Should we be Allowing Technology to Remove "Distance" from "Distance Education"?

R. Fisher
{"title":"Should we be Allowing Technology to Remove \"Distance\" from \"Distance Education\"?","authors":"R. Fisher","doi":"10.26686/NZAROE.V0I18.1545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some researchers suggest that the rapid evolution of increasingly sophisticated e-learning technologies, in combination with synchronous delivery, have resulted in the death of distance education. This paper distinguishes traditional distance education from e-learning, on the basis of geographical separation of teachers and students, no online access requirements, and the historical rationale for distance education. These and other factors, including relative costs, point to longevity, rather than an early demise for this form of distance education. Education for sustainability (EFS) is used as a cautionary case study to illustrate the ways in which e-learning may not adequately serve the goals of EFS as well as traditional distance education. Caution is urged in the further development of e-learning policies to ensure that they distinguish traditional distance education on the basis of its ongoing, special value to learners.","PeriodicalId":92773,"journal":{"name":"Design and technology education : an international journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Design and technology education : an international journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26686/NZAROE.V0I18.1545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Some researchers suggest that the rapid evolution of increasingly sophisticated e-learning technologies, in combination with synchronous delivery, have resulted in the death of distance education. This paper distinguishes traditional distance education from e-learning, on the basis of geographical separation of teachers and students, no online access requirements, and the historical rationale for distance education. These and other factors, including relative costs, point to longevity, rather than an early demise for this form of distance education. Education for sustainability (EFS) is used as a cautionary case study to illustrate the ways in which e-learning may not adequately serve the goals of EFS as well as traditional distance education. Caution is urged in the further development of e-learning policies to ensure that they distinguish traditional distance education on the basis of its ongoing, special value to learners.
我们应该允许技术从“远程教育”中消除“距离”吗?
一些研究人员认为,日益复杂的电子学习技术的快速发展,加上同步交付,导致了远程教育的死亡。本文将传统远程教育与e-learning区分开来,基于教师和学生的地理分离,没有在线访问要求,以及远程教育的历史理论基础。这些和其他因素,包括相对成本,表明这种形式的远程教育将会长期存在,而不是过早消亡。可持续发展教育(EFS)被用作一个警示性的案例研究,以说明电子学习可能无法充分满足可持续发展教育和传统远程教育的目标。在电子学习政策的进一步发展中,应谨慎行事,以确保它们在对学习者持续的特殊价值的基础上区分传统远程教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信