Ethical, Legal, and Pedagogical Issues in edTPA

IF 0.6 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
K. Gilbert, Nai-Cheng Kuo
{"title":"Ethical, Legal, and Pedagogical Issues in edTPA","authors":"K. Gilbert, Nai-Cheng Kuo","doi":"10.14288/CE.V10I8.186418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to address ethical, legal, and pedagogical issues in the use of edTPA, a mandatory and consequential assessment required for teacher candidates in many states. We discuss issues such as the cost of edTPA, implicit bias in scoring teacher candidates, marginalization in K-12 settings, property rights, privacy, and disconnections between the real classroom and what teacher candidates are asked to do in edTPA. At the end of the paper we make three suggestions. First, edTPA can be used as a learning progression assessment, but not a high-stakes assessment. Second, private publishers should play an assistive role, not a dominant role, in teacher education. Third, educators should examine the rubrics of edTPA within and across disciplines to reduce inappropriate practices.","PeriodicalId":10808,"journal":{"name":"Critical Education","volume":"46 1","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14288/CE.V10I8.186418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to address ethical, legal, and pedagogical issues in the use of edTPA, a mandatory and consequential assessment required for teacher candidates in many states. We discuss issues such as the cost of edTPA, implicit bias in scoring teacher candidates, marginalization in K-12 settings, property rights, privacy, and disconnections between the real classroom and what teacher candidates are asked to do in edTPA. At the end of the paper we make three suggestions. First, edTPA can be used as a learning progression assessment, but not a high-stakes assessment. Second, private publishers should play an assistive role, not a dominant role, in teacher education. Third, educators should examine the rubrics of edTPA within and across disciplines to reduce inappropriate practices.
edTPA中的伦理、法律和教学问题
本文的目的是解决使用edTPA的道德、法律和教学问题,edTPA是许多州要求教师候选人进行的强制性和间接的评估。我们讨论了edTPA的成本、对教师候选人评分的隐性偏见、K-12环境中的边缘化、财产权、隐私以及真实课堂与教师候选人在edTPA中被要求做的事情之间的脱节。文章最后提出了三点建议。首先,edTPA可以用作学习进展评估,但不是高风险评估。第二,民营出版商在教师教育中应该发挥辅助作用,而不是主导作用。第三,教育工作者应该检查学科内部和跨学科的edTPA规则,以减少不适当的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Education
Critical Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
30.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信