Effect of two cleansing materials on hardness and surface roughness of conventional and three-dimensional printed denture base materials

Gehan el-olimy, A. Salem
{"title":"Effect of two cleansing materials on hardness and surface roughness of conventional and three-dimensional printed denture base materials","authors":"Gehan el-olimy, A. Salem","doi":"10.4103/tdj.tdj_17_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim The aim of this study was to compare the effects of two different cleansing materials on the hardness and surface roughness of conventional and three-dimensional (3D) printed denture base materials. Materials and methods A total of 140 specimens were tested for surface hardness and surface roughness. The samples of each denture base type (n = 70) were randomly divided into seven subgroups each of them = 10 samples. The first subgroup was stored in distilled water. Second, third, and fourth subgroups were immersed for 18, 36, and 54 days in Corega denture cleanser, respectively. Fifth, sixth, and seventh subgroups were immersed for 18, 36, and 54 days in Aloe vera, respectively. Results The roughness of the 3D printed denture base material was significantly lower than that of the conventional denture base material. While the hardness of the 3D printed denture base material was significantly higher than that of the conventional denture base material. For the two types of cleaning agents used, there was a nonsignificant difference in hardness of 3D printed and conventional denture base materials immersed in Corega or Aloe vera. There was a significant difference in the surface roughness of 3D printed and conventional denture base materials immersed in Corega and Aloe vera. Conclusion Within the limitations of this in vitro study, it was concluded that 3D printed denture base material exhibited significantly more favorable surface roughness and hardness compared to the conventional denture base material. Disinfection by immersion using Corega produced higher surface roughness values than using Aloe vera. While Corega and Aloe vera caused nonsignificant damage to the hardness of the conventional and 3D printed denture base materials. Clinical implications Aloe vera gel for disinfecting 3D printed and conventional denture base materials is suggested to maintain a smooth surface of the denture base. Printing denture bases is recommended because of its high hardness and low roughness could be achieved.","PeriodicalId":22324,"journal":{"name":"Tanta Dental Journal","volume":"16 1","pages":"125 - 131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tanta Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tdj.tdj_17_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim The aim of this study was to compare the effects of two different cleansing materials on the hardness and surface roughness of conventional and three-dimensional (3D) printed denture base materials. Materials and methods A total of 140 specimens were tested for surface hardness and surface roughness. The samples of each denture base type (n = 70) were randomly divided into seven subgroups each of them = 10 samples. The first subgroup was stored in distilled water. Second, third, and fourth subgroups were immersed for 18, 36, and 54 days in Corega denture cleanser, respectively. Fifth, sixth, and seventh subgroups were immersed for 18, 36, and 54 days in Aloe vera, respectively. Results The roughness of the 3D printed denture base material was significantly lower than that of the conventional denture base material. While the hardness of the 3D printed denture base material was significantly higher than that of the conventional denture base material. For the two types of cleaning agents used, there was a nonsignificant difference in hardness of 3D printed and conventional denture base materials immersed in Corega or Aloe vera. There was a significant difference in the surface roughness of 3D printed and conventional denture base materials immersed in Corega and Aloe vera. Conclusion Within the limitations of this in vitro study, it was concluded that 3D printed denture base material exhibited significantly more favorable surface roughness and hardness compared to the conventional denture base material. Disinfection by immersion using Corega produced higher surface roughness values than using Aloe vera. While Corega and Aloe vera caused nonsignificant damage to the hardness of the conventional and 3D printed denture base materials. Clinical implications Aloe vera gel for disinfecting 3D printed and conventional denture base materials is suggested to maintain a smooth surface of the denture base. Printing denture bases is recommended because of its high hardness and low roughness could be achieved.
两种清洁材料对常规和三维打印义齿基托材料硬度和表面粗糙度的影响
目的比较两种不同的清洁材料对常规和3D打印义齿基托材料的硬度和表面粗糙度的影响。材料和方法共测试了140个试样的表面硬度和表面粗糙度。每种义齿基托类型样本70例,随机分为7个亚组,每个亚组10例。第一组被储存在蒸馏水中。第二、第三、第四亚组分别浸泡在Corega义齿清洁剂中18、36、54 d。第5、6、7亚组分别浸泡在芦荟中18、36、54 d。结果3D打印义齿基托材料的粗糙度明显低于传统义齿基托材料。3D打印的义齿基托材料硬度明显高于传统义齿基托材料。对于使用的两种清洗剂,3D打印的义齿基托材料在Corega或芦荟浸泡后的硬度与传统义齿基托材料的硬度无显著差异。3D打印的义齿基托材料表面粗糙度与传统义齿基托材料表面粗糙度存在显著差异。结论在体外实验的限制下,3D打印义齿基托材料的表面粗糙度和硬度明显优于传统义齿基托材料。用Corega浸泡消毒比用芦荟消毒产生更高的表面粗糙度值。而Corega和芦荟对常规和3D打印义齿基托材料的硬度没有明显的损害。建议芦荟凝胶用于3D打印和传统义齿基托材料的消毒,以保持义齿基托表面光滑。由于其硬度高,粗糙度低,因此推荐打印义齿基托。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信