{"title":"Poetry in a World of Things: Aesthetics and Empiricism in Renaissance Ekphrasis","authors":"D. Mitchell","doi":"10.1215/00166928-8847214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Les Amours would lead to more profitable long-term patronage. This approach to craftsmanship is reflected both thematically in his poetry and economically in his publishing practices. Kennedy reveals how Ronsard recycled poems between one collection of poetry dedicated to Cassandra Salviati and a later one dedicated to Marie de Bourgueil, making his complaints against the beloveds interchangeable. Ronsard also cleverly profited twice from the set of poems commissioned by French king Henri III for his recently deceased lover Marie de Clèves, when he repurposed and published them in a new collection, Sur la Mort de Marie, dedicated to his beloved Marie de Bourgueil. Part 3 analyzes Shakespeare’s sonnets within the framework of the Petrarchan homo economicus and a “dynamics of maturation” that characterized the poetry of Sidney and Spenser. Kennedy theorizes that, based on the opaque quality of the Young Man poems, Shakespeare continued to revise them after he composed the Dark Lady poems, and right up to the quarto’s publication in 1609. Indeed, it is in the Young Man cycle, where the figures of the homo economicus and homo literarum come together, where we see more explicit references to economics, enterprise, and work alongside the poetic expression of love, desire, and male friendship/homosociality. Kennedy closes the book by returning to the “shape-shifting” figure of Mercury as a model for the poets—and their respective contextual economies—examined throughout the book. He ultimately shows how Petrarch’s legacy was as economic as it was poetic, that the act of poetic revision and emendation should be understood within both theoretical frames of Platonic furor and Aristotelian craftsmanship. Kennedy’s command of the source materials and close readings of poetic variants are exceptional. With Petrarchism at Work he has written another authoritative and original study of Petrarch’s legacy that will greatly impact the field.","PeriodicalId":84799,"journal":{"name":"Genre (Los Angeles, Calif.)","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genre (Los Angeles, Calif.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/00166928-8847214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Les Amours would lead to more profitable long-term patronage. This approach to craftsmanship is reflected both thematically in his poetry and economically in his publishing practices. Kennedy reveals how Ronsard recycled poems between one collection of poetry dedicated to Cassandra Salviati and a later one dedicated to Marie de Bourgueil, making his complaints against the beloveds interchangeable. Ronsard also cleverly profited twice from the set of poems commissioned by French king Henri III for his recently deceased lover Marie de Clèves, when he repurposed and published them in a new collection, Sur la Mort de Marie, dedicated to his beloved Marie de Bourgueil. Part 3 analyzes Shakespeare’s sonnets within the framework of the Petrarchan homo economicus and a “dynamics of maturation” that characterized the poetry of Sidney and Spenser. Kennedy theorizes that, based on the opaque quality of the Young Man poems, Shakespeare continued to revise them after he composed the Dark Lady poems, and right up to the quarto’s publication in 1609. Indeed, it is in the Young Man cycle, where the figures of the homo economicus and homo literarum come together, where we see more explicit references to economics, enterprise, and work alongside the poetic expression of love, desire, and male friendship/homosociality. Kennedy closes the book by returning to the “shape-shifting” figure of Mercury as a model for the poets—and their respective contextual economies—examined throughout the book. He ultimately shows how Petrarch’s legacy was as economic as it was poetic, that the act of poetic revision and emendation should be understood within both theoretical frames of Platonic furor and Aristotelian craftsmanship. Kennedy’s command of the source materials and close readings of poetic variants are exceptional. With Petrarchism at Work he has written another authoritative and original study of Petrarch’s legacy that will greatly impact the field.
Les Amours会带来更有利可图的长期赞助。这种工艺方法既反映在他的诗歌主题上,也反映在他的出版实践中。肯尼迪揭示了朗萨尔是如何在一本献给卡桑德拉·萨尔维亚蒂的诗集和一本献给玛丽·德·布尔盖尔的诗集之间循环使用诗歌的,这使得他对爱人的抱怨可以互换。朗萨尔还两次巧妙地从法国国王亨利三世为他最近去世的情人玛丽·德·克洛夫斯所委托的一套诗歌中获利,当时他重新利用并出版了一本新的诗集《Sur la Mort de Marie》,献给他心爱的玛丽·德·布尔盖尔。第三部分在彼特拉克的“经济人”和西德尼和斯宾塞诗歌的“成熟的动力”的框架下分析莎士比亚十四行诗。肯尼迪的理论是,基于《年轻人》诗歌晦涩难懂的特点,莎士比亚在创作《黑暗女士》诗歌后继续修改它们,直到1609年四开本出版。事实上,正是在《青年》的循环中,经济人和文学人的形象结合在一起,我们看到了更多对经济、企业和工作的明确引用,以及对爱情、欲望和男性友谊/同性恋社会的诗意表达。肯尼迪以“变形”的墨丘利作为诗人和他们各自的背景经济的典范来结束这本书。他最终展示了彼特拉克的遗产是如何既具有经济意义,又具有诗歌意义,诗歌的修改和修订行为应该在柏拉图式的狂热和亚里士多德式的工艺的理论框架中被理解。肯尼迪对原始材料的掌握和对诗歌变体的仔细阅读是非常出色的。在《彼特拉克主义的工作》一书中,他对彼特拉克的遗产进行了又一次权威和原创的研究,这将极大地影响该领域。