Anxiety sensitivity: An examination of theoretical and methodological issues

Scott O Lilienfeld , Samuel M Turner , Rolf G Jacob
{"title":"Anxiety sensitivity: An examination of theoretical and methodological issues","authors":"Scott O Lilienfeld ,&nbsp;Samuel M Turner ,&nbsp;Rolf G Jacob","doi":"10.1016/0146-6402(93)90019-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The construct of anxiety sensitivity (AS) has occupied an increasingly important place in theorizing and research on anxiety and anxiety disorders. Although a number of recent studies have provided support for the construct validity of the principal operationalization of AS, the Anxiety Sensitivity Index (ASI), the relation of the AS construct and the ASI to trait anxiety continues to be a source of controversy. Key issues in the AS-trait anxiety debate include the assimilative nature of traits and the concept of incremental validity. Recent research on AS lends some support to the claim that trait anxiety cannot fully account for AS findings. Important areas for future AS research include (1) demonstrating that AS is a risk factor for panic disorder and related conditions, lather than simply a consequence of these conditions, (2) developing and utilizing multiple operationalizations of constructs, (3) minimizing the impact of potentially inapplicable items, (4) testing for interactions between AS and other variables, and (5) testing hierarchical factor models that allow trait anxiety and AS to coexist as higher- and lower-order factors, respectively. Researchers in this area will need to develop alternative measures of the AS construct, recognize the distinction between different levels of trait specificity, clarify a number of theoretical issues relevant to the AS construct, and continue to subject predictions to stringent theoretical risks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100041,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"15 2","pages":"Pages 147-183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0146-6402(93)90019-X","citationCount":"173","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/014664029390019X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 173

Abstract

The construct of anxiety sensitivity (AS) has occupied an increasingly important place in theorizing and research on anxiety and anxiety disorders. Although a number of recent studies have provided support for the construct validity of the principal operationalization of AS, the Anxiety Sensitivity Index (ASI), the relation of the AS construct and the ASI to trait anxiety continues to be a source of controversy. Key issues in the AS-trait anxiety debate include the assimilative nature of traits and the concept of incremental validity. Recent research on AS lends some support to the claim that trait anxiety cannot fully account for AS findings. Important areas for future AS research include (1) demonstrating that AS is a risk factor for panic disorder and related conditions, lather than simply a consequence of these conditions, (2) developing and utilizing multiple operationalizations of constructs, (3) minimizing the impact of potentially inapplicable items, (4) testing for interactions between AS and other variables, and (5) testing hierarchical factor models that allow trait anxiety and AS to coexist as higher- and lower-order factors, respectively. Researchers in this area will need to develop alternative measures of the AS construct, recognize the distinction between different levels of trait specificity, clarify a number of theoretical issues relevant to the AS construct, and continue to subject predictions to stringent theoretical risks.

焦虑敏感性:理论和方法问题的检查
焦虑敏感性的建构在焦虑和焦虑障碍的理论和研究中占有越来越重要的地位。虽然最近的一些研究为AS的主要操作化——焦虑敏感指数(ASI)的构式效度提供了支持,但AS构式和ASI与特质焦虑的关系仍然是一个争议的来源。as特质焦虑争论的关键问题包括特质的同化性质和增量效度的概念。最近对AS的研究为特质焦虑不能完全解释AS的发现提供了一些支持。未来AS研究的重要领域包括:(1)证明AS是恐慌障碍和相关疾病的风险因素,而不仅仅是这些疾病的后果;(2)开发和利用多种构式的操作化;(3)最小化潜在不适用项目的影响;(4)测试AS与其他变量之间的相互作用。(5)检验允许特质焦虑和AS分别作为高阶和低阶因素共存的层次因子模型。这一领域的研究人员将需要开发AS结构的替代测量方法,认识到不同水平特质特异性之间的区别,澄清与AS结构相关的一些理论问题,并继续将预测置于严格的理论风险之下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信