Multicorporalidad frente a ocularcentrismo: de la ciudad ojo-individuo a la ciudad sensorial-participada.

IF 0.2 4区 艺术学 0 ARCHITECTURE
ARQ Pub Date : 2020-01-10 DOI:10.5209/cuts.60741
Laura Moya Santander, José Angel Bergua Amores, Marcos Ruiz Pérez
{"title":"Multicorporalidad frente a ocularcentrismo: de la ciudad ojo-individuo a la ciudad sensorial-participada.","authors":"Laura Moya Santander, José Angel Bergua Amores, Marcos Ruiz Pérez","doi":"10.5209/cuts.60741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolAlgunos autores/as, como Jay (1988, 2003, 2007, 2008), Levin (1988, 1993) o Jenks (1995), han investigado acerca de la influencia del ocularcentrismo en la cultura occidental. Otros/as, como Pallasmaa (2006), han especificado esta influencia en el ambito arquitectonico y urbanistico. Finalmente, a partir de la decada de los ochenta, la antropologia sensorial cuestiono el visualismo del pensamiento y cultura occidentales, haciendo hincapie en trascender este sesgo con el fin de conectar con la experiencia cultural de los sujetos no occidentales. Sin embargo, y atendiendo a los avances en esta ultima disciplina, las taxonomias de los sentidos en las culturas responden a un orden cultural y social determinado por la asignacion de mayor o menor valor a nuestros sentidos. ?Y si cuestionamos dicha taxonomia ocularcentrica dentro de nuestra propia cultura occidental, valiendonos de las experiencias de los cuerpos que resisten a dicha jerarquizacion? En este articulo se analiza como se gesto el ocularcentrismo en la Modernidad y como continua siendo el principal paradigma en la construccion de las ciudades. Mas tarde, atendiendo al desmontaje de dichas taxonomias de la mano de la antropologia sensorial y utilizando la multiplicidad de tecnologias que en nuestro tiempo permiten la sinestesia e interdependencia de los sentidos, se presenta un proyecto multisensorial para habitar la ciudad. Este proyecto tiene por objetivo facilitar a los participantes habitar los espacios urbanos de maneras diversas, alejadas de las formas normalizadas de interaccion. EnglishCertain authors, such as Jay (1988, 2003, 2007, 2008), Levin (1988, 1993) and Jenks (1995), have investigated the influence of ocular-centrism in Western culture. Others such as Pallasmaa (2006) have specifically considered this influence in the architectural and planning context. Finally and since the 1980s, sensory anthropology has questioned the visualism of Western thought and culture, emphasising a need to transcend this bias in order to connect with the cultural experience of non-Western subjects. However, and taking into account the advances of the latter field, cultural taxonomies of the senses follow a cultural and social order that is determined by the assignment of greater or lesser value to our senses. But we may use the experience of bodies that resist this hierarchical process to question the ocular-centric taxonomy present in our own Western culture. This article analyses how ocular-centrism was managed in modernity and how it remains the main paradigm in the construction of the cities. The paper then presents a multisensorial project for inhabiting cities based on the dismantling of said taxonomies through sensory anthropology, making use of the range of contemporary technologies that permit synaesthesia and the interdependence of our senses. The aim of this project is to enable participants to inhabit urban spaces in diverse ways that differ from the normalised forms of interaction.","PeriodicalId":43591,"journal":{"name":"ARQ","volume":"24 1","pages":"127-140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARQ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5209/cuts.60741","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

