Young Sin Kim, Jeonga Kim, Y. Jeong, Y. H. Choi, E. Cho, H. Chung, S. Sa, S. Beak, J. Hong
{"title":"Growth, Body shape and Carcass cutting yield traits of Duroc and Crossbred(Duroc×Pietrain×Pietrain)pigs","authors":"Young Sin Kim, Jeonga Kim, Y. Jeong, Y. H. Choi, E. Cho, H. Chung, S. Sa, S. Beak, J. Hong","doi":"10.5762/KAIS.2020.21.7.255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was undertaken to evaluate the growth, body shape and carcass cutting yield traits of Duroc (D) and crossbred (Duroc×Pietrain×Pietrain; DPP) pigs. A total of 147 D and 101 DPP pigs were used for analyzing the growth trait, whereas 16 D and 16 DPP pigs were evaluated for carcass yields. Backfat thickness (BF) and average daily feed intake (ADFI) were significantly higher in D (14.07±0.24 mm, 2,101 g) than in DPP (12.69±3.25 mm, 1,909 g) (p <0.001). Moreover, D exhibited significantly higher body shape traits including body height (BH), chest depth (CD) and chest width (CW), as compared to DPP pigs (p <0.001). No differences were observed for body length (BL) between the two strains. Analysis of the carcass cutting yield traits determined for D and DPP were in the order: ham (HM; 31.17% and 33.43%), belly (BY; 23.40% and 19.55%), and picnic shoulder (PS; 16.54% and 16.87%), respectively. Then, HM showed a difference of 2.26% P with D(31.17%) and DPP(33.43%), while BY showed a difference of 3.85% P with D(23.40%) and DPP(19.55%). Taken together, our results indicate that DPP has a better feed efficiency than D, and therefore has the potential to increase the production of low-fat pork, targeting consumers having a high preference who have opted for a healthy lifestyle. These results can be used as basic data for developing an ideal pig breed.","PeriodicalId":23087,"journal":{"name":"The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society","volume":"31 1","pages":"255-261"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2020.21.7.255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study was undertaken to evaluate the growth, body shape and carcass cutting yield traits of Duroc (D) and crossbred (Duroc×Pietrain×Pietrain; DPP) pigs. A total of 147 D and 101 DPP pigs were used for analyzing the growth trait, whereas 16 D and 16 DPP pigs were evaluated for carcass yields. Backfat thickness (BF) and average daily feed intake (ADFI) were significantly higher in D (14.07±0.24 mm, 2,101 g) than in DPP (12.69±3.25 mm, 1,909 g) (p <0.001). Moreover, D exhibited significantly higher body shape traits including body height (BH), chest depth (CD) and chest width (CW), as compared to DPP pigs (p <0.001). No differences were observed for body length (BL) between the two strains. Analysis of the carcass cutting yield traits determined for D and DPP were in the order: ham (HM; 31.17% and 33.43%), belly (BY; 23.40% and 19.55%), and picnic shoulder (PS; 16.54% and 16.87%), respectively. Then, HM showed a difference of 2.26% P with D(31.17%) and DPP(33.43%), while BY showed a difference of 3.85% P with D(23.40%) and DPP(19.55%). Taken together, our results indicate that DPP has a better feed efficiency than D, and therefore has the potential to increase the production of low-fat pork, targeting consumers having a high preference who have opted for a healthy lifestyle. These results can be used as basic data for developing an ideal pig breed.
本试验旨在评价杜洛克(D)和杂交(Duroc×Pietrain×Pietrain;选用147头D猪和101头DPP猪进行生长性状分析,16头D猪和16头DPP猪进行胴体产量评价。D组背膘厚(14.07±0.24 mm, 2,101 g)和平均日采食量(ADFI)显著高于DPP组(12.69±3.25 mm, 1,909 g) (p <0.001)。此外,D组猪的体高、胸深和胸宽均显著高于DPP组(p <0.001)。两菌株体长(BL)无显著差异。胴体切割产量性状分析确定D和DPP的顺序为:火腿(HM);31.17%和33.43%),腹部(BY;23.40%和19.55%),野餐肩(PS;分别为16.54%和16.87%)。HM与D(31.17%)和DPP(33.43%)的差异为2.26%,BY与D(23.40%)和DPP(19.55%)的差异为3.85%。综上所述,我们的研究结果表明,DPP比D具有更好的饲料效率,因此有可能增加低脂猪肉的产量,目标是选择健康生活方式的高偏好消费者。这些结果可作为培育理想猪种的基础数据。