{"title":"Preassembly Theory Invoking Prehistoric DNA Alterations","authors":"F. Menger, Syed A. A. Rizvi","doi":"10.1080/02604027.2023.2226594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Preassembly refers to an evolutionary mechanism that complements current theory. It proposes that genes and gene fragments, formed over the eons among libraries of noncoding genes, ultimately contributed to coding sequences. Previous publications of ours on preassembly have helped explain many enigmas that beset modern biology; for example, the Cambrian explosion (“one of the most remarkable and puzzling events in the history of life,” S. J. Gould), and the appearance of flowering plants with their sparsity of precursors (an “abominable mystery,” C. R. Darwin). The rapid evolutionary development of the domestic cat and human intelligence is also viewed as evidence for a mechanism supplementing neo-Darwinism. The current account centers on convergent evolution as interpreted via DNA preassembly. Convergent evolution refers to the development of near-identical traits in organisms that lack a common ancestor. A prime example is the remarkable similarity between the eyes of humans and octopuses. When early ancestors of these species split apart on the evolution tree, hundreds of millions of years ago, only eyespots existed. Clearly, convergent eyes in the two organisms evolved independently. Current evolutionary belief says that the eyes appeared after Nature had first screened hundreds of mutations, one at a time, and that this multistep and random process produced, fortuitously, two near identical structures. Preassembly, on the other hand, proposes primeval genes, or DNA segments, that had been collected over vast time periods within huge libraries of noncoding DNA (i.e., “preassembled genes”). Ultimately, these DNA units were incorporated into functional genes, a process possibly aided by genetic site-scanning. Graphical Abstract Key References Menger, F. M. (2017). Molecular Lamarckism. On the evolution of human intelligence. World Futures, 73, 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2017.1319669 Menger, F. M. (2020). An alternative view of evolution, how DNA was altered over geological time. Molecules, 25, 5081. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25215081 Menger, F. M., & Rizvi, S. A. A. (2021). Evolution of complexity. Molecular aspects of preassembly. Molecules, 26, 6618. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26216618","PeriodicalId":92860,"journal":{"name":"World futures review","volume":"12 1","pages":"635 - 646"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World futures review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2023.2226594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract Preassembly refers to an evolutionary mechanism that complements current theory. It proposes that genes and gene fragments, formed over the eons among libraries of noncoding genes, ultimately contributed to coding sequences. Previous publications of ours on preassembly have helped explain many enigmas that beset modern biology; for example, the Cambrian explosion (“one of the most remarkable and puzzling events in the history of life,” S. J. Gould), and the appearance of flowering plants with their sparsity of precursors (an “abominable mystery,” C. R. Darwin). The rapid evolutionary development of the domestic cat and human intelligence is also viewed as evidence for a mechanism supplementing neo-Darwinism. The current account centers on convergent evolution as interpreted via DNA preassembly. Convergent evolution refers to the development of near-identical traits in organisms that lack a common ancestor. A prime example is the remarkable similarity between the eyes of humans and octopuses. When early ancestors of these species split apart on the evolution tree, hundreds of millions of years ago, only eyespots existed. Clearly, convergent eyes in the two organisms evolved independently. Current evolutionary belief says that the eyes appeared after Nature had first screened hundreds of mutations, one at a time, and that this multistep and random process produced, fortuitously, two near identical structures. Preassembly, on the other hand, proposes primeval genes, or DNA segments, that had been collected over vast time periods within huge libraries of noncoding DNA (i.e., “preassembled genes”). Ultimately, these DNA units were incorporated into functional genes, a process possibly aided by genetic site-scanning. Graphical Abstract Key References Menger, F. M. (2017). Molecular Lamarckism. On the evolution of human intelligence. World Futures, 73, 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2017.1319669 Menger, F. M. (2020). An alternative view of evolution, how DNA was altered over geological time. Molecules, 25, 5081. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25215081 Menger, F. M., & Rizvi, S. A. A. (2021). Evolution of complexity. Molecular aspects of preassembly. Molecules, 26, 6618. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26216618
预装配是一种与现有理论互补的进化机制。它提出基因和基因片段在非编码基因文库中形成,最终促成了编码序列。我们之前关于预组装的出版物帮助解释了困扰现代生物学的许多谜题;例如,寒武纪大爆发(“生命史上最引人注目和最令人费解的事件之一,”s·j·古尔德说),以及开花植物的出现及其稀少的前体(一个“可恶的谜团”,c·r·达尔文说)。家猫和人类智力的快速进化也被视为一种补充新达尔文主义的机制的证据。目前的解释集中在趋同进化上,这是通过DNA预组装来解释的。趋同进化是指在缺乏共同祖先的生物体中发展出几乎相同的特征。一个典型的例子就是人类和章鱼的眼睛惊人的相似。数亿年前,当这些物种的早期祖先在进化树上分裂时,只有眼点存在。显然,这两种生物的趋同眼是独立进化的。目前的进化论观点认为,眼睛是在大自然第一次筛选了数百个突变之后出现的,一次一个,这个多步骤和随机的过程偶然地产生了两个几乎相同的结构。另一方面,预组装提出了原始基因或DNA片段,这些基因是在巨大的非编码DNA文库(即“预组装基因”)中经过长时间收集而成的。最终,这些DNA单元被整合到功能基因中,这一过程可能得益于基因位点扫描。图形摘要[关键参考文献]Menger, f.m.(2017)。分子拉马克学说。关于人类智力的进化。期货学报,23(3):893 - 893。https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2017.1319669门格尔,f.m.(2020)。另一种关于进化的观点,DNA是如何随着地质时间而改变的。分子学报,25,5081。https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25215081 Menger, F. M, & Rizvi, S. A. A.(2021)。复杂性的进化。预组装的分子方面。分子,26,6618。https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26216618