Voting Rights and the “Statutory Constitution”

Q2 Social Sciences

Law and Contemporary Problems Pub Date : 2018-12-26 DOI:10.2307/1192097

P. Shane

引用次数: 1

Abstract

The appeal of regarding certain statutes as having constitutional status is discussed. The possibility that certain statutes may lay claim to expressing fundamental law in a way that entitles them to be included within the range of material relevant to constitutional interpretation is examined.

查看原文本刊更多论文

投票权与“法定宪法”

讨论了将某些法规视为具有宪法地位的诉求。某些成文法可能声称以某种方式表达基本法律，使它们有权被列入与宪法解释有关的材料范围的可能性进行了审查。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Law and Contemporary Problems Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

2.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Law and Contemporary Problems was founded in 1933 and is the oldest journal published at Duke Law School. It is a quarterly, interdisciplinary, faculty-edited publication of Duke Law School. L&CP recognizes that many fields in the sciences, social sciences, and humanities can enhance the development and understanding of law. It is our purpose to seek out these areas of overlap and to publish balanced symposia that enlighten not just legal readers, but readers from these other disciplines as well. L&CP uses a symposium format, generally publishing one symposium per issue on a topic of contemporary concern. Authors and articles are selected to ensure that each issue collectively creates a unified presentation of the contemporary problem under consideration. L&CP hosts an annual conference at Duke Law School featuring the authors of one of the year’s four symposia.