Library Service Platforms (LSPs) Characteristics Classification and Importance Ranking through DELPHI Method Application

Q2 Social Sciences

International Information and Library Review Pub Date : 2020-10-30 DOI:10.1080/10572317.2020.1840001

D. Kouis, G. Agiorgitis

引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of this research is to identify the innovative features of the LSPs that differentiate them from the LMS, as well as to evaluate their importance, based on the opinions of the Greek information scientists. The method used is the Delphi 2-round questionnaire. The results show that the experts most value an all-in-one system that incorporates all modules within it, instead of different collaborating software. Interoperability between systems, the adoption of new metadata standards, the SaaS architecture and the multi-tenant model are also held in high regard. In contrast, the use of the mobile library applications feature has achieved low ranking.

查看原文本刊更多论文

基于DELPHI法的图书馆服务平台特征分类及重要性排序

摘要本研究的目的是根据希腊信息科学家的观点，确定lsp与LMS区别的创新特征，并评估其重要性。采用德尔菲二轮问卷法。结果表明，专家们最看重的是一个集成所有模块的一体化系统，而不是不同的协作软件。系统之间的互操作性、新元数据标准的采用、SaaS架构和多租户模型也受到高度重视。相比之下，使用移动图书馆应用功能的排名却很低。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Information and Library Review Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences

CiteScore

2.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： For more than twenty years, the International Information and Library Review has been welcomed by information scientists, librarians and other scholars and practitioners all over the world for its timely articles on research and development in international and comparative librarianship, information sciences, information policy and information ethics, digital values and digital libraries. Contributions to the journal have come from staff or members of many different international organizations, including the United Nations, UNESCO, IFLA, and INTAMEL, and from library and information scientists in academia, government, industry, and other organizations.