No going back: The struggle for a post-Roe reproductive justice

IF 1.3 2区文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION

Quarterly Journal of Speech Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI:10.1080/00335630.2022.2128204

Natalie Fixmer-Oraiz

引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT We inhabit a world fundamentally transformed in the decades since Roe v. Wade. This includes seismic shifts wrought by the rise of homeland security culture, wherein intense digital surveillance and privacy violations are figured as both pedestrian and inevitable. It is no coincidence that the evisceration of constitutionally-protected abortion care under the right to “privacy” specifically unfolds in this moment. There is no going back. Moving forward entails understanding the Dobbs decision in the broader context of homeland security culture and a centering of reproductive justice as critical to US democracy.

查看原文本刊更多论文

不回头:为后roe案件的生殖正义而奋斗

自罗伊诉韦德案以来的几十年里，我们所处的世界发生了根本性的变化。这包括国土安全文化的兴起所带来的翻天覆地的变化，在这种文化中，密集的数字监控和侵犯隐私被认为是既平常又不可避免的。受宪法保护的堕胎护理在“隐私权”下被彻底掏空，正是在这个时刻展开，这并非巧合。没有回头路。向前推进需要在国土安全文化的更广泛背景下理解多布斯案的决定，并将生殖正义作为美国民主的关键。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Quarterly Journal of Speech COMMUNICATION-

CiteScore

1.80

自引率

36.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Quarterly Journal of Speech (QJS) publishes articles and book reviews of interest to those who take a rhetorical perspective on the texts, discourses, and cultural practices by which public beliefs and identities are constituted, empowered, and enacted. Rhetorical scholarship now cuts across many different intellectual, disciplinary, and political vectors, and QJS seeks to honor and address the interanimating effects of such differences. No single project, whether modern or postmodern in its orientation, or local, national, or global in its scope, can suffice as the sole locus of rhetorical practice, knowledge and understanding.