Women Are at Higher Risk for Concussions Due to Ball or Equipment Contact in Soccer and Lacrosse.

D. Ling, Jennifer Cheng, Kristen A Santiago, Brittany Ammerman, B. Jivanelli, J. Hannafin, E. Casey
{"title":"Women Are at Higher Risk for Concussions Due to Ball or Equipment Contact in Soccer and Lacrosse.","authors":"D. Ling, Jennifer Cheng, Kristen A Santiago, Brittany Ammerman, B. Jivanelli, J. Hannafin, E. Casey","doi":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000000995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nThere is ample evidence to suggest sex- and gender-based differences in the incidence of sports-related concussions. The mechanisms of concussion may vary between male and female athletes and contribute to this observed difference. Understanding the underlying etiology by pooling data from primary studies across different settings and sport types will inform interventions that can reduce concussion rates.\n\n\nQUESTIONS/PURPOSES\nSpecifically, we asked: (1) In which sports are female athletes less likely to experience concussions from player contact? (2) In which sports are female athletes more likely to experience concussions because of ball or equipment contact?\n\n\nMETHODS\nPubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify articles published from January 2000 to December 2018. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria, which were studies that reported concussion incidence by mechanism for both male and female athletes. Exclusion criteria included non-English studies, conference abstracts, and studies on non-sports related concussions. The sports represented by the 10 studies included ice hockey (n = 4), soccer (n = 5), basketball (n = 4), baseball/softball (n = 4), and lacrosse (n = 5). The rate ratio was calculated as the incidence rate in female athletes/male athletes for each concussion mechanism or activity. Data were pooled using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. Study quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.\n\n\nRESULTS\nFemale athletes were at lower risk of player-contact-induced concussions in lacrosse (pooled rate ratio 0.33 [95% CI 0.25 to 0.43]; p < 0.001), basketball (pooled rate ratio 0.86 [95% CI 0.76 to 0.97]; p = 0.01), ice hockey (pooled rate ratio 0.64 [95% CI 0.56 to 0.73]; p < 0.001), soccer (pooled rate ratio 0.70 [95% CI 0.66 to 0.75]; p < 0.001), and soccer heading (pooled rate ratio 0.80 [95% CI 0.72 to 0.90]; p < 0.001); in these sports, men were at higher risk of concussions from player contact. Female athletes were more likely to experience concussions because of ball or equipment contact in lacrosse (pooled rate ratio 3.24 [95% CI 2.10 to 4.99]; p < 0.001), soccer (pooled rate ratio 2.04 [95% CI 1.67 to 2.49]; p < 0.001), and soccer heading (pooled rate ratio 2.63 [95% CI 1.84 to 3.77]; p < 0.001).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe mechanism or activity underlying concussions differs between male and female athletes across different sports. This finding remains the same regardless of whether there are rule differences between the men's and women's games. The implementation of other interventions are required to further ensure player safety, including protective head equipment, concussion prevention training, or rules limiting player contact in the men's game.\n\n\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\nLevel III, retrospective study.","PeriodicalId":10465,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000000995","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

