Degradation of Rifampicin, Isoniazid and Pyrazinamide from Prepared Mixtures and Marketed Single and Combination Products Under Acid Conditions

Saranjit Singh, T. Mariappan, N. Sharda, Baljinder Singh
{"title":"Degradation of Rifampicin, Isoniazid and Pyrazinamide from Prepared Mixtures and Marketed Single and Combination Products Under Acid Conditions","authors":"Saranjit Singh, T. Mariappan, N. Sharda, Baljinder Singh","doi":"10.1211/146080800128735575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was carried out to determine the extent of degradation of rifampicin, isoniazid and pyrazinamide from prepared mixtures and marketed preparations containing single, two, three and four drugs, under stomach conditions. \n \nDegradation studies were carried out in 0.1 M HC1 at 37°C for 50 min. A comparative study in simulated gastric fluid was also done. Under both conditions, rifampicin was decomposed by 17.8–24.4%, isoniazid to a lesser extent (3.2–4.7%), and pyrazinamide was stable. The decomposition of rifampicin was influenced by the presence of isoniazid but not by pyrazinamide or ethambutol. Compared with pure drugs and mixtures, wide variations in the decomposition of rifampicin (7.5–33.3%) and isoniazid (1.4–5.3%) were found in the marketed fixed-dose combinations, indicating the influence of formulation and storage conditions. \n \nThe results suggest that the poor bioavailability of rifampicin might be in part due to the decomposition of the drug in the stomach. The recent WHO protocol suggests the comparison of the test fixed-dose combination preparations against a combination of separate formulations of two, three or four drugs. However, it may be more meaningful to carry out bioequivalence studies on fixed-dose combination formulations by comparing the test fixed-dose combination preparations with the standard formulations of individual drugs.","PeriodicalId":19946,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy and Pharmacology Communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"46","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy and Pharmacology Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1211/146080800128735575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine the extent of degradation of rifampicin, isoniazid and pyrazinamide from prepared mixtures and marketed preparations containing single, two, three and four drugs, under stomach conditions. Degradation studies were carried out in 0.1 M HC1 at 37°C for 50 min. A comparative study in simulated gastric fluid was also done. Under both conditions, rifampicin was decomposed by 17.8–24.4%, isoniazid to a lesser extent (3.2–4.7%), and pyrazinamide was stable. The decomposition of rifampicin was influenced by the presence of isoniazid but not by pyrazinamide or ethambutol. Compared with pure drugs and mixtures, wide variations in the decomposition of rifampicin (7.5–33.3%) and isoniazid (1.4–5.3%) were found in the marketed fixed-dose combinations, indicating the influence of formulation and storage conditions. The results suggest that the poor bioavailability of rifampicin might be in part due to the decomposition of the drug in the stomach. The recent WHO protocol suggests the comparison of the test fixed-dose combination preparations against a combination of separate formulations of two, three or four drugs. However, it may be more meaningful to carry out bioequivalence studies on fixed-dose combination formulations by comparing the test fixed-dose combination preparations with the standard formulations of individual drugs.
利福平、异烟肼和吡嗪酰胺配制混合物及上市单药和复方产品在酸性条件下的降解
本研究旨在确定利福平、异烟肼和吡嗪酰胺在胃条件下的降解程度,这些利福平、异烟肼和吡嗪酰胺是由含有单一、两种、三种和四种药物的配制混合物和市售制剂组成的。在37°C、0.1 M HC1中进行了50分钟的降解研究,并在模拟胃液中进行了比较研究。两种条件下,利福平的分解率为17.8 ~ 24.4%,异烟肼的分解率较低(3.2 ~ 4.7%),吡嗪酰胺的分解率较稳定。异烟肼的存在对利福平的分解有影响,吡嗪酰胺和乙胺丁醇的存在对利福平的分解没有影响。与纯药和混合药相比,利福平(7.5 ~ 33.3%)和异烟肼(1.4 ~ 5.3%)在市场上的固定剂量组合中分解率差异较大,说明处方和储存条件的影响。研究结果表明,利福平生物利用度低的部分原因可能是由于药物在胃中的分解。世卫组织最近的方案建议将试验固定剂量联合制剂与由两种、三种或四种药物组成的单独制剂的组合进行比较。然而,通过将试验固定剂量联合制剂与单个药物的标准制剂进行比较,开展固定剂量联合制剂的生物等效性研究可能更有意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信