Gisbertus Voetius on Meditation and Learned Ignorance: Mysticism, The Devotio Moderna and the Nadere Reformatie

IF 0.1 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES
M. Baines
{"title":"Gisbertus Voetius on Meditation and Learned Ignorance: Mysticism, The Devotio Moderna and the Nadere Reformatie","authors":"M. Baines","doi":"10.1080/14622459.2022.2153100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Gisbertus Voetius, intellectual head of the Nadere Reformatie, commends an eclectic range of medieval and mystical thinkers with links to the Devotio moderna including Thomas Aquinas, Denys the Carthusian and Nicholas of Cusa. Voetius draws appreciatively but critically on Aquinas and Denys in his exploration of meditation or contemplation. Voetius is also influenced by Cusa’s doctrine of learned ignorance. Voetius goes beyond Aquinas, for whom contemplation is essentially and primarily an act of the intellect, and even beyond Denys, for whom affection is virtually included in contemplation, and draws heavily on Cusa's theory of learned ignorance, which provides a certain unity of contemplation and affection, as well as a tight integration of faith and reason. This article builds on a recent groundswell of interest in the modern reception of Cusa, correcting and extending previous scholarship. It also addresses an important lacuna in the scholarship on Protestant mysticism.","PeriodicalId":41309,"journal":{"name":"REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW","volume":"12 1","pages":"161 - 187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14622459.2022.2153100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Gisbertus Voetius, intellectual head of the Nadere Reformatie, commends an eclectic range of medieval and mystical thinkers with links to the Devotio moderna including Thomas Aquinas, Denys the Carthusian and Nicholas of Cusa. Voetius draws appreciatively but critically on Aquinas and Denys in his exploration of meditation or contemplation. Voetius is also influenced by Cusa’s doctrine of learned ignorance. Voetius goes beyond Aquinas, for whom contemplation is essentially and primarily an act of the intellect, and even beyond Denys, for whom affection is virtually included in contemplation, and draws heavily on Cusa's theory of learned ignorance, which provides a certain unity of contemplation and affection, as well as a tight integration of faith and reason. This article builds on a recent groundswell of interest in the modern reception of Cusa, correcting and extending previous scholarship. It also addresses an important lacuna in the scholarship on Protestant mysticism.
吉斯伯特斯·沃提乌斯论冥想与习得性无知:神秘主义、现代信仰与Nadere改革派
纳德尔改革派的知识分子领袖吉斯伯特斯·沃提乌斯赞扬了一系列与现代信仰有联系的中世纪和神秘主义思想家,包括托马斯·阿奎那、卡尔萨斯派的丹尼斯和库萨的尼古拉斯。沃提乌斯在他对冥想或沉思的探索中既欣赏又批判地借鉴了阿奎那和丹尼斯。沃提乌斯也受到库萨的博学无知学说的影响。沃提乌斯超越了阿奎那,对阿奎那来说,沉思基本上是智力的一种行为,甚至超越了丹尼斯,对丹尼斯来说,情感实际上包含在沉思中,并大量借鉴了库萨的博学无知理论,该理论提供了沉思和情感的某种统一,以及信仰和理性的紧密结合。本文建立在最近对库萨的现代接受感兴趣的基础上,纠正和扩展了以前的奖学金。它还解决了新教神秘主义学术研究的一个重要空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW
REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信