SIGACT News Online Algorithms Column 33

R. V. Stee
{"title":"SIGACT News Online Algorithms Column 33","authors":"R. V. Stee","doi":"10.1145/3197406.3197417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For this issue, Matthias Englert has contributed an alternative and simpler proof of a result by Gamzu and Segev, which was in ACM Transactions on Algorithms in 2009. The problem considered in this paper was the reordering bu↵er problem on the line. Gamzu and Segev were the first to give an O(log n)-competitive algorithm for this problem, and there has been no improvement on this since then, leaving a gap with the best known lower bound of 2.154 by the same authors. Matthias’ proof shows that this result can be slightly improved (a smaller hidden constant) and simplified. Who is going to be the first to give a constant competitive algorithm, or show that this cannot be done?","PeriodicalId":22106,"journal":{"name":"SIGACT News","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIGACT News","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3197406.3197417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

For this issue, Matthias Englert has contributed an alternative and simpler proof of a result by Gamzu and Segev, which was in ACM Transactions on Algorithms in 2009. The problem considered in this paper was the reordering bu↵er problem on the line. Gamzu and Segev were the first to give an O(log n)-competitive algorithm for this problem, and there has been no improvement on this since then, leaving a gap with the best known lower bound of 2.154 by the same authors. Matthias’ proof shows that this result can be slightly improved (a smaller hidden constant) and simplified. Who is going to be the first to give a constant competitive algorithm, or show that this cannot be done?
SIGACT新闻在线算法专栏
为此,Matthias Englert在2009年的ACM Transactions on Algorithms上为Gamzu和Segev的结果提供了另一种更简单的证明。本文考虑的问题是在线上的重排序问题。Gamzu和Segev是第一个为这个问题给出O(log n)竞争算法的人,从那时起,这个算法就没有任何改进,与同一作者最著名的下界2.154有差距。Matthias的证明表明,这个结果可以稍微改进(一个更小的隐藏常数)并简化。谁会第一个给出一个恒定竞争算法,或者证明这是不可能做到的?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信