{"title":"What the highest rated movie of all time may teach us about portraying suicide in film","authors":"M. Sinyor, S. Stack, T. Niederkrotenthaler","doi":"10.1177/0004867419891247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Media portrayals of suicide can have a substantial, negative influence on suicide rates often described as the Werther effect (Sinyor et al., 2018). One of the most extreme examples of this phenomenon was the publicity surrounding the death of Robin Williams which was associated with an increase of more than 1800 deaths in the United States in late 2014 (Fink et al., 2018). Recently, there has been renewed interest in the potential deleterious effects of fictional media depictions given an association between the release of the Netflix show 13 Reasons Why and increased youth suicides (Niederkrotenthaler et al., 2019). In our conversations with members of the entertainment media (and the mainstream media), a common theme is frustration with what they perceive as an emphasis by the suicide prevention community on what we discourage them from publishing. Given that their job is ultimately to create and disseminate content, we have received feedback that models for how to do so safely and appropriately may be just as important as a list of elements to avoid. Historically, the best evidence in this area has been from non-fictional, news media coverage. Specifically, news stories emphasizing resilience and the absence of suicide attempts/ deaths in the face of suicidal crises have been associated with reductions in suicide across a population, the so-called Papageno effect (Sinyor et al., 2018) (following publication of newspaper stories in which people experiencing suicidal crises did not engage in suicidal behaviour and went on to survive [socalled ‘mastery of crisis’ articles], there was a small, statistically significant reduction in suicides in Austria). While the issues involved in fictional and non-fictional depictions have some overlap, they are not identical, and, ideally, fictional archetypes would inform this discussion. Numerous films have explored the topic of suicide in different ways, but The Shawshank Redemption (1994), the number 1 film of all time according to users of the Internet Movie Database (IMDB; see IMDB.com Top 250), provides a rich basis for discussion of the potential impacts of suicide-related content in fictional movies based on what is currently known about media impacts on suicide. The Shawshank Redemption tells the story of a wrongly imprisoned man who eventually escapes to freedom. During its 142-minute running time, it includes four potential or actual suicide vignettes relating to its two protagonists (Andy and Red) and two supporting characters (Brooks and Norton). The film is not entirely consistent with responsible media recommendations, specifically in relation to the latter two characters who both die by suicide. A major theme of the film is the impact of institutionalization that comes with lengthy incarceration on the human spirit. Brooks is released after five decades in prison to a world that appears foreign and terrifying. He contemplates engaging in crime so that he can be sent back to the world he knows. He writes a letter to his friends: ‘I don’t like it here. I’m tired of being afraid all the time. I’ve decided not to stay’. In despair, he carves ‘Brooks was here’ into a wood ceiling beam and then hangs himself from it. Norton, the prison’s warden and the film’s main villain, is depicted shooting himself in the head rather than being arrested when Andy exposes his criminal activities. Both scenes are potentially problematic with each depicting a lethal suicide method. Brooks is also a highly identifiable character and identification appears to mediate much of the risk of suicide contagion (Till et al., 2015). Identification with the Norton character may be less likely and news media portrayals of suicide in villains are often associated with a reduction in subsequent suicides (Sinyor et al., 2018). However, being accused of a crime is a risk factor for suicide and about half of suicides in jail populations occur while defendants are What the highest rated movie of all time may teach us about portraying suicide in film","PeriodicalId":8576,"journal":{"name":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867419891247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Media portrayals of suicide can have a substantial, negative influence on suicide rates often described as the Werther effect (Sinyor et al., 2018). One of the most extreme examples of this phenomenon was the publicity surrounding the death of Robin Williams which was associated with an increase of more than 1800 deaths in the United States in late 2014 (Fink et al., 2018). Recently, there has been renewed