espanolAlgunos autores/as, como Jay (1988, 2003, 2007, 2008), Levin (1988, 1993) o Jenks (1995), han investigado acerca de la influencia del ocularcentrismo en la cultura occidental. Otros/as, como Pallasmaa (2006), han especificado esta influencia en el ambito arquitectonico y urbanistico. Finalmente, a partir de la decada de los ochenta, la antropologia sensorial cuestiono el visualismo del pensamiento y cultura occidentales, haciendo hincapie en trascender este sesgo con el fin de conectar con la experiencia cultural de los sujetos no occidentales. Sin embargo, y atendiendo a los avances en esta ultima disciplina, las taxonomias de los sentidos en las culturas responden a un orden cultural y social determinado por la asignacion de mayor o menor valor a nuestros sentidos. ?Y si cuestionamos dicha taxonomia ocularcentrica dentro de nuestra propia cultura occidental, valiendonos de las experiencias de los cuerpos que resisten a dicha jerarquizacion? En este articulo se analiza como se gesto el ocularcentrismo en la Modernidad y como continua siendo el principal paradigma en la construccion de las ciudades. Mas tarde, atendiendo al desmontaje de dichas taxonomias de la mano de la antropologia sensorial y utilizando la multiplicidad de tecnologias que en nuestro tiempo permiten la sinestesia e interdependencia de los sentidos, se presenta un proyecto multisensorial para habitar la ciudad. Este proyecto tiene por objetivo facilitar a los participantes habitar los espacios urbanos de maneras diversas, alejadas de las formas normalizadas de interaccion. EnglishCertain authors, such as Jay (1988, 2003, 2007, 2008), Levin (1988, 1993) and Jenks (1995), have investigated the influence of ocular-centrism in Western culture. Others such as Pallasmaa (2006) have specifically considered this influence in the architectural and planning context. Finally and since the 1980s, sensory anthropology has questioned the visualism of Western thought and culture, emphasising a need to transcend this bias in order to connect with the cultural experience of non-Western subjects. However, and taking into account the advances of the latter field, cultural taxonomies of the senses follow a cultural and social order that is determined by the assignment of greater or lesser value to our senses. But we may use the experience of bodies that resist this hierarchical process to question the ocular-centric taxonomy present in our own Western culture. This article analyses how ocular-centrism was managed in modernity and how it remains the main paradigm in the construction of the cities. The paper then presents a multisensorial project for inhabiting cities based on the dismantling of said taxonomies through sensory anthropology, making use of the range of contemporary technologies that permit synaesthesia and the interdependence of our senses. The aim of this project is to enable participants to inhabit urban spaces in diverse ways that differ from the normalised forms of interaction.
多体与眼中心主义:从眼个体城市到感官参与城市。
一些作者,如Jay (1988, 2003, 2007, 2008), Levin(1988, 1993)和Jenks(1995),研究了眼中心主义对西方文化的影响。其他的,如Pallasmaa(2006),在建筑和城市领域指定了这种影响。最后,从20世纪80年代开始,感官人类学质疑西方思想和文化的视觉主义,强调超越这种偏见,以连接非西方主体的文化体验。然而,考虑到这最后一门学科的发展,文化中的感官分类响应了一种文化和社会秩序,这种秩序是由赋予我们的感官或多或少的价值决定的。如果我们在我们自己的西方文化中质疑这种以眼为中心的分类,验证抵制这种等级制度的身体体验,会怎么样?本文分析了眼中心主义在现代性中的表现,以及它如何继续成为城市建设的主要范式。后来,通过感官人类学对这些分类的分解,并利用我们这个时代允许感官联觉和相互依赖的多种技术,提出了一个居住在城市的多感官项目。该项目旨在促进参与者以不同的方式生活在城市空间,远离标准化的互动形式。一些作家,如Jay (1988, 2003, 2007, 2008), Levin(1988, 1993)和Jenks(1995),研究了眼中心主义对西方文化的影响。= =地理= =根据美国人口普查,这个县的总面积为,其中土地和(2.641平方公里)水。在20世纪80年代和90年代,感官人类学对西方思想和文化的视觉主义提出了质疑,强调有必要超越这种偏见,将其与非西方主体的文化经验联系起来。然而,考虑到后一种领域的发展,感官的文化分类遵循一种文化和社会秩序,这种秩序是由赋予我们的感官更大或更小的价值所决定的。= =地理= =根据美国人口普查,这个县的面积为,其中土地面积为,其中土地面积为。这篇文章分析了眼中心主义在现代是如何被管理的,以及它如何仍然是城市建设的主要范式。然后,该论文提出了一项针对残疾城市的多感官项目,其基础是通过感官人类学消除上述分类,利用各种当代技术,使我们的感官具有联觉性和相互依赖性。这个项目的目的是让参与者以不同于标准化互动形式的各种方式居住城市空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ARQ
ARQ ARCHITECTURE-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: ARQ is a journal of the School of Architecture of the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile and is part of the periodical publications of the University. ARQ is a quarterly publication aimed at professionals and academics, and dedicated to the dissemination of a critical selection of the architecture of Chile and South America and its related disciplines of ARQ Each issue addresses a theme that gives way to the editing, prioritizing excellence and variety of items, both papers as works and projects. The relationship with the academic world allows a permanent contact with international journals of architecture, with whom we develop regular exchanges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信