{"title":"Evaluasi program mahasiswa wirausaha dengan model cipo di Universitas Brawijaya dan Universitas Negeri Malang","authors":"Ahmad Ahmad","doi":"10.21831/PEP.V22I2.16577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi implementasi kebijakan Program Mahasiswa Wirausaha pada Universitas Brawijaya dan Universitas Negeri Malang di Jawa Timur. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan evaluatif yang berbasis kasus pada kedua universitas pelaksana PMW dengan metode evaluasi program dengan model CIPO. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) Konteks evaluasi, suatu perencanaan PMW merujuk pada latar belakang, landasan formal dan operasional pelaksanaan, tujuan, dan manfaat bagi pemangku kepentingan dengan capaian evaluasinya tinggi; (2) Input evaluasi, adanya perbedaan mekanisme pengalokasian dana bantuan antara PMW-UB dan PMW-UM yang menyebabkan capaian evaluasinya moderat, sedangkan pada indikator lain capaian evaluasinya tinggi; (3) Proses evaluasi, terdapat enam belas kriteria evaluasi yang berkategori tinggi, enam kriteria evaluasi yang berkategori moderat dan dua kriteria evaluasi yang berkategori rendah; sedangkan (4) Output evaluasi, indikator mahasiswa yang berwirausaha dan unit usaha yang dikembangkan mahasiswa dengan evaluasi capaiannya rendah.Kata kunci: Program Mahasiswa Wirausaha, Model Evaluasi CIPO EVALUATION OF STUDENT ENTREPRENEUR PROGRAM WITH CIPO MODEL IN BRAWIJAYA UNIVERSITY AND THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF MALANGAbstractThis research is aimed at evaluating the implementation of the Student Entrepreneurial Program policies at Brawijaya University and the State University of Malang in East Java. This study uses a case-based evaluative approach at both University, Brawijaya University and the State University of Malang with program evaluation methods. The model used in this research was CIPO model. The results showed: Context evaluation, a PMW planning refers to background, formal foundation and operational implementation, purpose, and benefits for the stakeholders to the achievement of a high evaluation; Input evaluation, the difference in the mechanism of allocating funds between PMW-UB and PMW-UM is causing moderate evaluation outcomes, whereas the other indicators of high achievement evaluation; Process evaluation, there are sixteen high-category evaluation criteria, six criteria of moderate categorization and two low evaluation criteria; and outputs evaluation, indicators student entrepreneurship and business unit developed a student with low achievements evaluation. Keywords: Student Entrepreneurship Program, CIPO Evaluation Model","PeriodicalId":33364,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21831/PEP.V22I2.16577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi implementasi kebijakan Program Mahasiswa Wirausaha pada Universitas Brawijaya dan Universitas Negeri Malang di Jawa Timur. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan evaluatif yang berbasis kasus pada kedua universitas pelaksana PMW dengan metode evaluasi program dengan model CIPO. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) Konteks evaluasi, suatu perencanaan PMW merujuk pada latar belakang, landasan formal dan operasional pelaksanaan, tujuan, dan manfaat bagi pemangku kepentingan dengan capaian evaluasinya tinggi; (2) Input evaluasi, adanya perbedaan mekanisme pengalokasian dana bantuan antara PMW-UB dan PMW-UM yang menyebabkan capaian evaluasinya moderat, sedangkan pada indikator lain capaian evaluasinya tinggi; (3) Proses evaluasi, terdapat enam belas kriteria evaluasi yang berkategori tinggi, enam kriteria evaluasi yang berkategori moderat dan dua kriteria evaluasi yang berkategori rendah; sedangkan (4) Output evaluasi, indikator mahasiswa yang berwirausaha dan unit usaha yang dikembangkan mahasiswa dengan evaluasi capaiannya rendah.Kata kunci: Program Mahasiswa Wirausaha, Model Evaluasi CIPO EVALUATION OF STUDENT ENTREPRENEUR PROGRAM WITH CIPO MODEL IN BRAWIJAYA UNIVERSITY AND THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF MALANGAbstractThis research is aimed at evaluating the implementation of the Student Entrepreneurial Program policies at Brawijaya University and the State University of Malang in East Java. This study uses a case-based evaluative approach at both University, Brawijaya University and the State University of Malang with program evaluation methods. The model used in this research was CIPO model. The results showed: Context evaluation, a PMW planning refers to background, formal foundation and operational implementation, purpose, and benefits for the stakeholders to the achievement of a high evaluation; Input evaluation, the difference in the mechanism of allocating funds between PMW-UB and PMW-UM is causing moderate evaluation outcomes, whereas the other indicators of high achievement evaluation; Process evaluation, there are sixteen high-category evaluation criteria, six criteria of moderate categorization and two low evaluation criteria; and outputs evaluation, indicators student entrepreneurship and business unit developed a student with low achievements evaluation. Keywords: Student Entrepreneurship Program, CIPO Evaluation Model
本研究旨在评估布拉维贾雅大学(Brawijaya university)和爪哇岛东部马朗国立大学(foreima university)企业家计划政策的执行。本研究采用了一种基于案件的评估方法,用于两所PMW执行大学,其项目评估方法与CIPO模型。研究结果表明:(1)评估背景、PMW规划是指背景、正式的执行基础、目标和对利益相关者进行高评价的好处;(2)评估输入,PMW-UB和PMW-UM之间分配援助机制存在差异,导致适度评估进展,而在其他指标上,评估进展高;(3)评估过程包括16个高级评估标准,6个适度评价标准和2个低评价标准;然而(4)绩效考核是学生企业家的指标,也是学生成绩较差发展起来的企业单位。关键词:大学生创业项目,评估模型CIPO调查员的学生企业家项目布拉维贾雅CIPO模型在大学和《MALANGAbstractThis STATE UNIVERSITY)研究是aimed at evaluating implementation》项目的学生企业家布拉维贾雅政策at UNIVERSITY)和《东爪哇可怜的州立大学。这项研究是对两所大学、布拉维贾雅大学和不幸的州立大学的评估方法进行的基于假设的评估。这个研究中使用的模型是模型。结果被证明:背景调查、PMW计划转诊为背景、正式基础和运作,为高评价的成就提供利益;评估输入,PMW-UB和PMW-UM之间相对作用的差异应该通过,而其他高成就评估的参与者则在这里;量规评估,有16个专品店,6个专品店和2个低评价准则;学生评审团和商业单位培养了一个低成就评估的学生。学生短语:模拟评估计划