The Interpretation and Screening of Learning Difficulties in Mathematics: Regard at the Contribution of the Anthropo-Didactic Approach

Q2 Social Sciences
Thomas Rajotte, Marie-Paule Germain, S. Beaupré, Raphaelle Dufour
{"title":"The Interpretation and Screening of Learning Difficulties in Mathematics: Regard at the Contribution of the Anthropo-Didactic Approach","authors":"Thomas Rajotte, Marie-Paule Germain, S. Beaupré, Raphaelle Dufour","doi":"10.11648/J.IJEEDU.20211003.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to increase knowledge about learning difficulties in mathematics by exploring how different explanatory perspectives on learning difficulties influence the discourse of educational specialists when they take a position on the foundations of learning difficulties in the field of mathematics. A literature review of the learning difficulties in mathematics researches of the last thirty years shows the emergence of two major interpretative perspectives. In the first one, the difficulties are interpreted in terms of the learners’ cognitive characteristics, while the second perspective study learning difficulties as the result of interactions between the student and the school system. Many debates during the last few decades between the proponents of the first perspective and those of the second perspective brought out a third perspective: the anthropo-didactic approach. This research aims to test the relevance of this third perspective by analyzing the discourse of different education professionals. Since this third interpretive perspective of learning disabilities has recently appeared in the scientific literature, to our knowledge, no research to validate this perspective has been done in Canada. Through semi-structured interviews, 14 educational specialists shared their experience and their vision regarding the interpretation of learning difficulties in mathematics. Moreover, they discussed the different methods for screening those difficulties. The results obtained through analysis of their discourse highlight different themes connected to three explanatory perspectives (cognitivist, didactic and social science). In addition, the results reveal the complementary contribution of the anthropo-didactic approach (related to the social science perspective) which, owing to its recent emergence in the Quebec scholarly research, is rarely considered by researchers and professionals working in the field of education.","PeriodicalId":39088,"journal":{"name":"International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education","volume":"165 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.IJEEDU.20211003.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study is to increase knowledge about learning difficulties in mathematics by exploring how different explanatory perspectives on learning difficulties influence the discourse of educational specialists when they take a position on the foundations of learning difficulties in the field of mathematics. A literature review of the learning difficulties in mathematics researches of the last thirty years shows the emergence of two major interpretative perspectives. In the first one, the difficulties are interpreted in terms of the learners’ cognitive characteristics, while the second perspective study learning difficulties as the result of interactions between the student and the school system. Many debates during the last few decades between the proponents of the first perspective and those of the second perspective brought out a third perspective: the anthropo-didactic approach. This research aims to test the relevance of this third perspective by analyzing the discourse of different education professionals. Since this third interpretive perspective of learning disabilities has recently appeared in the scientific literature, to our knowledge, no research to validate this perspective has been done in Canada. Through semi-structured interviews, 14 educational specialists shared their experience and their vision regarding the interpretation of learning difficulties in mathematics. Moreover, they discussed the different methods for screening those difficulties. The results obtained through analysis of their discourse highlight different themes connected to three explanatory perspectives (cognitivist, didactic and social science). In addition, the results reveal the complementary contribution of the anthropo-didactic approach (related to the social science perspective) which, owing to its recent emergence in the Quebec scholarly research, is rarely considered by researchers and professionals working in the field of education.
数学学习困难的解释和筛选:关于人类教学方法的贡献
本研究的目的是通过探索不同的学习困难解释视角如何影响教育专家在数学领域学习困难的基础上的话语,来增加对数学学习困难的认识。对近三十年来数学学习困难研究的文献回顾表明,出现了两种主要的解释观点。第一种视角从学习者的认知特征来解释学习困难,而第二种视角则将学习困难视为学生与学校系统相互作用的结果。在过去的几十年里,第一种观点的支持者和第二种观点的支持者之间进行了许多辩论,产生了第三种观点:人类说教方法。本研究旨在通过分析不同教育专业人士的话语来检验这第三种视角的相关性。由于学习障碍的第三种解释观点最近出现在科学文献中,据我们所知,在加拿大还没有进行过验证这一观点的研究。通过半结构化访谈,14位教育专家分享了他们对数学学习困难解释的经验和看法。此外,他们还讨论了筛选这些困难的不同方法。通过对他们话语的分析得出的结果突出了与三种解释视角(认知主义、教学主义和社会科学)相关的不同主题。此外,研究结果揭示了人类教学方法(与社会科学观点有关)的补充贡献,由于它最近出现在魁北克的学术研究中,很少被教育领域的研究人员和专业人员考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: As an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-reviewed, open-access journal, IEJEE provides a platform for the publication of scientific research in the all areas of education on elementary grades. IEJEE is a multidisciplinary journal, committed to no single approach, discipline, methodology or paradigm. It is concerned with elementary education in general and devoted to all concerned with elementary education. IEJEE welcomes original empirical investigations. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. The major criteria in the review and the selection process concern the significance of the contribution to the area of elementary education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信