De-Risking Fluid Compartmentalization of the Barik Reservoir in the Khazzan Field, Oman - An Integrated Approach

A. Al Anboori, S. Dee, Khalil Al Rashdi, H. Volk
{"title":"De-Risking Fluid Compartmentalization of the Barik Reservoir in the Khazzan Field, Oman - An Integrated Approach","authors":"A. Al Anboori, S. Dee, Khalil Al Rashdi, H. Volk","doi":"10.2118/207687-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The degree of fluid compartmentalization has direct implications on the development costs of oil and gas reservoirs, since it may negatively impact gas water contacts (GWC) and fluid condensate gas ratios (CGR). In this case study on the Barik Formation in the giant Khazzan gas field in Block 61 in Oman we demonstrate how integrating independent approaches for assessing potential reservoir compartmentalization can be used to assess compartmentalization risk. The three disciplines that were integrated are structural geology (fault seal analysis, movement and stress stages of faults and fractures, traps geometry over geological time), petroleum systems (fluid chemistry and pressure, charge history) and sedimentology-stratigraphy including diagenesis (sedimentological and diagenetic controls on vertical and lateral facies and reservoir quality variation). Dynamic data from production tests were also analyzed and integrated with the observations above.\n Based on this work, Combined Common Risk Segment (CCRS) maps with a most likely and alternative scenarios for reservoir compartmentalization were constructed. While pressure data carry significant uncertainty due to the tight nature of the deeply buried rocks, it is clear pressures in gas-bearing sections fall onto a single pressure gradient across Block 61, while water pressures indicate variable GWCs. Overall, the GWCs appear to shallow across the field towards the NW, while water pressure appears to increase in that direction. The \"apparent\" gas communication with separate aquifers is difficult to explain conventionally. A range of scenarios for fluid distribution and reservoir connectivity are discussed.\n Fault seal compartmentalization and different trap spill points were found to be the most likely mechanism explaining fluid distribution and likely reservoir compartmentalization. Perched water may be another factor explaining variable GWCs. Hydrodynamic tilting due to the flow of formation water was deemed an unlikely scenario, and the risk of reservoir compartmentalization due to sedimentological and diagenetic flow barriers was deemed to be low.","PeriodicalId":10959,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, November 17, 2021","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, November 17, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/207687-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The degree of fluid compartmentalization has direct implications on the development costs of oil and gas reservoirs, since it may negatively impact gas water contacts (GWC) and fluid condensate gas ratios (CGR). In this case study on the Barik Formation in the giant Khazzan gas field in Block 61 in Oman we demonstrate how integrating independent approaches for assessing potential reservoir compartmentalization can be used to assess compartmentalization risk. The three disciplines that were integrated are structural geology (fault seal analysis, movement and stress stages of faults and fractures, traps geometry over geological time), petroleum systems (fluid chemistry and pressure, charge history) and sedimentology-stratigraphy including diagenesis (sedimentological and diagenetic controls on vertical and lateral facies and reservoir quality variation). Dynamic data from production tests were also analyzed and integrated with the observations above. Based on this work, Combined Common Risk Segment (CCRS) maps with a most likely and alternative scenarios for reservoir compartmentalization were constructed. While pressure data carry significant uncertainty due to the tight nature of the deeply buried rocks, it is clear pressures in gas-bearing sections fall onto a single pressure gradient across Block 61, while water pressures indicate variable GWCs. Overall, the GWCs appear to shallow across the field towards the NW, while water pressure appears to increase in that direction. The "apparent" gas communication with separate aquifers is difficult to explain conventionally. A range of scenarios for fluid distribution and reservoir connectivity are discussed. Fault seal compartmentalization and different trap spill points were found to be the most likely mechanism explaining fluid distribution and likely reservoir compartmentalization. Perched water may be another factor explaining variable GWCs. Hydrodynamic tilting due to the flow of formation water was deemed an unlikely scenario, and the risk of reservoir compartmentalization due to sedimentological and diagenetic flow barriers was deemed to be low.
阿曼Khazzan油田Barik油藏流体分区风险降低的综合方法
流体分区化程度直接影响油气藏开发成本,因为它可能对气水界面(GWC)和凝析气比(CGR)产生负面影响。在阿曼61区块巨型Khazzan气田的Barik组的案例研究中,我们展示了如何使用综合的独立方法来评估潜在的储层分区,以评估分区风险。整合的三个学科是构造地质学(断层封闭分析、断层和裂缝的运动和应力阶段、圈闭几何随地质时间的变化)、石油系统(流体化学和压力、充注史)和沉积地层学(包括成岩作用)(沉积学和成岩作用对垂向和侧向相以及储层质量变化的控制)。还分析了生产试验的动态数据,并将其与上述观察结果相结合。在此基础上,构建了具有最可能和备选方案的油藏分区组合共同风险段(CCRS)图。虽然由于深埋岩石的致密性,压力数据具有很大的不确定性,但很明显,含气部分的压力在61区块上呈现单一压力梯度,而水压则显示可变的gwc。总体而言,gwc向西北方向偏浅,而水压则向西北方向增加。天然气与不同含水层的“表观”联系很难用常规方法解释。讨论了流体分布和储层连通性的一系列场景。断层封闭性和不同圈闭溢出点是解释流体分布和储层划分的最可能机制。栖息水域可能是解释gwc变化的另一个因素。地层水流动引起的流体动力倾斜被认为是不太可能发生的情况,沉积学和成岩流动障碍导致储层分区化的风险被认为很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信