How contact is related to awareness of discrimination against women of color

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
J. Jordan, Nazita Lajevardi, J. Waller
{"title":"How contact is related to awareness of discrimination against women of color","authors":"J. Jordan, Nazita Lajevardi, J. Waller","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2022.2086472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Women of color report high levels of discrimination in politics, healthcare, and the labor market. Numerous studies have found contact to be a powerful means of lessening prejudice. But a growing consensus argues that broad generalizations about the efficacy of intergroup interaction are untenable and that we need to study separately the effects of different varieties of contact between different racial, social, political, and gender groups. To date, studies have not explored how contact affects the ability of different groups of Americans—whites, people of color, Democrats and Republicans—to empathize with and take the perspective of women of color. The present study fills this gap and examines whether more diverse personal contacts with women of color are linked to how Americans grasp the discrimination that they face. It pools several large, original surveys of Americans and measures whether different levels of contact correlate with awareness of discrimination against women of color. We find that there is indeed a positive association. Consistent with several studies, we present evidence of a strong ceiling effect: people of color and Democrats were less affected by knowing additional women of color, likely because they tend to start from a higher level of empathetic awareness.","PeriodicalId":46590,"journal":{"name":"Politics Groups and Identities","volume":"1 1","pages":"1120 - 1137"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics Groups and Identities","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2022.2086472","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Women of color report high levels of discrimination in politics, healthcare, and the labor market. Numerous studies have found contact to be a powerful means of lessening prejudice. But a growing consensus argues that broad generalizations about the efficacy of intergroup interaction are untenable and that we need to study separately the effects of different varieties of contact between different racial, social, political, and gender groups. To date, studies have not explored how contact affects the ability of different groups of Americans—whites, people of color, Democrats and Republicans—to empathize with and take the perspective of women of color. The present study fills this gap and examines whether more diverse personal contacts with women of color are linked to how Americans grasp the discrimination that they face. It pools several large, original surveys of Americans and measures whether different levels of contact correlate with awareness of discrimination against women of color. We find that there is indeed a positive association. Consistent with several studies, we present evidence of a strong ceiling effect: people of color and Democrats were less affected by knowing additional women of color, likely because they tend to start from a higher level of empathetic awareness.
接触与对有色人种女性歧视的意识有何关系
有色人种女性在政治、医疗和劳动力市场受到高度歧视。许多研究发现,接触是减少偏见的有力手段。但越来越多的人一致认为,对群体间互动效果的笼统概括是站不住脚的,我们需要分别研究不同种族、社会、政治和性别群体之间不同类型接触的影响。迄今为止,还没有研究探讨接触如何影响不同群体的美国人——白人、有色人种、民主党人和共和党人——同情有色人种女性并采取有色人种观点的能力。目前的研究填补了这一空白,并调查了与有色人种女性更多样化的个人接触是否与美国人如何理解她们所面临的歧视有关。它汇集了几项针对美国人的大型原始调查,并衡量不同程度的接触是否与对有色人种女性歧视的认识有关。我们发现确实存在正相关。与几项研究一致,我们提出了一个强大的天花板效应的证据:有色人种和民主党人在认识更多有色人种女性时受到的影响较小,这可能是因为他们往往从更高的同理心意识开始。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Politics Groups and Identities
Politics Groups and Identities POLITICAL SCIENCE-
自引率
5.60%
发文量
50
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信