Surgical site infection in Nigerian patients: A comparative study of two prophylactic antibiotics

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
G. Enweluzo, O. Akinmokun, E. Alabi, A. Ohadugha, S. Giwa
{"title":"Surgical site infection in Nigerian patients: A comparative study of two prophylactic antibiotics","authors":"G. Enweluzo, O. Akinmokun, E. Alabi, A. Ohadugha, S. Giwa","doi":"10.4103/jcls.jcls_24_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Infection remains an important complication of surgical procedures. It is an important aspect of patient care as it can be a source of distress for the patients, and the healthcare system in terms of finance and psychological impact. The administration of appropriate prophylactic antibiotics is important in the prevention of surgical site infection (SSI). However, resistance to antibiotics by the micro-organisms is a growing concern in the healthcare industry. This study compared the infection rate between Ceftriaxone and Ceftriaxone-Tazobactam combination as surgical prophylaxis in Nigerian population. Method: This was a double blinded randomized study conducted at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital from October 2020 to September2021. Two hundred and forty (240) patients ,who were to have surgical procedures performed on them, were recruited and randomly distributed into two groups (A&B) of 120 patients each. Group A were those who had Ceftriaxone alone ,while group B were those who had combination of Ceftriaxone and Tazobactam. Results: There was no statistical difference in the demographic characteristics of the two groups .The crude infection rate was 3 .8 %. The infection rate in group A was 3 .3 % within the first week but increased to 4 .2 % in the second week. The infection rate in group B was 3 .3 % within the first week and second week. At 30 days, the infection rate within group A was 2 .5 % and 0 % in group B. Regression analysis showed advanced age (P =0 .003), level of education (P =0 .0001),prolonged duration of surgery (P =0 .012) and excessive blood loss (P =0 .0001) as the important factors associated with development of SSI in the patients included in the study. Conclusion: Surgical site infection remains an important complication following surgeries. Certain factors such as advanced age, prolonged surgery and excessive blood loss increase the risk for SSI. Efforts should be geared towards prevention of SSI in patients by modifying risk factors that are modifiable and using antibiotics with better infection rate as prophylaxis.","PeriodicalId":15490,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcls.jcls_24_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Infection remains an important complication of surgical procedures. It is an important aspect of patient care as it can be a source of distress for the patients, and the healthcare system in terms of finance and psychological impact. The administration of appropriate prophylactic antibiotics is important in the prevention of surgical site infection (SSI). However, resistance to antibiotics by the micro-organisms is a growing concern in the healthcare industry. This study compared the infection rate between Ceftriaxone and Ceftriaxone-Tazobactam combination as surgical prophylaxis in Nigerian population. Method: This was a double blinded randomized study conducted at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital from October 2020 to September2021. Two hundred and forty (240) patients ,who were to have surgical procedures performed on them, were recruited and randomly distributed into two groups (A&B) of 120 patients each. Group A were those who had Ceftriaxone alone ,while group B were those who had combination of Ceftriaxone and Tazobactam. Results: There was no statistical difference in the demographic characteristics of the two groups .The crude infection rate was 3 .8 %. The infection rate in group A was 3 .3 % within the first week but increased to 4 .2 % in the second week. The infection rate in group B was 3 .3 % within the first week and second week. At 30 days, the infection rate within group A was 2 .5 % and 0 % in group B. Regression analysis showed advanced age (P =0 .003), level of education (P =0 .0001),prolonged duration of surgery (P =0 .012) and excessive blood loss (P =0 .0001) as the important factors associated with development of SSI in the patients included in the study. Conclusion: Surgical site infection remains an important complication following surgeries. Certain factors such as advanced age, prolonged surgery and excessive blood loss increase the risk for SSI. Efforts should be geared towards prevention of SSI in patients by modifying risk factors that are modifiable and using antibiotics with better infection rate as prophylaxis.
尼日利亚患者手术部位感染:两种预防性抗生素的比较研究
背景:感染仍然是外科手术的一个重要并发症。这是患者护理的一个重要方面,因为它可能是患者和医疗保健系统在财务和心理影响方面的痛苦来源。给予适当的预防性抗生素是预防手术部位感染(SSI)的重要。然而,微生物对抗生素的耐药性是医疗保健行业日益关注的问题。本研究比较了头孢曲松和头孢曲松-他唑巴坦联合手术预防在尼日利亚人群中的感染率。方法:这是一项双盲随机研究,于2020年10月至2021年9月在拉各斯大学教学医院进行。240名即将接受外科手术的患者被招募并随机分为两组(a组和b组),每组120名患者。A组为头孢曲松单用组,B组为头孢曲松与他唑巴坦合用组。结果:两组患者人口学特征差异无统计学意义,粗感染率为3.8%。A组第1周感染率为3.3%,第2周感染率上升至4.2%。B组第1周和第2周感染率为3.3%。30 d时,A组感染率为2.5%,b组感染率为0%。回归分析显示,高龄(P = 0.003)、文化程度(P = 0.0001)、手术时间延长(P = 0.012)和失血过多(P = 0.0001)是本组患者发生SSI的重要因素。结论:手术部位感染仍是术后重要并发症。高龄、手术时间延长和失血过多等因素会增加SSI的风险。应通过改变可改变的危险因素和使用感染率较高的抗生素作为预防措施,努力预防患者SSI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Sciences
Journal of Clinical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
45 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信