interest in the potential deleterious effects of fictional media depictions given an association between the release of the Netflix show 13 Reasons Why and increased youth suicides (Niederkrotenthaler et al., 2019). In our conversations with members of the entertainment media (and the mainstream media), a common theme is frustration with what they perceive as an emphasis by the suicide prevention community on what we discourage them from publishing. Given that their job is ultimately to create and disseminate content, we have received feedback that models for how to do so safely and appropriately may be just as important as a list of elements to avoid. Historically, the best evidence in this area has been from non-fictional, news media coverage. Specifically, news stories emphasizing resilience and the absence of suicide attempts/ deaths in the face of suicidal crises have been associated with reductions in suicide across a population, the so-called Papageno effect (Sinyor et al., 2018) (following publication of newspaper stories in which people experiencing suicidal crises did not engage in suicidal behaviour and went on to survive [socalled ‘mastery of crisis’ articles], there was a small, statistically significant reduction in suicides in Austria). While the issues involved in fictional and non-fictional depictions have some overlap, they are not identical, and, ideally, fictional archetypes would inform this discussion. Numerous films have explored the topic of suicide in different ways, but The Shawshank Redemption (1994), the number 1 film of all time according to users of the Internet Movie Database (IMDB; see IMDB.com Top 250), provides a rich basis for discussion of the potential impacts of suicide-related content in fictional movies based on what is currently known about media impacts on suicide. The Shawshank Redemption tells the story of a wrongly imprisoned man who eventually escapes to freedom. During its 142-minute running time, it includes four potential or actual suicide vignettes relating to its two protagonists (Andy and Red) and two supporting characters (Brooks and Norton). The film is not entirely consistent with responsible media recommendations, specifically in relation to the latter two characters who both die by suicide. A major theme of the film is the impact of institutionalization that comes with lengthy incarceration on the human spirit. Brooks is released after five decades in prison to a world that appears foreign and terrifying. He contemplates engaging in crime so that he can be sent back to the world he knows. He writes a letter to his friends: ‘I don’t like it here. I’m tired of being afraid all the time. I’ve decided not to stay’. In despair, he carves ‘Brooks was here’ into a wood ceiling beam and then hangs himself from it. Norton, the prison’s warden and the film’s main villain, is depicted shooting himself in the head rather than being arrested when Andy exposes his criminal activities. Both scenes are potentially problematic with each depicting a lethal suicide method. Brooks is also a highly identifiable character and identification appears to mediate much of the risk of suicide contagion (Till et al., 2015). Identification with the Norton character may be less likely and news media portrayals of suicide in villains are often associated with a reduction in subsequent suicides (Sinyor et al., 2018). However, being accused of a crime is a risk factor for suicide and about half of suicides in jail populations occur while defendants are What the highest rated movie of all time may teach us about portraying suicide in film
媒体对自杀的描述会对自杀率产生实质性的负面影响,通常被称为维特效应(Sinyor et al., 2018)。这种现象最极端的例子之一是围绕罗宾·威廉姆斯死亡的宣传,这与2014年底美国死亡人数增加1800多人有关(Fink等人,2018)。最近,人们对虚构媒体描述的潜在有害影响重新产生了兴趣,因为Netflix节目《13个原因》的发布与青少年自杀率上升之间存在关联(Niederkrotenthaler等人,2019)。在我们与娱乐媒体(和主流媒体)成员的对话中,一个共同的主题是,他们认为自杀预防社区强调我们不鼓励他们发表的内容,这让他们感到沮丧。考虑到他们的工作最终是创建和传播内容,我们收到的反馈是,如何安全和适当地做到这一点的模型可能与要避免的元素列表一样重要。从历史上看,这一领域的最佳证据来自非虚构的新闻媒体报道。具体来说,在面对自杀危机时,强调韧性和没有自杀企图/死亡的新闻报道与整个人群自杀率的降低有关,即所谓的帕帕杰诺效应(Sinyor等人,2018)(在经历自杀危机的人没有从事自杀行为并继续生存的新闻报道发表后[所谓的“危机掌握”文章],有一个小的,统计数据显示,奥地利的自杀率显著下降)。虽然虚构和非虚构描述中涉及的问题有一些重叠,但它们并不相同,理想情况下,虚构的原型将为这种讨论提供信息。许多电影都以不同的方式探讨了自杀的话题,但《肖申克的救赎》(1994),根据互联网电影数据库(IMDB;(见IMDB.com Top 250),根据目前已知的媒体对自杀的影响,为讨论虚构电影中与自杀相关的内容的潜在影响提供了丰富的基础。《肖申克的救赎》讲述了一个被错误囚禁的人最终逃脱自由的故事。在142分钟的播放时间里,它包括四个潜在的或实际的自杀小插曲,与它的两个主角(安迪和瑞德)和两个配角(布鲁克斯和诺顿)有关。这部电影并不完全符合负责任的媒体的建议,特别是关于后两个角色都自杀身亡。影片的一个主要主题是长期监禁对人类精神的影响。在监狱服刑五十年后,布鲁克斯被释放到一个陌生而可怕的世界。他考虑从事犯罪,这样他就可以被送回他熟悉的世界。他给朋友们写了一封信:“我不喜欢这里。我厌倦了一直担惊受怕。我决定不留下了。”绝望之下,他在天花板的木梁上刻上“布鲁克斯在这里”,然后吊在上面自尽。诺顿是监狱的监狱长,也是电影的主要反派,在安迪揭露他的犯罪活动时,他没有被逮捕,而是开枪自杀了。这两个场景都有潜在的问题,每个场景都描绘了致命的自杀方法。布鲁克斯也是一个高度可识别的角色,而这种身份似乎在很大程度上调解了自杀传染的风险(Till et al., 2015)。与诺顿角色的认同可能不太可能,新闻媒体对恶棍自杀的描述通常与随后自杀的减少有关(Sinyor等人,2018)。然而,被指控犯罪是自杀的一个危险因素,大约一半的监狱里的自杀发生在被告被判有罪的时候。这部有史以来收视率最高的电影可能会教给我们在电影中刻画自杀