BACKGROUND There is ample evidence to suggest sex- and gender-based differences in the incidence of sports-related concussions. The mechanisms of concussion may vary between male and female athletes and contribute to this observed difference. Understanding the underlying etiology by pooling data from primary studies across different settings and sport types will inform interventions that can reduce concussion rates. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES Specifically, we asked: (1) In which sports are female athletes less likely to experience concussions from player contact? (2) In which sports are female athletes more likely to experience concussions because of ball or equipment contact? METHODS PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify articles published from January 2000 to December 2018. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria, which were studies that reported concussion incidence by mechanism for both male and female athletes. Exclusion criteria included non-English studies, conference abstracts, and studies on non-sports related concussions. The sports represented by the 10 studies included ice hockey (n = 4), soccer (n = 5), basketball (n = 4), baseball/softball (n = 4), and lacrosse (n = 5). The rate ratio was calculated as the incidence rate in female athletes/male athletes for each concussion mechanism or activity. Data were pooled using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. Study quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS Female athletes were at lower risk of player-contact-induced concussions in lacrosse (pooled rate ratio 0.33 [95% CI 0.25 to 0.43]; p < 0.001), basketball (pooled rate ratio 0.86 [95% CI 0.76 to 0.97]; p = 0.01), ice hockey (pooled rate ratio 0.64 [95% CI 0.56 to 0.73]; p < 0.001), soccer (pooled rate ratio 0.70 [95% CI 0.66 to 0.75]; p < 0.001), and soccer heading (pooled rate ratio 0.80 [95% CI 0.72 to 0.90]; p < 0.001); in these sports, men were at higher risk of concussions from player contact. Female athletes were more likely to experience concussions because of ball or equipment contact in lacrosse (pooled rate ratio 3.24 [95% CI 2.10 to 4.99]; p < 0.001), soccer (pooled rate ratio 2.04 [95% CI 1.67 to 2.49]; p < 0.001), and soccer heading (pooled rate ratio 2.63 [95% CI 1.84 to 3.77]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The mechanism or activity underlying concussions differs between male and female athletes across different sports. This finding remains the same regardless of whether there are rule differences between the men's and women's games. The implementation of other interventions are required to further ensure player safety, including protective head equipment, concussion prevention training, or rules limiting player contact in the men's game. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, retrospective study.
女性在足球和长曲棍球比赛中因球或设备接触而患脑震荡的风险更高。
背景:有充分的证据表明,运动相关脑震荡的发生率存在性别差异和性别差异。男性和女性运动员的脑震荡机制可能有所不同,这也导致了观察到的差异。通过汇集来自不同环境和运动类型的初步研究数据,了解潜在的病因,将为降低脑震荡发生率的干预措施提供信息。具体来说,我们的问题是:(1)在哪些运动中,女运动员更不容易因与运动员接触而发生脑震荡?(2)在哪些运动项目中,女运动员更容易因球或器材接触而发生脑震荡?方法检索spubmed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆数据库,确定2000年1月至2018年12月发表的文章。10项研究符合纳入标准,这些研究报告了男性和女性运动员的脑震荡发生率。排除标准包括非英语研究、会议摘要和与运动无关的脑震荡研究。10项研究所代表的运动项目包括冰球(n = 4)、足球(n = 5)、篮球(n = 4)、棒球/垒球(n = 4)和长曲棍球(n = 5)。以每种脑震荡机制或活动在女运动员/男运动员中的发病率计算发病率比。使用dersimonan - laird随机效应模型汇总数据。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估研究质量。结果女运动员在长曲棍球比赛中发生球员接触性脑震荡的风险较低(合并率比0.33 [95% CI 0.25 ~ 0.43];p < 0.001),篮球(合并率比0.86 [95% CI 0.76 ~ 0.97];p = 0.01),冰球(合并率比0.64 [95% CI 0.56 ~ 0.73];p < 0.001),足球(合并比率0.70 [95% CI 0.66 ~ 0.75];p < 0.001)和足球头球(合并率比0.80 [95% CI 0.72 ~ 0.90];P < 0.001);在这些运动中,男性因与运动员接触而患脑震荡的风险更高。女运动员在长曲棍球比赛中更容易因球或设备接触而发生脑震荡(合并率比3.24 [95% CI 2.10至4.99];p < 0.001),足球(合并比率2.04 [95% CI 1.67至2.49];p < 0.001)和足球头球(合并率比2.63 [95% CI 1.84 ~ 3.77];P < 0.001)。结论男性和女性运动员在不同运动项目中发生脑震荡的机制或活动存在差异。无论男女比赛的规则是否不同,这一发现都是一样的。其他干预措施的实施需要进一步确保球员的安全,包括保护头部设备,脑震荡预防训练,或在男子比赛中限制球员接触的规则。证据等级:III级,回顾性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信