The Comparative Study of Epidural Levobupivacaine and Bupivacaine in Major Abdominal Surgeries in Type- 2 Diabetic Patient

Md Shafiul Alam Shaheen, M. Rahman, K. Sardar, Mahabubul Hasan, Md. Mushfiqur Rahman, A. Chowdhury, Raju Ahmed
{"title":"The Comparative Study of Epidural Levobupivacaine and Bupivacaine in Major Abdominal Surgeries in Type- 2 Diabetic Patient","authors":"Md Shafiul Alam Shaheen, M. Rahman, K. Sardar, Mahabubul Hasan, Md. Mushfiqur Rahman, A. Chowdhury, Raju Ahmed","doi":"10.3329/jbsa.v30i1.65309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Major abdominal surgeries still induce neurohumoral changes responsible for postoperative pain, various organ dysfunctions, prolong hospitalization and convalescence. Insufficient pain therapy prolongs the hospital stay and rises the mortality rates. Epidural analgesia confers excellent pain relief and complete dynamic analgesia leading to a substantial reduction in the surgical stress response. Opioid and local anaesthetic infusion by an epidural catheter is widely used as a postoperative pain management method after major abdominal surgeries. Type-2 Diabetic patient has many comorbidity with cardiovascular complication and they are more vulnerable to pain.\nObjectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine with fentanyl in postoperative analgesia and haemodynamic changes of type-2 Diabetic patients for major abdominal surgeries.\nMaterial and method: Sixty (60) patients were selected whose were suffering from Type-2 Diabetes mellitus and were going to be operated for major abdominal surgeries (Whipple’s procedure, FCPD, Gastrectomy, Hemi colectomy). Every patient received an epidural block in the sitting position at the T8- 9 or T9-10 level via 18 G Touhy needle. Each patient in group A received 0.125% levobupivacaine with 2 μgm. fentanyl / ml solution through epidural catheter @ 4 ml / hr. and group B were received 0.125% bupivacaine with 2 μgm. fentanyl / ml solution through epidural catheter@ 4 ml / hr\nResults: Mean visual analog scale (VAS) values of groups did not differ at all time. They were 6 at the end of the surgery (0.Min, p= 0.06). The VAS scores were not statistically significant in group A & group B (p > 0.05). The frequency of tachycardia was higher in group B that was bupivacaine group.\nConclusion: The results of our study suggest same concentration of epidural levobupivacaine and bupivacaine with fentanyl provide stable postoperative analgesia and both were found safe for the patients undergoing major abdominal surgery, but levobupivacaine is less tachycardic and safer for Type-2 Diabetic patient.\nJBSA 2017; 30(1): 5-13 ","PeriodicalId":17242,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Bangladesh Society of Anaesthesiologists","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Bangladesh Society of Anaesthesiologists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jbsa.v30i1.65309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Major abdominal surgeries still induce neurohumoral changes responsible for postoperative pain, various organ dysfunctions, prolong hospitalization and convalescence. Insufficient pain therapy prolongs the hospital stay and rises the mortality rates. Epidural analgesia confers excellent pain relief and complete dynamic analgesia leading to a substantial reduction in the surgical stress response. Opioid and local anaesthetic infusion by an epidural catheter is widely used as a postoperative pain management method after major abdominal surgeries. Type-2 Diabetic patient has many comorbidity with cardiovascular complication and they are more vulnerable to pain. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine with fentanyl in postoperative analgesia and haemodynamic changes of type-2 Diabetic patients for major abdominal surgeries. Material and method: Sixty (60) patients were selected whose were suffering from Type-2 Diabetes mellitus and were going to be operated for major abdominal surgeries (Whipple’s procedure, FCPD, Gastrectomy, Hemi colectomy). Every patient received an epidural block in the sitting position at the T8- 9 or T9-10 level via 18 G Touhy needle. Each patient in group A received 0.125% levobupivacaine with 2 μgm. fentanyl / ml solution through epidural catheter @ 4 ml / hr. and group B were received 0.125% bupivacaine with 2 μgm. fentanyl / ml solution through epidural catheter@ 4 ml / hr Results: Mean visual analog scale (VAS) values of groups did not differ at all time. They were 6 at the end of the surgery (0.Min, p= 0.06). The VAS scores were not statistically significant in group A & group B (p > 0.05). The frequency of tachycardia was higher in group B that was bupivacaine group. Conclusion: The results of our study suggest same concentration of epidural levobupivacaine and bupivacaine with fentanyl provide stable postoperative analgesia and both were found safe for the patients undergoing major abdominal surgery, but levobupivacaine is less tachycardic and safer for Type-2 Diabetic patient. JBSA 2017; 30(1): 5-13 
硬膜外左布比卡因与布比卡因在2型糖尿病腹部大手术中的比较研究
背景:腹部大手术仍然会引起神经体液变化,导致术后疼痛、各种器官功能障碍,延长住院时间和恢复期。不充分的疼痛治疗延长了住院时间,提高了死亡率。硬膜外镇痛具有良好的镇痛效果和完全的动态镇痛效果,可显著减少手术应激反应。硬膜外导管输注阿片类药物和局部麻醉被广泛用于腹部大手术后的疼痛管理方法。2型糖尿病患者有许多心血管合并症,更容易发生疼痛。目的:比较左布比卡因与布比卡因联合芬太尼对2型糖尿病腹部大手术患者术后镇痛及血流动力学变化的影响。材料与方法:选取拟行腹部大手术(惠普尔手术、FCPD、胃切除术、半结肠切除术)的2型糖尿病患者60例。每位患者均通过18g Touhy针在坐位T8- 9或T9-10位进行硬膜外阻滞。A组患者均给予0.125%左布比卡因,剂量为2 μgm。芬太尼/ ml溶液通过硬膜外导管@ 4ml / hr。B组给予0.125%布比卡因,剂量2 μgm。结果:各组平均视觉模拟评分(VAS)无显著差异。手术结束时,他们6岁(0。Min, p= 0.06)。A组、B组VAS评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。B组心动过速发生率高于布比卡因组。结论:我们的研究结果表明,相同浓度的硬膜外左布比卡因和布比卡因加芬太尼可提供稳定的术后镇痛,对腹部大手术患者都是安全的,但左布比卡因对2型糖尿病患者心动过速较小,更安全。JBSA 2017;第5 - 13 (1):30
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信