Validation of Two Rapid Serological Tests for Human Brucellosis Detection

O. Genç, Y. Çetinkol, Yas O Buyuktan�r, N. Yurdusev
{"title":"Validation of Two Rapid Serological Tests for Human Brucellosis Detection","authors":"O. Genç, Y. Çetinkol, Yas O Buyuktan�r, N. Yurdusev","doi":"10.18311/IJMDS/2019/22802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As brucellosis have several non-specific clinical phases, the search for reliable diagnosis of the disease is necessary. Therefore, for serological determination of brucellosis, rapid immunofiltration tests designated as ERIFA and NERIFA and ELISAs were developed and evaluated for diagnostic purposes. The sera were collected from Clinical Microbiology Department of Kars State Hospital between 2007 and 2009. These sera were used for determination of sensitivity of ELISAs, ERIFA and NERIFA in comparison to rose bengal test, Brucellacapt and serum agglutination tests. In the study, highest sensitivity was detected by ELISA, ERIFA and NERIFA, respectively. Specificity was highest with ELISA as 95.2% and with both ERIFA and NERIFA as 92.9% and the lowest was with RBT as 90.5%. When two ELISAs were compared based on the IgG sensitivity, there was no difference (p0.05) when IgM was accepted as a criteria for comparison. The current study reports the first evaluation of ERIFA and NERIFA in human beings. It is concluded that the RIFA models can be accepted as an ancillary test for diagnosis of human brucellosis in endemic countries.","PeriodicalId":14010,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical and Dental Sciences","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical and Dental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18311/IJMDS/2019/22802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

As brucellosis have several non-specific clinical phases, the search for reliable diagnosis of the disease is necessary. Therefore, for serological determination of brucellosis, rapid immunofiltration tests designated as ERIFA and NERIFA and ELISAs were developed and evaluated for diagnostic purposes. The sera were collected from Clinical Microbiology Department of Kars State Hospital between 2007 and 2009. These sera were used for determination of sensitivity of ELISAs, ERIFA and NERIFA in comparison to rose bengal test, Brucellacapt and serum agglutination tests. In the study, highest sensitivity was detected by ELISA, ERIFA and NERIFA, respectively. Specificity was highest with ELISA as 95.2% and with both ERIFA and NERIFA as 92.9% and the lowest was with RBT as 90.5%. When two ELISAs were compared based on the IgG sensitivity, there was no difference (p0.05) when IgM was accepted as a criteria for comparison. The current study reports the first evaluation of ERIFA and NERIFA in human beings. It is concluded that the RIFA models can be accepted as an ancillary test for diagnosis of human brucellosis in endemic countries.
两种人类布鲁氏菌病快速血清学检测方法的验证
由于布鲁氏菌病有几个非特异性临床阶段,因此有必要寻求对该疾病的可靠诊断。因此,对于布鲁氏菌病的血清学测定,开发了ERIFA和NERIFA等快速免疫过滤试验以及elisa,并对其诊断目的进行了评估。血清采集于卡尔斯州立医院临床微生物科2007 - 2009年。这些血清用于测定elisa、ERIFA和NERIFA与玫瑰孟加拉试验、布鲁氏杆菌和血清凝集试验的敏感性。ELISA、ERIFA和NERIFA检测灵敏度最高。ELISA的特异性最高,为95.2%,ERIFA和NERIFA的特异性均为92.9%,RBT的特异性最低,为90.5%。以IgG敏感性比较两种elisa时,以IgM作为比较标准无差异(p0.05)。本研究报道了ERIFA和NERIFA在人体中的首次评价。结论是,在布鲁氏菌病流行国家,可以接受RIFA模型作为诊断人布鲁氏菌病的辅助试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信