Trends in Lymphadenectomy for Esophageal/Esophagogastric Junction Cancer

Erica Nishimura, S. Matsuda, M. Takeuchi, H. Kawakubo, Y. Kitagawa
{"title":"Trends in Lymphadenectomy for Esophageal/Esophagogastric Junction Cancer","authors":"Erica Nishimura, S. Matsuda, M. Takeuchi, H. Kawakubo, Y. Kitagawa","doi":"10.3390/lymphatics1020008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lymph node (LN) metastasis is recognized to be an important prognostic factor for esophageal cancer (EC). However, there is no worldwide uniform classification system, and no consensus exists on the extent of the lymphadenectomy. Recently, an international observational cohort study was conducted to evaluate the distribution of LN metastasis in EC patients. Moreover, this could be a milestone to establish a standard classification system and provide new insights to determine the extent of LNs that should be target for treatment. With regard to surgical procedures, three-field lymphadenectomy seems to be promising to improve the prognosis with EC patients. However, extended lymphadenectomy could lead to postoperative complications. The development of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has allowed us to retrieve cervical paraesophageal nodes without cervical incision and reduce the incidence of postoperative complications. Therefore, it may be possible that the era of MIE could propose the modern extent of LN dissection in the future. Additionally, one of the key components in lymphadenectomy for EC was thoracic duct and surrounding tissues. Although there is some evidence of LN metastasis surrounding the TD, the survival benefit of TD resection is still debatable. With regard to esophagogastiric junction cancer, the extent of LN dissection could be determined by the length of esophageal involvement. We believe further understanding of LN metastasis of EC patients will contribute to establish a global standard of treatment and improve their prognosis.","PeriodicalId":18718,"journal":{"name":"Microcirculation, endothelium, and lymphatics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microcirculation, endothelium, and lymphatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/lymphatics1020008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lymph node (LN) metastasis is recognized to be an important prognostic factor for esophageal cancer (EC). However, there is no worldwide uniform classification system, and no consensus exists on the extent of the lymphadenectomy. Recently, an international observational cohort study was conducted to evaluate the distribution of LN metastasis in EC patients. Moreover, this could be a milestone to establish a standard classification system and provide new insights to determine the extent of LNs that should be target for treatment. With regard to surgical procedures, three-field lymphadenectomy seems to be promising to improve the prognosis with EC patients. However, extended lymphadenectomy could lead to postoperative complications. The development of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has allowed us to retrieve cervical paraesophageal nodes without cervical incision and reduce the incidence of postoperative complications. Therefore, it may be possible that the era of MIE could propose the modern extent of LN dissection in the future. Additionally, one of the key components in lymphadenectomy for EC was thoracic duct and surrounding tissues. Although there is some evidence of LN metastasis surrounding the TD, the survival benefit of TD resection is still debatable. With regard to esophagogastiric junction cancer, the extent of LN dissection could be determined by the length of esophageal involvement. We believe further understanding of LN metastasis of EC patients will contribute to establish a global standard of treatment and improve their prognosis.
食管/食管胃结癌淋巴结切除术的发展趋势
淋巴结(LN)转移是食管癌(EC)预后的重要因素。然而,目前尚无全球统一的分类系统,对淋巴结切除术的范围也没有共识。最近,国际上进行了一项观察性队列研究,以评估淋巴结转移在EC患者中的分布。此外,这可能是建立标准分类系统的里程碑,并为确定应作为治疗目标的LNs的程度提供新的见解。在外科手术方面,三野淋巴结切除术似乎有望改善EC患者的预后。然而,扩大淋巴结切除术可能导致术后并发症。微创食管切除术(MIE)的发展使我们可以在不切开颈部的情况下取出颈部食管旁淋巴结,减少了术后并发症的发生率。因此,有可能在MIE时代提出未来LN解剖的现代程度。此外,淋巴结切除术治疗EC的关键组成部分之一是胸导管和周围组织。虽然有一些证据表明,淋巴结转移周围的输尿管输尿管切除术的生存效益仍然是有争议的。对于食管胃结癌,淋巴结清扫的程度可以通过食管受累的长度来判断。我们相信进一步了解EC患者的淋巴结转移将有助于建立全球治疗标准并改善其预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信