Examination of nutritional knowledge levels of physical education and sports stakeholders in gender variable: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Şakir Tüfekçi, H. Böke, O. Altungül
{"title":"Examination of nutritional knowledge levels of physical education and sports stakeholders in gender variable: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Şakir Tüfekçi, H. Böke, O. Altungül","doi":"10.15561/20755279.2021.0506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Study Aim. Nutrition knowledge is related to dietary behavior in athletes. Therefore, it may also have an impact on performance. Athletes with better nutrition knowledge have more healthy dietary habits. This meta-analysis study focused on the impact of gender on the nutrition knowledge levels of physical education and sports stakeholders. \nMaterial and Methods. This study adopted a meta-analysis research design, which is used to analyze, synthesize, and interpret quantitative findings from an array of studies through advanced statistical techniques. A meta-analysis involves combining the findings of studies carried out in different places and at different times on the same topic and obtaining a quantitatively accurate result based on a large sample. This study employed the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA, v. 2.0) to determine effect sizes and the variance of each study and to compare groups. Cohen’s kappa intercoder reliability and outlier tests were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). \nResults. We focused on 31 studies with a total sample size of 4575. We calculated the effect size of each study. We found a statistically significant effect size in favor of female stakeholders (d = 0.15; 95% CI -0.22 -0.09) in the fixed effects model, which was a weak result according to Cohen’s classification. We determined a statistically significant effect size in favor of female stakeholders (d = 0.15; 95% CI -0.29-0.01) in the random-effects model. These results suggest a slight difference in nutrition knowledge levels between male and female physical education and sports stakeholders. This result can pave the way for further research. \nConclusions. It is understood from the physical education and sports stakeholders that there is a weak difference in the nutritional knowledge levels of women compared to men. It is thought that people who study on sports nutrition and nutrition programs will benefit from the present finding. In addition, it is estimated that the researches to be carried out on the relevant subject will take the current study as a reference.","PeriodicalId":51897,"journal":{"name":"Physical Education of Students","volume":"120 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Education of Students","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2021.0506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Study Aim. Nutrition knowledge is related to dietary behavior in athletes. Therefore, it may also have an impact on performance. Athletes with better nutrition knowledge have more healthy dietary habits. This meta-analysis study focused on the impact of gender on the nutrition knowledge levels of physical education and sports stakeholders. Material and Methods. This study adopted a meta-analysis research design, which is used to analyze, synthesize, and interpret quantitative findings from an array of studies through advanced statistical techniques. A meta-analysis involves combining the findings of studies carried out in different places and at different times on the same topic and obtaining a quantitatively accurate result based on a large sample. This study employed the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA, v. 2.0) to determine effect sizes and the variance of each study and to compare groups. Cohen’s kappa intercoder reliability and outlier tests were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). Results. We focused on 31 studies with a total sample size of 4575. We calculated the effect size of each study. We found a statistically significant effect size in favor of female stakeholders (d = 0.15; 95% CI -0.22 -0.09) in the fixed effects model, which was a weak result according to Cohen’s classification. We determined a statistically significant effect size in favor of female stakeholders (d = 0.15; 95% CI -0.29-0.01) in the random-effects model. These results suggest a slight difference in nutrition knowledge levels between male and female physical education and sports stakeholders. This result can pave the way for further research. Conclusions. It is understood from the physical education and sports stakeholders that there is a weak difference in the nutritional knowledge levels of women compared to men. It is thought that people who study on sports nutrition and nutrition programs will benefit from the present finding. In addition, it is estimated that the researches to be carried out on the relevant subject will take the current study as a reference.
性别变量中体育教育和运动利益相关者营养知识水平的检验:系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景与研究目的。营养知识与运动员的饮食行为有关。因此,它也可能对性能产生影响。运动员的营养知识越丰富,饮食习惯越健康。本荟萃分析研究的重点是性别对体育教育和体育利益相关者营养知识水平的影响。材料和方法。本研究采用荟萃分析研究设计,通过先进的统计技术对一系列研究的定量结果进行分析、综合和解释。荟萃分析包括将在不同地点和不同时间对同一主题进行的研究结果结合起来,并基于大样本获得定量准确的结果。本研究采用综合meta分析(Comprehensive Meta-Analysis, CMA, v. 2.0)来确定每个研究的效应量和方差,并进行组间比较。Cohen’s kappa intercoder信度和离群值检验使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)进行。结果。我们集中了31项研究,总样本量为4575。我们计算了每项研究的效应量。我们发现统计学上显著的效应量有利于女性利益相关者(d = 0.15;固定效应模型中95% CI为-0.22 -0.09),根据Cohen的分类,这是一个弱结果。我们确定了有利于女性利益相关者的统计显著效应量(d = 0.15;95% CI -0.29-0.01)。这些结果表明,男性和女性体育教育和体育利益相关者在营养知识水平上略有差异。这一结果可以为进一步的研究铺平道路。结论。从体育教育和体育利益相关方了解到,与男性相比,女性的营养知识水平存在微弱差异。人们认为,研究运动营养和营养计划的人将从目前的发现中受益。此外,预计今后在相关课题上开展的研究将以当前的研究为参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physical Education of Students
Physical Education of Students EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信