She/Her/Hers

Moira L. Ozias, Z. Nicolazzo
{"title":"She/Her/Hers","authors":"Moira L. Ozias, Z. Nicolazzo","doi":"10.25159/2957-3645/10493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gender is a catastrophic oppressive imposition. Gender structures and is structured by settler colonialism, just as it marks and is marked by ongoing investments in anti-blackness. Not only is gender a violent erasure of Indigenous ways of being, but as Spillers (1987) detailed, gender—specifically femininity and womanness—are foreclosed to Black women as an ongoing effect of chattel slavery. In this article, we focus on the pronouns she, her and hers as an artifact of white womanness. In so doing, we trace how white women not only articulate gender as a site of possession—here we specifically draw on Harris’s (1993) notion of the absolute right to exclude—but consume gender in a move toward necrocapitalism. Put another way, white women consume gender to further their presumed goodness, at the same time as—and indeed as a function of—desiring the death of trans women. As a result, trans women are rendered killable subjects, with their killability acting as a necessity for the furtherance of the catastrophe of gender itself. Through the commodification of the pronoun as a signifier of gender (e.g. pronoun stickers and pins, the performative nature of bringing trans women to speak without any resulting transformative change), we argue this acts to further necrocapitalism, especially in the notion “economy of deadly violence”, as it “ensures the maintenance of authority’s spread and permanence” (Sheehi in conversation with Shalhoub-Kevorkian; see Introduction to this special issue for further details).","PeriodicalId":89999,"journal":{"name":"Journal of social, behavioral and health sciences","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of social, behavioral and health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25159/2957-3645/10493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gender is a catastrophic oppressive imposition. Gender structures and is structured by settler colonialism, just as it marks and is marked by ongoing investments in anti-blackness. Not only is gender a violent erasure of Indigenous ways of being, but as Spillers (1987) detailed, gender—specifically femininity and womanness—are foreclosed to Black women as an ongoing effect of chattel slavery. In this article, we focus on the pronouns she, her and hers as an artifact of white womanness. In so doing, we trace how white women not only articulate gender as a site of possession—here we specifically draw on Harris’s (1993) notion of the absolute right to exclude—but consume gender in a move toward necrocapitalism. Put another way, white women consume gender to further their presumed goodness, at the same time as—and indeed as a function of—desiring the death of trans women. As a result, trans women are rendered killable subjects, with their killability acting as a necessity for the furtherance of the catastrophe of gender itself. Through the commodification of the pronoun as a signifier of gender (e.g. pronoun stickers and pins, the performative nature of bringing trans women to speak without any resulting transformative change), we argue this acts to further necrocapitalism, especially in the notion “economy of deadly violence”, as it “ensures the maintenance of authority’s spread and permanence” (Sheehi in conversation with Shalhoub-Kevorkian; see Introduction to this special issue for further details).
她/她/她的
性别是一种灾难性的压迫。性别结构是由移民殖民主义构成的,正如它标志着并标志着对反黑人的持续投资。性别不仅是对土著存在方式的暴力抹杀,而且正如斯皮勒斯(1987)所详述的那样,性别——尤其是女性气质和女性气质——作为奴隶制度的持续影响,被黑人女性剥夺了抵押品。在这篇文章中,我们主要关注代词她,她和她的作为白人女性的人工制品。在这样做的过程中,我们追溯了白人女性如何不仅将性别作为占有的场所来表达——这里我们特别借鉴了哈里斯(1993)的绝对排他权的概念——而且在走向死亡资本主义的过程中消费性别。换句话说,白人女性消费性别是为了进一步提升她们假定的善良,与此同时——实际上是作为一种功能——她们渴望跨性别女性的死亡。结果,跨性别女性成为了可杀的对象,她们的可杀性成为了推动性别本身灾难的必要条件。通过将代词商品化作为性别的能指(例如,代词贴纸和别针,使跨性别女性在没有任何变革的情况下发言的表演性质),我们认为这进一步推动了死亡资本主义,特别是在“致命暴力经济”的概念中,因为它“确保了权威的传播和持久性的维持”(Sheehi在与Shalhoub-Kevorkian的谈话中;有关详细信息,请参阅本特刊的介绍)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信