Addressing climate goals and the SDGs through a just energy transition? Empirical evidence from Germany and South Africa

IF 2.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
R. Hägele, G. Iacobuţă, J. Tops
{"title":"Addressing climate goals and the SDGs through a just energy transition? Empirical evidence from Germany and South Africa","authors":"R. Hägele, G. Iacobuţă, J. Tops","doi":"10.1080/1943815X.2022.2108459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In striving to achieve the Paris Agreement and the 2030 Agenda, governments have the opportunity to implement their climate and sustainability goals more coherently. Such coherence requires the coordination of interdependent policies across different policy fields, sectors and actors. This paper explores how governments design and implement synergic solutions to concomitantly achieve both international agendas. With the empirical cases of Germany and South Africa, we investigate two independent approaches to the synergic solution of a just energy transition, whereby countries aim to phase out coal as a means to tackle climate change while also ensuring that the achievement of other Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is not hindered. Methodologically, we apply a deductive qualitative approach consisting of literature review, semi-structured interviews, and content analysis. To that end, we examine relevant policies and institutional arrangements by applying a combined conceptual framework of energy justice and just transition in both countries. We find major challenges in overcoming environmental, economic and social burdens of the coal phase-out, especially related to jobs and inequality (SDGs 8, 10) and the Water-Energy-Food-Land nexus (SDGs 2, 6, 7, 15). Through the selection of Germany and South Africa, we illustrate how countries with different political, social and economic backgrounds strive to manage such a transition. Our developed framework and case-studies’ findings point towards important considerations when designing just energy transition pathways, such as ensuring inclusiveness in decision-making, thoroughly assessing social, economic and environmental impacts, and adequately coordinating across different actors and the local, provincial and national levels.","PeriodicalId":16194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"85 - 120"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2022.2108459","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT In striving to achieve the Paris Agreement and the 2030 Agenda, governments have the opportunity to implement their climate and sustainability goals more coherently. Such coherence requires the coordination of interdependent policies across different policy fields, sectors and actors. This paper explores how governments design and implement synergic solutions to concomitantly achieve both international agendas. With the empirical cases of Germany and South Africa, we investigate two independent approaches to the synergic solution of a just energy transition, whereby countries aim to phase out coal as a means to tackle climate change while also ensuring that the achievement of other Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is not hindered. Methodologically, we apply a deductive qualitative approach consisting of literature review, semi-structured interviews, and content analysis. To that end, we examine relevant policies and institutional arrangements by applying a combined conceptual framework of energy justice and just transition in both countries. We find major challenges in overcoming environmental, economic and social burdens of the coal phase-out, especially related to jobs and inequality (SDGs 8, 10) and the Water-Energy-Food-Land nexus (SDGs 2, 6, 7, 15). Through the selection of Germany and South Africa, we illustrate how countries with different political, social and economic backgrounds strive to manage such a transition. Our developed framework and case-studies’ findings point towards important considerations when designing just energy transition pathways, such as ensuring inclusiveness in decision-making, thoroughly assessing social, economic and environmental impacts, and adequately coordinating across different actors and the local, provincial and national levels.
通过公正的能源转型实现气候目标和可持续发展目标?来自德国和南非的经验证据
在努力实现《巴黎协定》和《2030年可持续发展议程》的过程中,各国政府有机会更加协调一致地实施其气候和可持续发展目标。这种一致性要求在不同政策领域、部门和行动者之间协调相互依存的政策。本文探讨了政府如何设计和实施协同解决方案,以同时实现这两个国际议程。通过德国和南非的经验案例,我们研究了两种独立的方法来实现能源转型的协同解决方案,即各国旨在逐步淘汰煤炭作为应对气候变化的手段,同时确保其他可持续发展目标(sdg)的实现不受阻碍。在方法上,我们采用演绎定性方法,包括文献综述、半结构化访谈和内容分析。为此,我们通过应用两国能源正义和公正过渡的综合概念框架来研究相关政策和制度安排。我们发现,在克服煤炭淘汰带来的环境、经济和社会负担方面存在重大挑战,特别是与就业和不平等(可持续发展目标8、10)以及水-能源-粮食-土地关系(可持续发展目标2、6、7、15)有关。通过选择德国和南非,我们说明具有不同政治、社会和经济背景的国家如何努力管理这种过渡。我们开发的框架和案例研究的结果指出了在设计能源转型路径时需要考虑的重要因素,例如确保决策的包容性,全面评估社会、经济和环境影响,以及在不同参与者和地方、省和国家层面进行充分协调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences (JIES) provides a stimulating, informative and critical forum for intellectual debate on significant environmental issues. It brings together perspectives from a wide range of disciplines and methodologies in both the social and natural sciences in an effort to develop integrative knowledge about the processes responsible for environmental change. The Journal is especially concerned with the relationships between science, society and policy and one of its key aims is to advance understanding of the theory and practice of sustainable development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信