Elder abuse.

Margaret Gililland
{"title":"Elder abuse.","authors":"Margaret Gililland","doi":"10.1093/obo/9780195396607-0309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Criminological concerns with the victimization of the elderly has developed parallel to, and independently of, the elder abuse debate. Criminologists have traditionally been concerned with the commission of acts against the older person in public as opposed to private space. A further hindrance to criminological enquiry is the practice of defining elder abuse in terms of victim needs, rather than of basic human rights. There has been no neat evolutionary process from positive treatment of the elderly, attributed to some golden age in the past to their increasing present victimization rates globally. Elder victimization is a long way from the simplistic notions of “granny battering.” There is general agreement among scholars that older people regularly suffer victimization in private space—in the household and in care institutions. They regularly experience multiple forms of abuse. One can attribute some of these experiences to major social changes as declining family support for older people diminishes and the proportion of young to old decreases. The World Health Organization (WHO) states that as the global population ages, the number of people aged sixty years and older is estimated to reach 1.2 billion worldwide by 2025. More pointedly, the longevity is also inextricably linked to the maltreatment of the global old. In particular, we have seen offenders apprehended in transgressions against the young, women, and ethnic minorities but have yet to see an active criminal justice response concerned with the experience of elder victimization. The discipline’s reluctance to recognize elder victimization is associated with it commonly being labeled as victimization by intimates, and to be understood through the lenses of psychology and psychiatry rather than through a criminal justice model. Care and individual needs of the elderly have been the traditional focus, rather than social justice, reason, and rights. Justice and rights involve choice and free will. Older people are not simply passive recipients of other people’s actions—they resist their victimization and often fight back. This article is a critical exposition of the sources available on elders abused as part of a larger account of the experience of older people worldwide. In particular, the reader is reminded that this article is limited due to publishing word constraints. Therefore, it provides a balanced, limited overview of the major literature and research available in the Western context. More pointedly, the literature cited here is intended to reflect on recent scholarship considered to have the potential of adding to the debate in criminology and elder victimization. Given that the study of elder abuse is still in its infancy in the discipline of criminology, this article is therefore necessarily interdisciplinary.","PeriodicalId":22999,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of practical nursing","volume":"38 1","pages":"5-9; quiz 10-1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"511","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of practical nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780195396607-0309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 511

Abstract

Criminological concerns with the victimization of the elderly has developed parallel to, and independently of, the elder abuse debate. Criminologists have traditionally been concerned with the commission of acts against the older person in public as opposed to private space. A further hindrance to criminological enquiry is the practice of defining elder abuse in terms of victim needs, rather than of basic human rights. There has been no neat evolutionary process from positive treatment of the elderly, attributed to some golden age in the past to their increasing present victimization rates globally. Elder victimization is a long way from the simplistic notions of “granny battering.” There is general agreement among scholars that older people regularly suffer victimization in private space—in the household and in care institutions. They regularly experience multiple forms of abuse. One can attribute some of these experiences to major social changes as declining family support for older people diminishes and the proportion of young to old decreases. The World Health Organization (WHO) states that as the global population ages, the number of people aged sixty years and older is estimated to reach 1.2 billion worldwide by 2025. More pointedly, the longevity is also inextricably linked to the maltreatment of the global old. In particular, we have seen offenders apprehended in transgressions against the young, women, and ethnic minorities but have yet to see an active criminal justice response concerned with the experience of elder victimization. The discipline’s reluctance to recognize elder victimization is associated with it commonly being labeled as victimization by intimates, and to be understood through the lenses of psychology and psychiatry rather than through a criminal justice model. Care and individual needs of the elderly have been the traditional focus, rather than social justice, reason, and rights. Justice and rights involve choice and free will. Older people are not simply passive recipients of other people’s actions—they resist their victimization and often fight back. This article is a critical exposition of the sources available on elders abused as part of a larger account of the experience of older people worldwide. In particular, the reader is reminded that this article is limited due to publishing word constraints. Therefore, it provides a balanced, limited overview of the major literature and research available in the Western context. More pointedly, the literature cited here is intended to reflect on recent scholarship considered to have the potential of adding to the debate in criminology and elder victimization. Given that the study of elder abuse is still in its infancy in the discipline of criminology, this article is therefore necessarily interdisciplinary.
虐待老人。
对老年人受害的犯罪学关注与虐待老年人的辩论平行发展,并独立发展。传统上,犯罪学家关注的是在公共场所对老年人实施的行为,而不是在私人空间。刑事调查的另一个障碍是根据受害者的需要而不是根据基本人权来界定虐待老人的做法。从对老年人的积极对待(归因于过去的某些黄金时代)到目前全球范围内老年人受害率的上升,并没有一个整齐的进化过程。老年人受害与“虐待奶奶”的简单概念相去甚远。学者们普遍认为,老年人经常在私人空间——家庭和护理机构——遭受伤害。他们经常遭受多种形式的虐待。人们可以将其中一些经历归因于重大的社会变化,如家庭对老年人的支持减少,年轻人对老年人的比例下降。世界卫生组织(世卫组织)指出,随着全球人口老龄化,到2025年,全球60岁及以上人口的数量估计将达到12亿。更明显的是,长寿也与全球老年人的虐待密不可分。特别是,我们已经看到罪犯因侵犯年轻人、妇女和少数民族而被捕,但尚未看到与老年人受害经历有关的积极的刑事司法反应。该学科不愿承认老年人受害与它通常被贴上亲密关系受害者的标签有关,并且通过心理学和精神病学的镜头而不是通过刑事司法模型来理解。老年人的关怀和个人需求一直是传统的焦点,而不是社会正义、理性和权利。正义和权利包括选择和自由意志。老年人不只是被动地接受别人的行为——他们抵制别人的伤害,并经常反击。这篇文章是一个关键的阐述,可获得的来源虐待老人作为一个更大的帐户的一部分,老年人的经验,全世界。特别提醒读者,由于出版字数的限制,本文内容有限。因此,它对西方背景下的主要文献和研究提供了一个平衡的、有限的概述。更有针对性的是,这里引用的文献旨在反映最近的学术研究,这些研究被认为有可能增加犯罪学和老年人受害的辩论。鉴于虐待老人的研究在犯罪学学科中仍处于起步阶段,因此这篇文章必然是跨学科的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信