Effect of forcing vine regrowth on 'Tempranillo' (Vitis vinifera L.) berry development and quality in Extremadura

N. Lavado, David Uriarte Hernández, L. Mancha, D. Moreno, M. Sánchez, M. H. P. Losada
{"title":"Effect of forcing vine regrowth on 'Tempranillo' (Vitis vinifera L.) berry development and quality in Extremadura","authors":"N. Lavado, David Uriarte Hernández, L. Mancha, D. Moreno, M. Sánchez, M. H. P. Losada","doi":"10.5073/VITIS.2019.58.SPECIAL-ISSUE.135-142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In warmer regions, fruit ripening in the wine grape tends to take place during the hottest part of the growing season. This can have negative consequences on the qualitative characteristics of the grape berries at harvest. Forcing vines to regrow can be an aggressive but effective technique to delay the harvest date, but needs to be evaluated carefully in each growing condition. In 2017, in an experimental vineyard in Extremadura, forcing was conducted 3 (F1 treatment) and 22 (F2 treatment) days after anthesis (May 18 and June 6) by hedging growing shoots to seven nodes and removing summer laterals, leaves and primary clusters. Vines grown using conventional practices were used for the Control treatment. Forcing delayed the harvest date from August 22 (Control) to September 14 (F1) and October 19 (F2). Shifting the berry growth period modified the duration of the different fruit development stages. Compared to the Control treatment, the F1 and F2 berries were smaller at harvest, but had similar skin weight percentages; however, the seed weight percentage of the F2 berries was higher. The differences in grape composition observed at harvest between the various treatments were further accentuated in the wines. At harvest, the F2 berries had significantly higher total polyphenol and anthocyanin content than the Control and F1 berries, which had similar values. In the wines, both F1 and F2 characteristics differed considerably from the Control, most notably in the high F2 tannin concentration. These preliminary results from the first year of study indicate the potential of this technique to obtain wine grapes with very different characteristics, offering new viticultural perspectives in warm climate areas.","PeriodicalId":23613,"journal":{"name":"Vitis: Journal of Grapevine Research","volume":"9 1","pages":"135-142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vitis: Journal of Grapevine Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5073/VITIS.2019.58.SPECIAL-ISSUE.135-142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

In warmer regions, fruit ripening in the wine grape tends to take place during the hottest part of the growing season. This can have negative consequences on the qualitative characteristics of the grape berries at harvest. Forcing vines to regrow can be an aggressive but effective technique to delay the harvest date, but needs to be evaluated carefully in each growing condition. In 2017, in an experimental vineyard in Extremadura, forcing was conducted 3 (F1 treatment) and 22 (F2 treatment) days after anthesis (May 18 and June 6) by hedging growing shoots to seven nodes and removing summer laterals, leaves and primary clusters. Vines grown using conventional practices were used for the Control treatment. Forcing delayed the harvest date from August 22 (Control) to September 14 (F1) and October 19 (F2). Shifting the berry growth period modified the duration of the different fruit development stages. Compared to the Control treatment, the F1 and F2 berries were smaller at harvest, but had similar skin weight percentages; however, the seed weight percentage of the F2 berries was higher. The differences in grape composition observed at harvest between the various treatments were further accentuated in the wines. At harvest, the F2 berries had significantly higher total polyphenol and anthocyanin content than the Control and F1 berries, which had similar values. In the wines, both F1 and F2 characteristics differed considerably from the Control, most notably in the high F2 tannin concentration. These preliminary results from the first year of study indicate the potential of this technique to obtain wine grapes with very different characteristics, offering new viticultural perspectives in warm climate areas.
强迫植株再生对埃斯特雷马杜拉‘丹魄’果实发育和品质的影响
在温暖的地区,酿酒葡萄的果实成熟往往发生在生长季节最热的部分。这可能会对收获时葡萄果实的质量特性产生负面影响。强迫葡萄藤再生可能是一种积极但有效的延迟收获日期的技术,但需要在每种生长条件下仔细评估。2017年,在埃斯特雷马杜拉(Extremadura)的一个实验葡萄园,在花后3天(F1处理)和22天(F2处理)(5月18日和6月6日),通过树篱将嫩芽生长到7个节点,去除夏季侧枝、叶片和主簇。采用常规方法种植的葡萄藤作为对照处理。强制将收获日期从8月22日(对照)推迟到9月14日(F1)和10月19日(F2)。改变浆果的生育期可以改变不同果实发育阶段的持续时间。与对照处理相比,F1和F2果实收获时体积较小,但果皮质量百分比相近;但F2果实的种子重率较高。在收获时观察到的不同处理之间的葡萄成分差异在葡萄酒中进一步突出。收获时,F2果实的总多酚和花青素含量显著高于对照和F1果实,两者含量相近。在葡萄酒中,F1和F2的特征与对照有很大的不同,最明显的是F2的高单宁浓度。这些第一年的初步研究结果表明,这种技术有潜力获得具有非常不同特征的酿酒葡萄,为温暖气候地区的葡萄栽培提供了新的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信