Approaches to the Management of Presumed Immediate Hymenoptera Venom Allergy and Non-Detectable IgE

E. Mingomataj, A. Bakiri
{"title":"Approaches to the Management of Presumed Immediate Hymenoptera Venom Allergy and Non-Detectable IgE","authors":"E. Mingomataj, A. Bakiri","doi":"10.2174/1874838401003010016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To provide a comprehensive evaluation in patients with a convincing history of immediate insect allergy but negative skin test and/or specific IgE results, adequately addressing the question of how best to manage them. Results: Among 43 identified papers only 9 of them presented relevant original data, while the other papers were reviews. In the majority of the cases, the culprit insect was identified with in vitro tests such as Basophil Activation Test, Cellular Allergen Stimulation Test or Western blot, whereas in vivo (less frequently) with sting challenge or dialyzed venom skin test. Conclusions: The management of patients with a convincing history of immediate insect allergy but negative conventional test results requires an adaption of the guidelines including an incorporation of the novel diagnostic tools. Although cellu- lar tests represent equivalent sensitivity and superior specificity as compared with standard ones, these tests still remain supplementary diagnostic tools. In a minority of cases (especially in the developing countries where cellular tests cannot be performed), venom immunotherapy in adult subjects could be taken into account based solemnly on the history of a clear patient's identification of the culprit insect.","PeriodicalId":22835,"journal":{"name":"The Open Allergy Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":"16-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Allergy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874838401003010016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To provide a comprehensive evaluation in patients with a convincing history of immediate insect allergy but negative skin test and/or specific IgE results, adequately addressing the question of how best to manage them. Results: Among 43 identified papers only 9 of them presented relevant original data, while the other papers were reviews. In the majority of the cases, the culprit insect was identified with in vitro tests such as Basophil Activation Test, Cellular Allergen Stimulation Test or Western blot, whereas in vivo (less frequently) with sting challenge or dialyzed venom skin test. Conclusions: The management of patients with a convincing history of immediate insect allergy but negative conventional test results requires an adaption of the guidelines including an incorporation of the novel diagnostic tools. Although cellu- lar tests represent equivalent sensitivity and superior specificity as compared with standard ones, these tests still remain supplementary diagnostic tools. In a minority of cases (especially in the developing countries where cellular tests cannot be performed), venom immunotherapy in adult subjects could be taken into account based solemnly on the history of a clear patient's identification of the culprit insect.
推测即刻膜翅目毒液过敏和无法检测到IgE的处理方法
目的:为有令人信服的即时昆虫过敏史但皮肤试验和/或特异性IgE结果阴性的患者提供全面评估,充分解决如何最好地管理他们的问题。结果:在43篇被识别的论文中,仅有9篇论文提供了相关的原始数据,其余均为综述。在大多数情况下,罪魁祸首昆虫是通过体外试验,如嗜碱性粒细胞激活试验、细胞过敏原刺激试验或Western blot来确定的,而在体内(较少)通过刺刺攻击或透析毒液皮肤试验来确定。结论:对有令人信服的直接昆虫过敏史但常规测试结果阴性的患者的管理需要对指南进行调整,包括纳入新的诊断工具。虽然细胞检测与标准检测相比具有同等的灵敏度和更高的特异性,但这些检测仍然是辅助诊断工具。在少数情况下(特别是在不能进行细胞试验的发展中国家),可以根据患者明确确定致病昆虫的历史,认真考虑对成人受试者进行毒液免疫治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信