5PSQ-128 Thromboprophylaxis in the emergency department. adequacy of the prescription

Á. Jofre, JI Bretones, M. Herrera Expósito, J. Urda Romacho, M. C. Castro Vida, J. Canto-Mangana
{"title":"5PSQ-128 Thromboprophylaxis in the emergency department. adequacy of the prescription","authors":"Á. Jofre, JI Bretones, M. Herrera Expósito, J. Urda Romacho, M. C. Castro Vida, J. Canto-Mangana","doi":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-eahp.459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and ImportanceIn Europe, the VITAE study estimates an annual incidence of venous thromboembolic disease (VTD) of 243/100,000 inhabitants.About 25% of VTD cases are related to hospital admissions and 50–75% of VTD cases occur in non-surgical hospitalised patients. PRETEMED is a validated thrombotic risk (TR) scale for clinical prediction that have been designed to be used in daily clinical practice. As well, it is recommended to assess the bleeding risk (BR) with another validated scale called IMPROVE scale before starting thromboprophylaxis (TP).Aim and ObjectivesDetermine the (TR/BR) and analyse whether the prescription of thromboprophylaxis in patients from the Emergency Department who are going to be admitted to the hospital ward is adequate.Material and MethodsProspective observational cohort study, carried out in a 2nd level hospital during a period of 10 days. Adult patients in the ED awaiting admission to the hospital ward were included.Patients with therapeutic effort limitation, COVID-19 patients, those who had been transfused in the last 48 hours, bleeding patients or those with underlying pathology that require anticoagulation were excluded. Using the PRETEMED/IMPROVE scales, the TR/BR was determined, as well as the indication of thromboprophylaxis.Results62 patients. 31 women (50%). The median age [range] was 71 [18–93] years. 31 patients with TP regimen, no interventions had to be performed, they had an adequate indication with PRETEMED> 4 and IMPROVE <7. 31 patients without TP regimen;7 (23%) of them had indication for TP and they went into the operating room with PRETEMED> 4 and IMPROVE <7. 7 (11.3%) of the patients required pharmaceutical intervention to adequate their TP, all of them by default.Conclusion and RelevanceThe prescription of TP in adults who visit the ED could be considered adequate in a high percentage, however it can be optimised according to the PRETEMED and IMPROVE guidelines. It is essential to recommend on the use of scales that assess TR/BR for the correct decision-making in the prescription of TP. The limitation of the study was the small sample size.References and/or AcknowledgementsConflict of InterestNo conflict of interest","PeriodicalId":19619,"journal":{"name":"Oral Presentations - Late-Breaking Proffered Abstracts","volume":"458 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Presentations - Late-Breaking Proffered Abstracts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-eahp.459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and ImportanceIn Europe, the VITAE study estimates an annual incidence of venous thromboembolic disease (VTD) of 243/100,000 inhabitants.About 25% of VTD cases are related to hospital admissions and 50–75% of VTD cases occur in non-surgical hospitalised patients. PRETEMED is a validated thrombotic risk (TR) scale for clinical prediction that have been designed to be used in daily clinical practice. As well, it is recommended to assess the bleeding risk (BR) with another validated scale called IMPROVE scale before starting thromboprophylaxis (TP).Aim and ObjectivesDetermine the (TR/BR) and analyse whether the prescription of thromboprophylaxis in patients from the Emergency Department who are going to be admitted to the hospital ward is adequate.Material and MethodsProspective observational cohort study, carried out in a 2nd level hospital during a period of 10 days. Adult patients in the ED awaiting admission to the hospital ward were included.Patients with therapeutic effort limitation, COVID-19 patients, those who had been transfused in the last 48 hours, bleeding patients or those with underlying pathology that require anticoagulation were excluded. Using the PRETEMED/IMPROVE scales, the TR/BR was determined, as well as the indication of thromboprophylaxis.Results62 patients. 31 women (50%). The median age [range] was 71 [18–93] years. 31 patients with TP regimen, no interventions had to be performed, they had an adequate indication with PRETEMED> 4 and IMPROVE <7. 31 patients without TP regimen;7 (23%) of them had indication for TP and they went into the operating room with PRETEMED> 4 and IMPROVE <7. 7 (11.3%) of the patients required pharmaceutical intervention to adequate their TP, all of them by default.Conclusion and RelevanceThe prescription of TP in adults who visit the ED could be considered adequate in a high percentage, however it can be optimised according to the PRETEMED and IMPROVE guidelines. It is essential to recommend on the use of scales that assess TR/BR for the correct decision-making in the prescription of TP. The limitation of the study was the small sample size.References and/or AcknowledgementsConflict of InterestNo conflict of interest
5PSQ-128急诊科血栓预防。处方是否充足
在欧洲,VITAE研究估计静脉血栓栓塞性疾病(VTD)的年发病率为243/10万居民。约25%的VTD个案与入院有关,而50%至75%的VTD个案发生于非手术住院病人。PRETEMED是一种经过验证的血栓形成风险(TR)量表,用于临床预测,已被设计用于日常临床实践。此外,建议在开始血栓预防(TP)之前,用另一种被称为改进量表的有效量表评估出血风险(BR)。目的和目的确定(TR/BR)并分析急诊科即将入住医院病房的患者的血栓预防处方是否足够。材料与方法前瞻性观察队列研究,在某二级医院进行为期10天的研究。在急诊科等待入住医院病房的成年患者也包括在内。排除治疗努力有限的患者、COVID-19患者、最近48小时内输血患者、出血患者或有基础病理需要抗凝的患者。使用PRETEMED/IMPROVE量表,确定TR/BR,以及血栓预防的指征。Results62病人。31名女性(50%)。中位年龄[范围]为71岁[18-93]岁。31例TP方案患者,无需干预,他们有充分的适应证PRETEMED> 4, IMPROVE 4和IMPROVE <7。7例(11.3%)患者需要药物干预以获得足够的TP,均为默认情况。结论及相关性在急诊的成人患者中,TP的处方在很大程度上是适当的,但可以根据PRETEMED和IMPROVE指南进行优化。建议使用评估TR/BR的量表对TP处方的正确决策至关重要。本研究的局限性是样本量小。参考文献和/或致谢利益冲突无利益冲突
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信