Mudmat Analysis of Jacket Structure - Case Study

N. Nagaraju, C. Kumar, Nitin Varghese
{"title":"Mudmat Analysis of Jacket Structure - Case Study","authors":"N. Nagaraju, C. Kumar, Nitin Varghese","doi":"10.2118/197799-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A jacket structure is designed to support a platform required for drilling and production facilities. The jacket is subjected to complex, multi-directional loading during installation. Overturning moments from wind, current and wave loads are skewed from overturning moments from pile and jacket weight eccentricity. The mudmat geometry can be simple with symmetrical mudmats at the four corners of the jacket base or can be complex due to full rectangular area with an off-center, open, rectangular bay for conductor installation. Mudmat geometry, loads during pile installation and soil conditions combined to produce a challenging overturning stability problem. Equivalent area methods of API RP 2GEO and ISO 19901-4 may not predict the low overturning resistance, and a typical righting moment analysis may not capture the soil-structure interaction. To address the geometry and complex loading, a plasticity analysis of overturning stability was performed and is described herein.\n Partial safety factors as recommended by API RP 2GEO, ISO 19901-4 were used to assess stability so that overturning from the jacket dead weight could be treated separately from the wind, current and wave loading. Since the partial safety factors are lower for the stabilizing forces compared to the forces causing overturning moments, the resulting safety factors can be lower. Moment and force equilibrium were imposed, and the minimum overturning safety factor was found. Although the vector sum of the factored loads was oriented away from a principal axis of the mudmat, upper bound plasticity methods were used to investigate kinematically admissible failure mechanisms. The method of analysis easily accounts for irregular foundation geometry and complex, multidirectional loading with varying degrees of uncertainty. The method fills a gap in API RP 2GEO and can be implemented in a simple spreadsheet.\n A case study is presented to demonstrate the safety factor variation using API RP 2GEO method and the proposed failure method with varying eccentricity in the gravity loads and overturning moments due to wind, current and wave loads.","PeriodicalId":11061,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, November 11, 2019","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, November 11, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/197799-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A jacket structure is designed to support a platform required for drilling and production facilities. The jacket is subjected to complex, multi-directional loading during installation. Overturning moments from wind, current and wave loads are skewed from overturning moments from pile and jacket weight eccentricity. The mudmat geometry can be simple with symmetrical mudmats at the four corners of the jacket base or can be complex due to full rectangular area with an off-center, open, rectangular bay for conductor installation. Mudmat geometry, loads during pile installation and soil conditions combined to produce a challenging overturning stability problem. Equivalent area methods of API RP 2GEO and ISO 19901-4 may not predict the low overturning resistance, and a typical righting moment analysis may not capture the soil-structure interaction. To address the geometry and complex loading, a plasticity analysis of overturning stability was performed and is described herein. Partial safety factors as recommended by API RP 2GEO, ISO 19901-4 were used to assess stability so that overturning from the jacket dead weight could be treated separately from the wind, current and wave loading. Since the partial safety factors are lower for the stabilizing forces compared to the forces causing overturning moments, the resulting safety factors can be lower. Moment and force equilibrium were imposed, and the minimum overturning safety factor was found. Although the vector sum of the factored loads was oriented away from a principal axis of the mudmat, upper bound plasticity methods were used to investigate kinematically admissible failure mechanisms. The method of analysis easily accounts for irregular foundation geometry and complex, multidirectional loading with varying degrees of uncertainty. The method fills a gap in API RP 2GEO and can be implemented in a simple spreadsheet. A case study is presented to demonstrate the safety factor variation using API RP 2GEO method and the proposed failure method with varying eccentricity in the gravity loads and overturning moments due to wind, current and wave loads.
夹套结构的泥板分析-个案研究
夹套结构设计用于支撑钻井和生产设施所需的平台。夹套在安装过程中承受复杂的多向载荷。由风、水流和波浪荷载引起的倾覆力矩与由桩和护套重量偏心引起的倾覆力矩相偏斜。泥垫的几何形状可以很简单,在护套底座的四个角落都有对称的泥垫,也可以很复杂,因为整个矩形区域都有一个偏离中心的、开放的矩形槽,用于安装导体。泥层几何形状、桩安装过程中的荷载和土壤条件共同产生了具有挑战性的倾覆稳定性问题。API RP 2GEO和ISO 19901-4的等效面积方法可能无法预测低倾覆阻力,典型的扭转力矩分析可能无法捕获土-结构相互作用。为了解决几何和复杂载荷,进行了倾覆稳定性的塑性分析,并在此进行了描述。采用API RP 2GEO和ISO 19901-4推荐的部分安全系数来评估稳定性,以便将导管套自重引起的倾覆与风、流和波浪载荷分开处理。由于稳定力的部分安全系数比引起倾覆力矩的力低,因此产生的安全系数可以更低。通过施加力矩和力平衡,求出最小倾覆安全系数。虽然因子荷载的矢量和取向远离泥地的主轴,但上限塑性方法被用于研究运动学上允许的破坏机制。这种分析方法易于考虑不规则的基础几何形状和复杂的多向不确定性荷载。该方法填补了API RP 2GEO的空白,可以在一个简单的电子表格中实现。通过实例验证了API RP - 2GEO方法在重力荷载和风、流、浪作用下倾覆力矩变化时的安全系数变化,以及所提出的破坏方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信