes at medium term reducing health care cost. Those programs have been not much applied on Asthma patients, but with promising results. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a share decision-making program during Acute Exacerbation of COPD at discharge and 3 months’ follow-up. Methods: The study was designed as a randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized between two intervention groups, one receiving usual care during hospitalization (control group) and the intervention group received an SDM program plus usual care during hospitalization. Knowledge disease was evaluated with COPD-Q, Test Adherence Inhalers (TAI) was using to adherence treatment, Functionality was measured with Functional Independence Measure (FIM), physical activity levels was evaluated with International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), and Euroqol-5D (EQ-5D) was using to perception health status. Results: 42 patients were included. Not significant differences between groups were found at baseline. Both groups showed overall improvements in all outcomes at discharge. Significant differences were found in COPD-Q, TAI, FIM, IPAQ, and EQ-5D (p Conclusion: SDM after 3 months’ hospitalization improved significantly knowledge illness, adherence treatment, functionality, physical activity and health status in COPD patients.","PeriodicalId":76252,"journal":{"name":"Nurses Lamp","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurses Lamp","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.oa267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Shared decision making (SDM) is a process by which patients are involved in their health care decision. SDM in chronic illness has proved to enhance clinical outcomes at medium term reducing health care cost. Those programs have been not much applied on Asthma patients, but with promising results. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a share decision-making program during Acute Exacerbation of COPD at discharge and 3 months’ follow-up. Methods: The study was designed as a randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized between two intervention groups, one receiving usual care during hospitalization (control group) and the intervention group received an SDM program plus usual care during hospitalization. Knowledge disease was evaluated with COPD-Q, Test Adherence Inhalers (TAI) was using to adherence treatment, Functionality was measured with Functional Independence Measure (FIM), physical activity levels was evaluated with International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), and Euroqol-5D (EQ-5D) was using to perception health status. Results: 42 patients were included. Not significant differences between groups were found at baseline. Both groups showed overall improvements in all outcomes at discharge. Significant differences were found in COPD-Q, TAI, FIM, IPAQ, and EQ-5D (p Conclusion: SDM after 3 months’ hospitalization improved significantly knowledge illness, adherence treatment, functionality, physical activity and health status in COPD patients.
AECOPD住院期间共同决策方案的有效性
简介:共同决策(SDM)是一个过程,通过患者参与他们的医疗保健决策。慢性疾病的SDM已被证明可以在中期提高临床结果,降低医疗保健成本。这些项目在哮喘患者身上的应用并不多,但效果很好。目的:本研究的目的是评估慢性阻塞性肺病急性加重出院时共享决策程序的有效性和3个月的随访。方法:采用随机对照试验设计。患者被随机分为两组,一组在住院期间接受常规护理(对照组),干预组在住院期间接受SDM方案加常规护理。采用COPD-Q评价知识疾病,采用试验性依从性吸入器(Test依从性Inhalers, TAI)评价依从性治疗,采用功能独立性量表(FIM)测定功能,采用国际身体活动问卷(IPAQ)评价身体活动水平,采用Euroqol-5D (EQ-5D)评价健康状况。结果:纳入42例患者。基线时各组间无显著差异。两组在出院时的所有结果均有所改善。COPD- q、TAI、FIM、IPAQ、EQ-5D差异均有统计学意义(p)。结论:住院3个月后SDM治疗可显著改善COPD患者的知识疾病、依从性治疗、功能、身体活动和健康状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信